I know. f.cking insane, innit?Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:55 pmSunak calling Truss a socialist for wanting to cut taxes for the rich is a new level of weird (seemingly borrowed from the US playbook of anything I don't like = socialism = bad).
Who's next?
Re: Who's next?
Re: Who's next?
It's become quite widespread political habit these days to accuse people of something before they can accuse you of it with greater force. Hu Jintao calls people he doesn't like imperialists. Putin calls people he doesn't like Nazis. And beware of anyone standing on an anti-corruption ticket just about anywhere dodgy.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:55 pmSunak calling Truss a socialist for wanting to cut taxes for the rich is a new level of weird (seemingly borrowed from the US playbook of anything I don't like = socialism = bad).
I suppose Sunak felt he had to get the accusation in first before people started to accuse him of being the socialist for having the least tax-cutty policy of the various leadership candidates. Levelling up remains the manifesto policy of the conservative party, forgive me while I take this cup of tea in my hand a greater distance from the computer lest I splutter all over it.
Re: Who's next?
Public sector bodies can't sue for libel.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.
Fintan O'Toole
Fintan O'Toole
-
- Catbabel
- Posts: 654
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:59 pm
- Location: Shropshire - Welsh Borders
Re: Who's next?
No, but presumably MPs can be for stuff recorded outside of parliamen.
WOULD CUSTOMERS PLEASE REFRAIN FROM SITTING ON THE COUNTER BY THE BACON SLICER - AS WE'RE GETTING A LITTLE BEHIND IN OUR ORDERS.
- Tessa K
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 4714
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm
- Location: Closer than you'd like
Re: Who's next?
Politicians should be made to watch the politics rounds on Pointless to see how little people know or care about personality politics. Today was the Cabinet after the September '21 reshuffle - hardly ancient history.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
Now if the clues were “the sex scandal they resigned over” they might have scored better.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Who's next?
It is, and Liz Truss calling housing targets "Stalinist" is every bit as insanetom p wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 3:13 pmI know. f.cking insane, innit?Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:55 pmSunak calling Truss a socialist for wanting to cut taxes for the rich is a new level of weird (seemingly borrowed from the US playbook of anything I don't like = socialism = bad).
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Who's next?
Socialism is when the government does stuff. And it's more socialism the more stuff it does.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:26 pmIt is, and Liz Truss calling housing targets "Stalinist" is every bit as insanetom p wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 3:13 pmI know. f.cking insane, innit?Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:55 pmSunak calling Truss a socialist for wanting to cut taxes for the rich is a new level of weird (seemingly borrowed from the US playbook of anything I don't like = socialism = bad).
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Who's next?
Trevelyan (Team Tugendhat) seemed keen on Badenoch on sky news... and about Tugendhat supporters moving as a block...
Tomorrow could be very interesting, could Tugendhat support swing behind Badenoch, knocking out Truss? Then Truss' support you'd expect would go to Badenoch, knocking out Mourdaunt...
Tomorrow could be very interesting, could Tugendhat support swing behind Badenoch, knocking out Truss? Then Truss' support you'd expect would go to Badenoch, knocking out Mourdaunt...
You can't polish a turd...
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10137
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Who's next?
Are any of them significantly more or less sh.t than any of the others? Any have a redeeming (or uniquely damning) feature?
Really struggling to differentiate this bunch.
Really struggling to differentiate this bunch.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
Apparently they pulled the third debate because it was beginning to resemble the Hunger Games.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:10 pmAre any of them significantly more or less sh.t than any of the others? Any have a redeeming (or uniquely damning) feature?
Really struggling to differentiate this bunch.
I think they’ve missed a trick there.
In fact I’d throw the whole contest open to the entire Conservative parliamentary party and Squid Game ourselves to the next PM.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: Who's next?
Tongue firmly in cheek...: didn't the Tories take schools out of local authority rule...?
(I know, just being silly)
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: Who's next?
https://youtu.be/gnXUFXc2YnsBird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 7:30 pmSocialism is when the government does stuff. And it's more socialism the more stuff it does.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:26 pmIt is, and Liz Truss calling housing targets "Stalinist" is every bit as insane
I'm so sorry.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
Re: Who's next?
Watched it twice. Might go back for more.discovolante wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:33 pmhttps://youtu.be/gnXUFXc2YnsBird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 7:30 pmSocialism is when the government does stuff. And it's more socialism the more stuff it does.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:26 pm
It is, and Liz Truss calling housing targets "Stalinist" is every bit as insane
I'm so sorry.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
At which point it becomes Communism.jdc wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 12:24 amWatched it twice. Might go back for more.discovolante wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:33 pmhttps://youtu.be/gnXUFXc2YnsBird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 7:30 pm
Socialism is when the government does stuff. And it's more socialism the more stuff it does.
I'm so sorry.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: Who's next?
I see the least mouth-foaming candidate has been dropped. In the context of that field he was my least-bad.
I'm worred about Badenough - she's got the right combination of easy hatred, disregard for facts and sloganising to appeal to the party base, and the energy to do serious damage before the GE date. (And possibly find a way round that particular issue - a thing I genuinely worry about with this lot)
I'm worred about Badenough - she's got the right combination of easy hatred, disregard for facts and sloganising to appeal to the party base, and the energy to do serious damage before the GE date. (And possibly find a way round that particular issue - a thing I genuinely worry about with this lot)
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8279
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Who's next?
Is there some rule via which candidates who drop out leave some of the letters of their surname to the remaining candidates or something?
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Who's next?
I think that Badenoch seems to be the very worst. An absolute extremist thunderc.nt of Fox News proportions.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:10 pmAre any of them significantly more or less sh.t than any of the others? Any have a redeeming (or uniquely damning) feature?
Really struggling to differentiate this bunch.
Re: Who's next?
I was just thinking Sunak seems to be George Osborne Mk II. And lo and behold I immediately discover that he appointed George Osborne to advise him on policy a couple of days ago.
To me, Sunak seems to be the least swivel-eyed of the remaining candidates. For example, the (non-sectarian) Alliance Party in NI are saying he looks like the least hawkish of (all 8 of) the candidates on the destroy-the-NI-protocol policy.
Unfortunately, he has the skill of coming over as reasonable, but that doesn't mean he is. It's quite clear he is interested in coddling the rich, while politely denying very much for the poor. He describes himself as an economic Thatcherite, which means he wants to balance the budget in a Thatcher grocer's-daughter kind of way. And thus she screwed the poor. At the same time, he is the most reasonable of the remaining candidates on tax - he talks of tax cuts as "jam tomorrow", whereas for the rest it's "jam today".
So there are reasons to hope things might be a bit less chaotic and doctrinal, and a bit more competent under Sunak, in comparison to Johnson. But he represents the long term tradition of Toryism, ie privilege and the wealthy. And like all Tory PMs from Major onwards, he will have trouble with the increasingly numerous swivel-eyed back-benchers, unless he throws them enough meat. They are able to prevent reasonable pragmatism on many things.
The disadvantage is that returning to some sort of less chaotic, less swivel-eyed, rule is that the Tories might still have a hope at the next election.
To me, Sunak seems to be the least swivel-eyed of the remaining candidates. For example, the (non-sectarian) Alliance Party in NI are saying he looks like the least hawkish of (all 8 of) the candidates on the destroy-the-NI-protocol policy.
Unfortunately, he has the skill of coming over as reasonable, but that doesn't mean he is. It's quite clear he is interested in coddling the rich, while politely denying very much for the poor. He describes himself as an economic Thatcherite, which means he wants to balance the budget in a Thatcher grocer's-daughter kind of way. And thus she screwed the poor. At the same time, he is the most reasonable of the remaining candidates on tax - he talks of tax cuts as "jam tomorrow", whereas for the rest it's "jam today".
So there are reasons to hope things might be a bit less chaotic and doctrinal, and a bit more competent under Sunak, in comparison to Johnson. But he represents the long term tradition of Toryism, ie privilege and the wealthy. And like all Tory PMs from Major onwards, he will have trouble with the increasingly numerous swivel-eyed back-benchers, unless he throws them enough meat. They are able to prevent reasonable pragmatism on many things.
The disadvantage is that returning to some sort of less chaotic, less swivel-eyed, rule is that the Tories might still have a hope at the next election.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: Who's next?
This is the conundrum - loony, but hopefully easier to beat, Tory until next general election and have to put up with the lunacy, or a moderate Tory where life isn't quite as nuts, but they can do lots of quiet damage and be harder to get rid of.
- Brightonian
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1444
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
- Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland
Re: Who's next?
Little waster wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 8:04 pmMeanwhile with the country literally on fire, climate change got 5 thirty-second variations of:-
“its vitally important that when our grandchildren are caught between out of control wildfires and rising sea levels they can console themselves in their final agonising moments that at least the fossil fuel companies had a few more years of bumper profits before reality became undeniable and the climate crisis, irreversible”.
Re: Who's next?
Unfortunately Sunak is coming across as the adult in the room. It seemed inconceivable a few short weeks ago that he might have the faintest chance to replace Boris, but I (like most people, it seems) underestimated just how pisspoor the other candidates have been.
I have no idea who I think should win out of the contenders left. You know in Cards Against Humanity, if you don't like what's in your hand you can chuck the whole lot back into the deck and draw a fresh hand? Anyone else wishing they could do this right now?
Tugendhat was ISTM the Kasich of this particular ratfight, the only voice of relative sanity. How the others were allowed to get away with saying "Boris isn't dishonest, no, he's.. er.. misunderstood" without having to address the elephant in the room that the only reason he was allowed to lie his way through for so long until something tipped that balance is because they were supporting him all the way.
It was Liz Truss's to lose: if she had even managed to waffle competently, she'd be a dead cert for the job.
I have no idea who I think should win out of the contenders left. You know in Cards Against Humanity, if you don't like what's in your hand you can chuck the whole lot back into the deck and draw a fresh hand? Anyone else wishing they could do this right now?
Tugendhat was ISTM the Kasich of this particular ratfight, the only voice of relative sanity. How the others were allowed to get away with saying "Boris isn't dishonest, no, he's.. er.. misunderstood" without having to address the elephant in the room that the only reason he was allowed to lie his way through for so long until something tipped that balance is because they were supporting him all the way.
It was Liz Truss's to lose: if she had even managed to waffle competently, she'd be a dead cert for the job.
- El Pollo Diablo
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
- Location: FBPE
Re: Who's next?
Liz Truss is basically a slice of ham made animate, fed on hormones in a basement for several years and shown a Margaret Thatcher compilation video on loop for the entire time. She's more robotic than Theresa May and that shouldn't even be possible. There's a dead-behind-the-eyes nature to every single thing she does - the halting way of speaking, the f.cking weird pauses and smarmy grins, the unbelievably cynical repetition of Thatcher, including how she dressed. Oh, and she's talentless.
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
TBF the wifi was hopeless in the NEC in 2014. That was just her buffering. If you look deep into her eyes (don't look deep into her eyes!) you can see the swirling circles of doom when it happens.El Pollo Diablo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:58 amShe's more robotic than Theresa May ... the f.cking weird pauses and smarmy grins
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8279
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Who's next?
So we were atshpalman wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 3:27 pmSo now it'sshpalman wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:21 amI'll put them in order according to https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng ... ll-results
Rishi Sunak - 101 (up 13)
Penny Mordaunt - 83 (up 16)
Liz Truss - 64 (up 14)
Kemi Badenoch - 49 (up 9)
Tom Tugendhat - 32 (down 5)
Suella Braverman - 27 (down 5)
Rishi Sunak - 115
Penny Mordaunt - 82
Liz Truss - 71
Kemi Badenoch - 58
Tom Tugendhat - 31
"Badenough" obviously just managed to pick up a few letters from some of the candidates who dropped out, outperforming "Mourdaunt" there who's had that extra u for a while now and even managed to lose the other one for a moment there.
Sunak and Truss haven't picked up any letters at all, obviously having names which are simple enough to spell.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk