Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
My fear is this thread will run for the next few years and the title will never be changed to "How the Covid-19 vaccine was developed".
On the one hand, massive global effort.
On the other, coronaviruses appear to be particularly tricky.
Is it plausible we will have a vaccine by 30 June 2021?
On the one hand, massive global effort.
On the other, coronaviruses appear to be particularly tricky.
Is it plausible we will have a vaccine by 30 June 2021?
Last edited by Stephanie on Thu May 14, 2020 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Moved from Weighty Matters
Reason: Moved from Weighty Matters
- Gentleman Jim
- Catbabel
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
There are several in phase 1 trial already and with accelerated status, I believe one will emerge sooner rather than later
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Obviously any new vaccine needs to be safe but how effective does it need to be to make it worthwhile going for mass production and immunisation programmes?
Providing protection to, lets say, 10% of the population would still cover a lot of people, but would it be enough to to justify the exercise or will it need to be much higher, say 60% before considered worthwhile?
Given that there won't be enough for everybody straight away what is the best priority order to protect the greatest number of people most quickly, I'm assuming different countries will take their own decisions around this although WHO may make recommendations?
Providing protection to, lets say, 10% of the population would still cover a lot of people, but would it be enough to to justify the exercise or will it need to be much higher, say 60% before considered worthwhile?
Given that there won't be enough for everybody straight away what is the best priority order to protect the greatest number of people most quickly, I'm assuming different countries will take their own decisions around this although WHO may make recommendations?
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
For most people, the effects of infection are manageable, so I would see the priority as not to protect the greatest number, but to protect:kerrya1 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 11:28 amObviously any new vaccine needs to be safe but how effective does it need to be to make it worthwhile going for mass production and immunisation programmes?
Providing protection to, lets say, 10% of the population would still cover a lot of people, but would it be enough to to justify the exercise or will it need to be much higher, say 60% before considered worthwhile?
Given that there won't be enough for everybody straight away what is the best priority order to protect the greatest number of people most quickly, I'm assuming different countries will take their own decisions around this although WHO may make recommendations?
- people most at risk of complications
- people most at risk of spreading infections to those at most risk of complications.
but probably the other way around
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Just to nit-pick.
<nit-pick>
The outbreak is COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease - 2019)
The virus causing this disease outbreak is SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - CoronaVirus - 2)
So the vaccine needs to be against the virus (SARS-CoV-2), not the outbreak (COVID-19).
</nit-pick>
<nit-pick>
The outbreak is COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease - 2019)
The virus causing this disease outbreak is SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - CoronaVirus - 2)
So the vaccine needs to be against the virus (SARS-CoV-2), not the outbreak (COVID-19).
</nit-pick>
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
I'll try to remember that.
Particularly when I'm on a hospital trolley and getting 30 seconds with a doctor for the first and last time, me in delirium rambling about the Covid-19 virus and him saying well actually, Covid-19 is the name of the disease you are dying from and the virus you are cursing is in fact called SARS-CoV-2.
Particularly when I'm on a hospital trolley and getting 30 seconds with a doctor for the first and last time, me in delirium rambling about the Covid-19 virus and him saying well actually, Covid-19 is the name of the disease you are dying from and the virus you are cursing is in fact called SARS-CoV-2.
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Are there vaccines for any other coronaviruses?
There's that cat thing, no vaccine for that. Nor SARS, but perhaps they never tried as it vanished?
And a thing called immune enhancement - the vaccine might trigger a deadly response in the body.
We are all presuming a vaccine in 18 months, but why? Is this a challenge comparable to Apollo or is it more like building a channel tunnel, knowing it can be done but will inevitably take a long time to complete.
There's that cat thing, no vaccine for that. Nor SARS, but perhaps they never tried as it vanished?
And a thing called immune enhancement - the vaccine might trigger a deadly response in the body.
We are all presuming a vaccine in 18 months, but why? Is this a challenge comparable to Apollo or is it more like building a channel tunnel, knowing it can be done but will inevitably take a long time to complete.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
The PLA has already developed a vaccine that is in the the preliminary stages of testing.
There might be some advantages of using the military as test subjects because you dont have to get the same level of ethical approval. the article does not say if they are testing in humans yet, so I am guessing that is not the case.
There might be some advantages of using the military as test subjects because you dont have to get the same level of ethical approval. the article does not say if they are testing in humans yet, so I am guessing that is not the case.
https://www.defenseworld.net/news/26454 ... 9__VaccineLed by PLA major general Chen Wei, the team has now achieved a key progress in developing a vaccine to the novel coronavirus. It includes development of an adenovirus vector vaccine for COVID-19 and a class 1 biological drug with full intellectual property rights, which can be used to treat not only COVID-19 patients, but also people who have been exposed to the virus as an emergency prevention measure, state-run CCTV reported on Tuesday.
"We must strive to bring the vaccine we are working on to clinical trial and application, providing strong technological support for winning this battle," she said.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Great!lpm wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 3:29 pmI'll try to remember that.
Particularly when I'm on a hospital trolley and getting 30 seconds with a doctor for the first and last time, me in delirium rambling about the Covid-19 virus and him saying well actually, Covid-19 is the name of the disease you are dying from and the virus you are cursing is in fact called SARS-CoV-2.
It's important to get ones priorities right, after all. Well done!
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
I once had a GP who would probably actually have done that. One of the old-school who thought that doctors like themselves were something above the common herd.lpm wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 3:29 pmI'll try to remember that.
Particularly when I'm on a hospital trolley and getting 30 seconds with a doctor for the first and last time, me in delirium rambling about the Covid-19 virus and him saying well actually, Covid-19 is the name of the disease you are dying from and the virus you are cursing is in fact called SARS-CoV-2.
[/digression]
Some people call me strange.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
What are the vaccines in phase I trials?Gentleman Jim wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 11:09 amThere are several in phase 1 trial already and with accelerated status, I believe one will emerge sooner rather than later
The CEPI portfolio is all pre-clinical (and they're prob the ones being fastracked as much as is reasonably possible), and the ones listed on marketwatch are all pre-clinical.
Moderna appear to have gone straight to humans without the usual animal model stages, bar some nominal experiments on mice.
Any others out there in humans?
- Stephanie
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2902
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:38 pm
- Location: clinging tenaciously to your buttocks
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Moved a post from here to the other covid thread. Keep this one for vaccine development please
"I got a flu virus named after me 'cause I kissed a bat on a dare."
- Cardinal Fang
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:42 pm
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
What to we make of reports that the Trump administration offered a German medical company "large sums of money" for exclusive access to a Covid-19 vaccine, so that the vaccine would be secured for the US only?
CF
CF
![Image](http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/spinquisition.gif)
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Entirely unsurprising?Cardinal Fang wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 1:24 amWhat to we make of reports that the Trump administration offered a German medical company "large sums of money" for exclusive access to a Covid-19 vaccine, so that the vaccine would be secured for the US only?
CF
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Germany says f.ck right off with that.dyqik wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 1:52 amEntirely unsurprising?Cardinal Fang wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 1:24 amWhat to we make of reports that the Trump administration offered a German medical company "large sums of money" for exclusive access to a Covid-19 vaccine, so that the vaccine would be secured for the US only?
CF
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
bjn, your link above goes to the Guardian.
I prefer the presentation in the FAZ: In German.
Note cooperation through the vaxprovider alliance Cepi. Cepi was started in 2017 with Angela Merkel and Bill Gates pushing for it.
I find the Guardian often, shall we say:sceptical, towards Bill Gates and his initiatives.
I prefer the presentation in the FAZ: In German.
Note cooperation through the vaxprovider alliance Cepi. Cepi was started in 2017 with Angela Merkel and Bill Gates pushing for it.
I find the Guardian often, shall we say:sceptical, towards Bill Gates and his initiatives.
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Thanks BM, but I don't read German.bmforre wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:31 ambjn, your link above goes to the Guardian.
I prefer the presentation in the FAZ: In German.
Note cooperation through the vaxprovider alliance Cepi. Cepi was started in 2017 with Angela Merkel and Bill Gates pushing for it.
I find the Guardian often, shall we say:sceptical, towards Bill Gates and his initiatives.
ETA and google translate isn't helping.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Its behind a pay wall anyway.bjn wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:24 amThanks BM, but I don't read German.bmforre wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:31 ambjn, your link above goes to the Guardian.
I prefer the presentation in the FAZ: In German.
Note cooperation through the vaxprovider alliance Cepi. Cepi was started in 2017 with Angela Merkel and Bill Gates pushing for it.
I find the Guardian often, shall we say:sceptical, towards Bill Gates and his initiatives.
ETA and google translate isn't helping.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- bob sterman
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
- Location: Location Location
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Not strictly a vaccine issue - but does anyone have an idea when we might get an antibody test?
I assume one will be needed to examine the effectiveness of a vaccine - but knowing who has been infected and recovered could have a major impact on the functioning of critical services and society in general?
I assume one will be needed to examine the effectiveness of a vaccine - but knowing who has been infected and recovered could have a major impact on the functioning of critical services and society in general?
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8274
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Takis Biotech is about to start animal testing of a vaccine with the possibility of human testing in the autumn.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
I think, but am not sure, that this thread in Nerd Lab may be relevant SARS-CoV-2 testingbob sterman wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2020 5:37 pmNot strictly a vaccine issue - but does anyone have an idea when we might get an antibody test?
I assume one will be needed to examine the effectiveness of a vaccine - but knowing who has been infected and recovered could have a major impact on the functioning of critical services and society in general?
-
- Catbabel
- Posts: 654
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:59 pm
- Location: Shropshire - Welsh Borders
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Also not a vaccine but french news is discussing the idea that chloroquine may be a cure for the virus.
WOULD CUSTOMERS PLEASE REFRAIN FROM SITTING ON THE COUNTER BY THE BACON SLICER - AS WE'RE GETTING A LITTLE BEHIND IN OUR ORDERS.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
There's quite a few things being considered as mitigation or treatment for this virus. Chloraquine's one of them, and has the advantage of being cheap. There's been discussion of rempresivir, too.
Crucially, anything that's already been approved for something will have a lot less trials to go through. If we already know how it is handled by the human body at what dose and so on, then the only big question is will it reduce the impact of this virus, or work prophylactically against it.
The trials that have already started with vaccine candidates, meanwhile, have to first test that it is safe to give humans the drug at all, before any investigation into efficacy can begin.
Crucially, anything that's already been approved for something will have a lot less trials to go through. If we already know how it is handled by the human body at what dose and so on, then the only big question is will it reduce the impact of this virus, or work prophylactically against it.
The trials that have already started with vaccine candidates, meanwhile, have to first test that it is safe to give humans the drug at all, before any investigation into efficacy can begin.
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Treatment?: that's a possible 'maybe'.
ScienceDirect (2020-03-05): Of chloroquine and COVID-19
Essentially they are politely requesting the Chinese researchers who claim chloroquine works well to release their data, as "this would represent the first successful use of chloroquine in humans for the treatment of an acute viral disease", and while chloroquine works in vitro for several viral diseases, previous trials in vivo (humans) has been equivocal at best, some conditions made worse.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Developing the Covid-19 vaccine
Thanks. I hadn't managed to get the brains together to dig into the details enough, and I suspect a lot of media reports will be wrong for the usual reasons.Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 9:36 pmTreatment?: that's a possible 'maybe'.
ScienceDirect (2020-03-05): Of chloroquine and COVID-19
Essentially they are politely requesting the Chinese researchers who claim chloroquine works well to release their data, as "this would represent the first successful use of chloroquine in humans for the treatment of an acute viral disease", and while chloroquine works in vitro for several viral diseases, previous trials in vivo (humans) has been equivocal at best, some conditions made worse.