Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
No not a euphemism nor a medical complaint, but a question explored by Richard Feynman in "Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman": Namely what will a rotary type, Heron's turbine type lawn sprinkler do if you immerse it in water and it sucks instead of blows. Will it go round and if so in what direction?
Will the pressure X Area at the nozzle suck it forward? Or will the momentum change around the bends push it backwards.
Feynman did not directly answer the question in the book, he only reported in the damage and mess he made, actually doing the experiment. I was moved to ask after contemplating the forces on an immersion blender whilst making Yorkshire puddins.
Will the pressure X Area at the nozzle suck it forward? Or will the momentum change around the bends push it backwards.
Feynman did not directly answer the question in the book, he only reported in the damage and mess he made, actually doing the experiment. I was moved to ask after contemplating the forces on an immersion blender whilst making Yorkshire puddins.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
James Gleick's biography of him recounts the experiment and gives the answer. The difference between squirting and sucking is the angular momentum of the water. When it leaves in a jet it has one (with respect to the centre of the sprinkler) when it's sucked in from more or less all directions it doesn't.
So it doesn't go around.
So it doesn't go around.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
Which is what I reasoned, but as events and Youtube videos show, I was wrong.shpalman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:46 pmJames Gleick's biography of him recounts the experiment and gives the answer. The difference between squirting and sucking is the angular momentum of the water. When it leaves in a jet it has one (with respect to the centre of the sprinkler) when it's sucked in from more or less all directions it doesn't.
So it doesn't go around.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:01 pmWhich is what I reasoned, but as events and Youtube videos show, I was wrong. And Wiki too.shpalman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:46 pmJames Gleick's biography of him recounts the experiment and gives the answer. The difference between squirting and sucking is the angular momentum of the water. When it leaves in a jet it has one (with respect to the centre of the sprinkler) when it's sucked in from more or less all directions it doesn't.
So it doesn't go around.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
The puzzle of the steady-state rotation of a reverse sprinkler: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27413727
https://sciencedemonstrations.fas.harva ... -sprinkler
The continuous rotation of the reverse sprinkler has been a puzzle for over two decades. This article presents a series of experiments that demonstrate that a properly designed reverse sprinkler experiences no steady-state torque and does not rotate. Ignoring transients when the flow starts and stops, if any sustained rotation of the reverse sprinkler occurs, it is because a force couple produces a torque accompanied by vortex flow inside the body of the sprinkler. No steady-state rotation occurs if the vortex is suppressed or prevented from forming in the first place. Demonstrative proof is given that an ideal reverse sprinkler does not rotate.
https://sciencedemonstrations.fas.harva ... -sprinkler
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
Hjulet snurrar men hamstern är död.
Re: Feynman's reverse lawn sprinkler.
This was a question on my Physics degree final paper.Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:15 pmNo not a euphemism nor a medical complaint, but a question explored by Richard Feynman in "Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman": Namely what will a rotary type, Heron's turbine type lawn sprinkler do if you immerse it in water and it sucks instead of blows. Will it go round and if so in what direction?
Will the pressure X Area at the nozzle suck it forward? Or will the momentum change around the bends push it backwards.
Feynman did not directly answer the question in the book, he only reported in the damage and mess he made, actually doing the experiment. I was moved to ask after contemplating the forces on an immersion blender whilst making Yorkshire puddins.