Local Elections 2022

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
User avatar
snoozeofreason
Snowbonk
Posts: 485
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm

Local Elections 2022

Post by snoozeofreason » Tue May 03, 2022 2:30 pm

We don't seem to have a thread on this, so I thought I'd start one.

I am going to begin with a harumph. This is the time at which the loyal foot soldiers of the Labour Party, such as myself, get called upon to distribute leaflets. There aren't any seats up for election in my area, so my services will not be called on, and I am rather glad, because the leaflet to be distributed starts like this.
leaflet.jpg
leaflet.jpg (67.32 KiB) Viewed 1791 times
The £2,620 claim is just annoying. It has been repeatedly pointed out that it is based on flawed assumptions. The party must be aware of this, but has decided neither to correct, nor to properly justify the claim. So it's hard to argue that they are making an honest mistake, and it is getting easier to argue that they are lying - in much the same way as the £350 million weekly payment claim made by Brexiteers was a lie.

What's doubly annoying is that it isn't necessary to produce such misleading stuff. If the leaflet said something along the lines of "The average family will be more than £1,000 pounds worse off under the Conservatives," it would probably be just as impactful, without being dishonest. I'd be happy to distribute that. (And if the leaflet made it clear that a substantial contribution to that sum came from a rise in National Insurance - and explained why this is a terrible way to raise money - then I'd happily set it to music and sing it through peoples' letter boxes.)

I am planning to be fairly discrete in my harumphing. It's not the sort of thing I would want to mention to any fellow party members - with the exception of Mrs. S and any comrades on this forum - because I know how arguments about statistics in politics tend to play out. Peoples' attitudes to a misleading statistic depend on how that statistic fits into their world view. Attempts to point out that the £2,620 is an exaggeration would probably just be met with accusations that this was an exercise in splitting of hairs and suppression of debate about an important topic (probably from people who, not long ago, were spitting tacks about the £350 million claim). This is an attitude that drives me up the wall. The leaflet doesn't after all suggest that the hit to local families will be about £2,600. It gives an exact figure without any qualification.

My view is that, if someone throws a number into the debate without any qualification on its accuracy, then they own it. If that number is expressed in large conspicuous font on a leaflet, or internet post, or the side of a bus, then they definitely own it. It's fine to qualify claims like this - for example to point out that some figures cannot be calculated exactly - but only if this is done upfront when the figure is introduced. Falling back on such qualifications only when the figure is queried is the mark of a hypocrite.

Anyway, that's my harumph over. I shall now, as Mrs Snooze likes to say, pack away my soap box. I am sure that the local elections will produce many other things to get annoyed about.
In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. The human body was knocked up pretty late on the Friday afternoon, with a deadline looming. How well do you expect it to work?

monkey
After Pie
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by monkey » Tue May 03, 2022 3:45 pm

If I was the sort of person that didn't bother reading the leaflets, I'd probably just throw that in the bin, but then complain that "at least the Conservatives sent a leaflet, didn't get anything from Labour, it's like they don't care"

Why doesn't it say "Vote Labour" in big letters? Why is it Tory blue?


(Also, prize to the first misleading graph from the Lib Dems)

User avatar
snoozeofreason
Snowbonk
Posts: 485
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by snoozeofreason » Tue May 03, 2022 10:24 pm

monkey wrote:
Tue May 03, 2022 3:45 pm
If I was the sort of person that didn't bother reading the leaflets, I'd probably just throw that in the bin, but then complain that "at least the Conservatives sent a leaflet, didn't get anything from Labour, it's like they don't care"

Why doesn't it say "Vote Labour" in big letters? Why is it Tory blue?


(Also, prize to the first misleading graph from the Lib Dems)
To be fair, that was just one side of the leaflet. The other side looks like this
leaflet_verso.jpg
leaflet_verso.jpg (100.11 KiB) Viewed 1692 times
That side is predominantly red and does say "Vote Labour" in medium sized letters. So maybe the impression left by the leaflet will depend on which side up it lands on the voter's doormat.
In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. The human body was knocked up pretty late on the Friday afternoon, with a deadline looming. How well do you expect it to work?

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Little waster » Tue May 03, 2022 10:46 pm

TBF at a quick glance it looks it's suggesting Starmer is "bumbling from crisis to crisis". 😐
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed May 04, 2022 9:26 am

Yeah that leaflet f.cking sucks - negative campaigning, ineptly executed.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
JQH
After Pie
Posts: 2141
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Sar Flandan

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by JQH » Wed May 04, 2022 9:33 am

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:26 am
Yeah that leaflet f.cking sucks - negative campaigning, ineptly executed.
Seems to be a lot of it about. Friend in Bury received something about the high cost of Tory rule - in an envelope labelled "Final Demand". Local party couldn't grasp why she was angry.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.

Fintan O'Toole

User avatar
TopBadger
Catbabel
Posts: 782
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:33 pm
Location: Halfway up

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by TopBadger » Wed May 04, 2022 9:34 am

Does anyone read them? Even if they do, does a leaflet change voting intentions?

I think leaflets just piss people off.
You can't polish a turd...
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html

User avatar
JQH
After Pie
Posts: 2141
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Sar Flandan

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by JQH » Wed May 04, 2022 9:36 am

OTOH if parties didn't leaflet folks would complain their vote was being taken for granted.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.

Fintan O'Toole

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed May 04, 2022 9:46 am

TopBadger wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:34 am
Does anyone read them? Even if they do, does a leaflet change voting intentions?

I think leaflets just piss people off.
I generally do look at them in the locals to see what various parties are suggesting locally, yeah. Wouldn't be too impressed with a leaflet about Westminster stuff when the election's about bins and potholes. Johnson and Starmer are irrelevant, and local elections aren't gonna do much for your cost of living.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
science_fox
Snowbonk
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:34 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by science_fox » Wed May 04, 2022 10:01 am

TopBadger wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:34 am
Does anyone read them? Even if they do, does a leaflet change voting intentions?

I think leaflets just piss people off.
OtherHalf won't vote for a party that hasn't at least tried contact in some way. Very much feels being taken for granted in this Labour stronghold. So far we've had nothing from any party.
I'm not afraid of catching Covid, I'm afraid of catching idiot.

User avatar
discovolante
Stummy Beige
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by discovolante » Wed May 04, 2022 10:23 am

JQH wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:33 am
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:26 am
Yeah that leaflet f.cking sucks - negative campaigning, ineptly executed.
Seems to be a lot of it about. Friend in Bury received something about the high cost of Tory rule - in an envelope labelled "Final Demand". Local party couldn't grasp why she was angry.
Holy f.ck. Shaun Bailey pulled that trick for the London mayor elections and rightly got ripped to shreds. Maybe it's a bit London centric to assume they'd know about it but still...
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.

User avatar
snoozeofreason
Snowbonk
Posts: 485
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by snoozeofreason » Wed May 04, 2022 3:05 pm

If you are living in the South East you can, I am told by the party, look forward to vans with this on the side.
van.jpg
van.jpg (105.07 KiB) Viewed 1529 times
On close inspection it's a banner complaining about Tory lies, next to something that could count as a lie. On more sketchy inspection, it's all in Tory blue and looks like an invitation to vote Conservative!
In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. The human body was knocked up pretty late on the Friday afternoon, with a deadline looming. How well do you expect it to work?

User avatar
Stranger Mouse
After Pie
Posts: 2346
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 1:23 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Stranger Mouse » Wed May 04, 2022 4:29 pm

Interesting thread from Lewis Goodall about some of the local election leaflets

https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/statu ... SbpHzdInPw
I’ve decided I should be on the pardon list if that’s still in the works

User avatar
jdc
Hilda Ogden
Posts: 1925
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:31 pm
Location: Your Mum

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by jdc » Wed May 04, 2022 5:03 pm

Stranger Mouse wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 4:29 pm
Interesting thread from Lewis Goodall about some of the local election leaflets

https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/statu ... SbpHzdInPw
Best leaflet I've seen so far https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/15217960 ... name=small

User avatar
Little waster
After Pie
Posts: 2385
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Little waster » Wed May 04, 2022 6:45 pm

Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:46 am
local elections aren't gonna do much for your cost of living.
Although if we all went down to the polling stations tomorrow and voted on the basis that the "Local ConservativeTM" ran Council were really good at emptying the bins* then this could only be interpreted in No. 10 as vindication to continue to ignore Partygate, the cost of living, Ukrainian refugees, the melting ice-caps etc. and get back to the real business of seeing how much copper wiring is left to pull out of the walls in Downing Street and carry off to the local scrapyard.




*on the probably erroneous assumption that Conservative councillors are any less of a bunch of halfwitted, evil, corrupt shitehawks than their Westminster counterparts
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5276
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by jimbob » Wed May 04, 2022 9:22 pm

Little waster wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 6:45 pm
Bird on a Fire wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 9:46 am
local elections aren't gonna do much for your cost of living.
Although if we all went down to the polling stations tomorrow and voted on the basis that the "Local ConservativeTM" ran Council were really good at emptying the bins* then this could only be interpreted in No. 10 as vindication to continue to ignore Partygate, the cost of living, Ukrainian refugees, the melting ice-caps etc. and get back to the real business of seeing how much copper wiring is left to pull out of the walls in Downing Street and carry off to the local scrapyard.




*on the probably erroneous assumption that Conservative councillors are any less of a bunch of halfwitted, evil, corrupt shitehawks than their Westminster counterparts
We know that the Westminster Councillors (Dame Shirley Porter) were even worse. Putting people in buildings with asbestos dust.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by lpm » Thu May 05, 2022 12:01 am

I'm not going to vote. There's no point.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Thu May 05, 2022 2:18 am

Because there isn't an election where you are?
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
Rich Scopie
Snowbonk
Posts: 536
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Rich Scopie » Thu May 05, 2022 7:33 am

El Pollo Diablo wrote:
Thu May 05, 2022 2:18 am
Because there isn't an election where you are?
That's my excuse.
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by lpm » Thu May 05, 2022 7:40 am

Yes. But it doesn't stop twitter morons from nagging me to vote. Apparently its important and earnest words inside a leftie echo chamber will make a difference.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Thu May 05, 2022 7:47 am

I thought we all worked out it doesn't back in 2015?
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by lpm » Thu May 05, 2022 8:13 am

Apparently it's incredibly important for me to know Local Conservatives are just Conservatives. Thanks guys, that's stopped me making an embarrassing mistake.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Bird on a Fire » Thu May 05, 2022 8:45 am

El Pollo Diablo wrote:
Thu May 05, 2022 2:18 am
Because there isn't an election where you are?
I was wondering yesterday why my postal vote hadn't turned up. Checked. No election in my UK registered constituency either.

Might just send the polling office a postcard that says TORIES OUT or something.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
El Pollo Diablo
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: FBPE

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by El Pollo Diablo » Thu May 05, 2022 8:52 am

A few years ago, I got canvassed by a Tory member on the doorstep, explained I was voting Labour, and was accused of wanting the country to go bankrupt.

It turned out we didn't have an election that year.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued

User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5180
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Local Elections 2022

Post by Gfamily » Thu May 05, 2022 9:03 am

El Pollo Diablo wrote:
Thu May 05, 2022 8:52 am
A few years ago, I got canvassed by a Tory member on the doorstep,
An MP, a Councillor, or just a dick?
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

Post Reply