Science is f.cked, part 94

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by sTeamTraen » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:51 pm

Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Woodchopper » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:03 pm

Good work!

User avatar
Stupidosaurus
Buzzberry
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:11 am

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Stupidosaurus » Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:44 pm

Congratulations on the masterly restraint and understatement used to describe this stinking sack of rotten entrails masquerading as a scientific paper.

Allo V Psycho
Catbabel
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:18 am

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Allo V Psycho » Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:38 am

Just seen this. Still laughing/shaking head in dismay.

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by sTeamTraen » Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:38 pm

Hooray! It's been retracted!
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by Martin Y » Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:52 pm

Succinctly damning description in the retraction notice: "... results described in the Article, in particular the outcomes of statistical analyses, are internally inconsistent and that some results are mathematically impossible"

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: Science is f.cked, part 94

Post by sTeamTraen » Thu Jun 04, 2020 6:10 pm

Martin Y wrote:
Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:52 pm
Succinctly damning description in the retraction notice: "... results described in the Article, in particular the outcomes of statistical analyses, are internally inconsistent and that some results are mathematically impossible"
It was nice of them to thank the person who brought the issues to their attention, too.

Oh, wait, they didn't do that. The information just landed on their desk through a stargate.
Something something hammer something something nail

Post Reply