I caught a bit of the select committee this morning. Whitty (chief medical officer) said that they would still be releasing location data, but that if numbers increase there might be a 24hour delay so they can make sure they're putting out the right info.Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:34 amAnyway they have done a U-turn and decided to carry on as before.bob sterman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 7:35 pmThe tweet says...Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 5:16 pmSo the government are only going to release infection figures once a week and redacted of geographical information.
https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/12 ... 4407802880
So there's 6 days for those in the know (IE ministers.) to do a nice little bit of insider trading on companies likely to be affected.
"As of today, due to the number of new cases, we will no longer be tweeting information on the location of each new case. Instead, this information will be released centrally in a consolidated format online, once a week. We are working on this now and plan to share on Friday."
Doesn't this mean they will still tweet the numbers (perhaps each day) but just not tweet the locations.
He also said that other countries were being very open about this & pointed out that Singapore released location down to street level, and HongKong has an app that lets you know if you're within 100m of a case. Then he said that down to street level was probably not appropriate here. (Impication being because we can't be trusted not to abuse our neighbours who are ill, I think.)
I've been following the numbers. Cases in Hong Kong & Singapore seem to be increasing more slowly than elsewhere. Does anyone know why? Are they being stricter, are they not testing as many people, are people there being more sensible due to past experiences with SARs? Could the fine-grain location data be helping?