Covid phone tracking
-
- Catbabel
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:59 pm
- Location: Shropshire - Welsh Borders
Re: Covid phone tracking
But, even if it works, isn't there a huge hole in the system - a proportion of the population don't have smart phones and I suspect (without evidence) that many of those are older people - the very ones who are among the most vulnerable ??
If you bring your kids up to think for themselves, you can't complain when they do.
Re: Covid phone tracking
I came here to post the same thing.lpm wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 10:30 amI know it's The Register, which can be sh.t, but this was interesting on the UK NHS branded app. Move to the Isle of Wight to experience it now.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/0 ... virus_app/
I was wondering how this was supposed to work. My phone battery is a bit shite so I only turn on Bluetooth when I want to transfer data from my Garmin (once a day or so). Looks like even if I leave it on all the time it still won't work so what's the point?
I also have two phones (personal and work) but often only carry one of them (work phone stays in my work bag on evenings/weekends) so, if it worked, I'd need it installed on both phones. However, overnight they will be in close proximity for a long time so would be a contact. That could lead to some interesting skewing of data depending on how prevalent it is to have multiple phones.
briefly Stephanie's favourite user
Re: Covid phone tracking
Why is this going ahead? (At least in Isle of Wight)
head of NHS digital says
“Even if the take-up rate is 20%, that gives us important insights into how the virus is spreading. At 40 or 50% it will make a big difference.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ncock-says
How is 20% take up useful? Presumably that's 20% of smartphone owners, which on IoW is going to be, what, 70% of the pop max (taking away kids <14 and half the >65s)?
And the fewer phones there are, the less they are going to be near each other, and even if they are the tech doesn't allow them to speak to each other most of the time. What are they going to be able to find in that kind of ropey data, if they get any at all?
How is this even a good idea? How did they get on in Australia with their (bluetooth-based) app?
head of NHS digital says
“Even if the take-up rate is 20%, that gives us important insights into how the virus is spreading. At 40 or 50% it will make a big difference.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ncock-says
How is 20% take up useful? Presumably that's 20% of smartphone owners, which on IoW is going to be, what, 70% of the pop max (taking away kids <14 and half the >65s)?
And the fewer phones there are, the less they are going to be near each other, and even if they are the tech doesn't allow them to speak to each other most of the time. What are they going to be able to find in that kind of ropey data, if they get any at all?
How is this even a good idea? How did they get on in Australia with their (bluetooth-based) app?
Re: Covid phone tracking
the thing with big data is that you can use multiple data sets to de-anonymise data - I notice the UK has a constant number that identifies the user whereas the google / apple proposal the identifier changes each day. Once you crack who the identifier is, (via pattern matching with other data sets) you have access to all their movements.
Re: Covid phone tracking
badger asked how Australia is getting on with it's app. So far, about 4.4m people have downloaded it, so that's about 20% of the population, and most of them downloaded it in the first few days of release. They've only just released the draft legislation so I assume there will be another uptick in downloads once the legislation is passed.
I've got the Australian app on my android phone and I have obviously no clue about what's happening with the data it's collecting but it leaves a little notification up that tells me it's scanning, regardless of whether my phone is locked. I haven't touched it since I installed it so it at least claims to be scanning while in the background. Whenever I turn off Bluetooth, the notification turns to an exclamation mark and asks me to turn Bluetooth back on.
I use Bluetooth headphones a lot of the day anyway so I haven't noticed any effect on battery life.
There are issues here with iPhones around it running in the background or while locked, which they claim are being solved but I don't know how.
The context is very different here too. Modelling suggests that our testing and tracing regime is picking up close to 100% of all cases, so this is an adjunct to that. I don't think the UK is anywhere close to having they level of control over the virus. The app presumably can't replace proper contact tracing unless you could get every human to install it and run it at all times.
I think of it as like the flutracking surveys that I do every week. It will likely track trends that are important and potentially give some useful data on places where transmission is likely - if it's showing that in the two weeks before I tested positive, I was spending lots of time with X number of people and the contract tracers ask me what I was doing at those times, it might help quantify the risks of particular activities. Maybe.
If 40% take up makes a material difference to contact tracing efforts and perhaps to refining social distancing rules, I'm happy to use my relative boringness to help. If I were a member of a vulnerability minority, I might be more cautious, even though I'd be more vulnerable to covid as well as to malign government actions.
I've got the Australian app on my android phone and I have obviously no clue about what's happening with the data it's collecting but it leaves a little notification up that tells me it's scanning, regardless of whether my phone is locked. I haven't touched it since I installed it so it at least claims to be scanning while in the background. Whenever I turn off Bluetooth, the notification turns to an exclamation mark and asks me to turn Bluetooth back on.
I use Bluetooth headphones a lot of the day anyway so I haven't noticed any effect on battery life.
There are issues here with iPhones around it running in the background or while locked, which they claim are being solved but I don't know how.
The context is very different here too. Modelling suggests that our testing and tracing regime is picking up close to 100% of all cases, so this is an adjunct to that. I don't think the UK is anywhere close to having they level of control over the virus. The app presumably can't replace proper contact tracing unless you could get every human to install it and run it at all times.
I think of it as like the flutracking surveys that I do every week. It will likely track trends that are important and potentially give some useful data on places where transmission is likely - if it's showing that in the two weeks before I tested positive, I was spending lots of time with X number of people and the contract tracers ask me what I was doing at those times, it might help quantify the risks of particular activities. Maybe.
If 40% take up makes a material difference to contact tracing efforts and perhaps to refining social distancing rules, I'm happy to use my relative boringness to help. If I were a member of a vulnerability minority, I might be more cautious, even though I'd be more vulnerable to covid as well as to malign government actions.
Re: Covid phone tracking
As regards the Bluetooth issue (visibility when not active etc.), I've seen it said that the app uses Bluetooth LE, which is designed for use in background and intermittent apps.
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/technology-52551273
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/technology-52551273
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Covid phone tracking
I have bluetooth on all the time on my phone to keep my smartwatch connected. It is absolutely not a problem. The app (on Android) runs in the notification bar.Gfamily wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 7:43 amAs regards the Bluetooth issue (visibility when not active etc.), I've seen it said that the app uses Bluetooth LE, which is designed for use in background and intermittent apps.
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/technology-52551273
"Furthermore, the score is calculated by taking into account all the risky interactions an app user has had over a period of two weeks".
The user will have symptoms by then, if they are ever going to have symptoms. So what's the point of waiting two weeks?
Also, two weeks is a long time in an exponentially-growing outbreak.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7317
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Covid phone tracking
Yes, the smartphone apps make sense where there is a realistic ambition to test everyone who might be infected. Its difficult to see what good it would do in the UK if someone was notified they are at risk but couldn't get tested.Squeak wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 1:51 amThe context is very different here too. Modelling suggests that our testing and tracing regime is picking up close to 100% of all cases, so this is an adjunct to that. I don't think the UK is anywhere close to having they level of control over the virus. The app presumably can't replace proper contact tracing unless you could get every human to install it and run it at all times.
Re: Covid phone tracking
I interpret it to mean that the app only takes the last two weeks of contacts into account in the score. If you don't have symptoms, any contacts before then are irrelevant. If your score indicates you have had serious contact, the app swould presumably recommend taking extra steps to ensure you don't spread it further just in case you are infected but not yet symptomatic.shpalman wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 7:59 am"Furthermore, the score is calculated by taking into account all the risky interactions an app user has had over a period of two weeks".
The user will have symptoms by then, if they are ever going to have symptoms. So what's the point of waiting two weeks?
Also, two weeks is a long time in an exponentially-growing outbreak.
Jaap's Page: https://www.jaapsch.net/
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Covid phone tracking
If you had a risky contact more than two weeks ago then you should already have been notified about that, once, and then your score should reset based on what you do about it.jaap wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 10:24 amI interpret it to mean that the app only takes the last two weeks of contacts into account in the score. If you don't have symptoms, any contacts before then are irrelevant. If your score indicates you have had serious contact, the app swould presumably recommend taking extra steps to ensure you don't spread it further just in case you are infected but not yet symptomatic.shpalman wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 7:59 am"Furthermore, the score is calculated by taking into account all the risky interactions an app user has had over a period of two weeks".
The user will have symptoms by then, if they are ever going to have symptoms. So what's the point of waiting two weeks?
Also, two weeks is a long time in an exponentially-growing outbreak.
ETA: ok what I think it's implying is that your risk is calculated as a moving average over the past two weeks and if at any point it goes over threshold then I suppose you would get the notification.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Covid phone tracking
Thanks Squeak and others. Will be interesting to see how successful the Bluetooth workarounds are. Waking up, finding alien phones and swapping IDs is not the same as being connected to a smartwatch all day that you've already given permission to.
If they can still get something useful even if there's low take up then great, I just hope it's good data for the price.
If they can still get something useful even if there's low take up then great, I just hope it's good data for the price.
Re: Covid phone tracking
I've posted a summary of how the app works (not mine) on the Scrutineers FB page.
It's based on the National Cyber Security Centre assessment paper issued on Sunday
https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/files/NHS-app-s ... 20V0.1.pdf
It's based on the National Cyber Security Centre assessment paper issued on Sunday
https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/files/NHS-app-s ... 20V0.1.pdf
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: Covid phone tracking
The more I think about this, the more troubling the app seems to me in a society that has an uncontrolled outbreak. If i got a warning for each of ny commutes in the past fortnight, or even once a week, I'd be pretty anxious to get tested. An app that tells me I need to be tested every day is anxiety-inducing in a society where I can get regular tests. In a society where I can't get those tests, that sounds like a recipe for civil unrest.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 9:28 amYes, the smartphone apps make sense where there is a realistic ambition to test everyone who might be infected. Its difficult to see what good it would do in the UK if someone was notified they are at risk but couldn't get tested.Squeak wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 1:51 amThe context is very different here too. Modelling suggests that our testing and tracing regime is picking up close to 100% of all cases, so this is an adjunct to that. I don't think the UK is anywhere close to having they level of control over the virus. The app presumably can't replace proper contact tracing unless you could get every human to install it and run it at all times.
A regular phone message that makes the government's failures very, very salient seems politically brave.
On technical matters, our senate committee yesterday got told that the problems with iPhones are not yet solved and my native reading seems to hunt they were just need Apple to rebuild some key aspects of their architecture for all their old models and it will be fine. A piece of cake.
Also, the data aren't yet accessible to health authorities so it's not actually doing anything useful yet.
Re: Covid phone tracking
Psythor says it won't work, but someone says it will work, so maybe it will work, but the NHS might abandon it, but maybe they won't:
https://twitter.com/Psythor/status/1258327399391006720
https://twitter.com/Psythor/status/1258327399391006720
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7317
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Covid phone tracking
https://www.ft.com/content/446df516-4ec ... pe=nongiftUK starts to build second contact tracing app
NHS team is told to build alternative on system being developed by Apple and Google
The NHS has already begun building a second smartphone app to trace the spread of the coronavirus, after criticism of the first app it launched this week on the Isle of Wight.
The second NHS app will use technology provided by Google and Apple and is being developed “in parallel”, in case politicians decide to make a switch, according to two people familiar with the situation.
Matthew Gould, head of NHSX, the UK health service’s innovation arm, gave the go-ahead to the new project earlier this week.
The decision to build an alternative to the NHS’s original app, which gathers more data in a central database, came after pressure within the government over the technical and ethical issues of its initial approach.
One person involved said that talks with Apple and Google had intensified in the past few days, noting a sharp change of tack from last week to more “cordial and constructive” discussions “exploring how we might change course”.
The person said that, as testing had continued, the practicalities of making the first app work had become increasingly apparent. He noted a particular problem over its compatibility with the Apple iPhone, as well as broader worries about the implications for battery life. “These technical details end up being quite important,” he said.
[...]
One person involved in the development of the app said NHSX was now feeling increasing pressure from parliament and privacy campaigners, despite Mr Levy’s assurances. A technical analysis of the app by Privacy International, published on Thursday, found that a loophole in app software could allow authorities access to detailed location data about users in future.
MPs on parliament’s human rights committee also said on Thursday that they had “significant concerns” about the app and called for new legislation guaranteeing data and human rights protections. Harriet Harman, the committee chair, said promises from ministers about privacy were not enough.
NHSX said: “We’ve been working with Apple and Google throughout the app’s development and it’s quite right and normal to continue to refine the app.”
Re: Covid phone tracking
The source code for the UK app has been released and here's a summary of what people who've looked at it say about it
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
Re: Covid phone tracking
I get that the app is not designed to store location data so that people feel their privacy is protected and are thus more likely to download it. But it strikes me that without location data - or at least the ability to gather it later once permission is given - it's a bit limited.
Sure, when a user gets Covid, anyone else with the app who's been in contact will get a notification. But what about all the contacts that don't have the app? To trace & track those, which may be a sizable portion if the app doesn't take off, you'll need old-fashioned contact tracing and that requires knowing when and where the person went over the last week or so.
I'd be far more confident in my phone remembering everywhere I've been than me.
(I'm pretty cautious about these things & usually have location data turned completely off, but I'd happily turn it on for contact tracing purposes.)
Sure, when a user gets Covid, anyone else with the app who's been in contact will get a notification. But what about all the contacts that don't have the app? To trace & track those, which may be a sizable portion if the app doesn't take off, you'll need old-fashioned contact tracing and that requires knowing when and where the person went over the last week or so.
I'd be far more confident in my phone remembering everywhere I've been than me.
(I'm pretty cautious about these things & usually have location data turned completely off, but I'd happily turn it on for contact tracing purposes.)
Re: Covid phone tracking
More like 60%. The IoW population is heavily skewed towards the elderly. And even then probably further <60% than one might expect, because while the elderly are often wealthy retirees, the adults there are often in seasonal employment with the low pay that entails.badger wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 1:50 pmWhy is this going ahead? (At least in Isle of Wight)
head of NHS digital says
“Even if the take-up rate is 20%, that gives us important insights into how the virus is spreading. At 40 or 50% it will make a big difference.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ncock-says
How is 20% take up useful? Presumably that's 20% of smartphone owners, which on IoW is going to be, what, 70% of the pop max (taking away kids <14 and half the >65s)?
Well, it can demonstrate herd immunity nicely. Think of people without the app running at all times as the immune
Re: Covid phone tracking
I bet my phone company are keeping those records of where I've been anyway. Every interaction of my phone with a mast will be recorded & could be used to triangulate my movements if anyone really wanted to.raven wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:51 pmI get that the app is not designed to store location data so that people feel their privacy is protected and are thus more likely to download it. But it strikes me that without location data - or at least the ability to gather it later once permission is given - it's a bit limited.
Sure, when a user gets Covid, anyone else with the app who's been in contact will get a notification. But what about all the contacts that don't have the app? To trace & track those, which may be a sizable portion if the app doesn't take off, you'll need old-fashioned contact tracing and that requires knowing when and where the person went over the last week or so.
I'd be far more confident in my phone remembering everywhere I've been than me.
(I'm pretty cautious about these things & usually have location data turned completely off, but I'd happily turn it on for contact tracing purposes.)
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Covid phone tracking
Information like that has certainly been used (in an anonymised sense) in Italy to get an idea of how many people were making long trips despite the lockdown.tom p wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 3:44 pmI bet my phone company are keeping those records of where I've been anyway. Every interaction of my phone with a mast will be recorded & could be used to triangulate my movements if anyone really wanted to.raven wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:51 pmI get that the app is not designed to store location data so that people feel their privacy is protected and are thus more likely to download it. But it strikes me that without location data - or at least the ability to gather it later once permission is given - it's a bit limited.
Sure, when a user gets Covid, anyone else with the app who's been in contact will get a notification. But what about all the contacts that don't have the app? To trace & track those, which may be a sizable portion if the app doesn't take off, you'll need old-fashioned contact tracing and that requires knowing when and where the person went over the last week or so.
I'd be far more confident in my phone remembering everywhere I've been than me.
(I'm pretty cautious about these things & usually have location data turned completely off, but I'd happily turn it on for contact tracing purposes.)
And sometimes it's used by the forces of order to try to find people who've gone missing.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7317
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Covid phone tracking
It was used in Sweden to identify the members of a criminal gang who used burner phones.shpalman wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 5:07 pmInformation like that has certainly been used (in an anonymised sense) in Italy to get an idea of how many people were making long trips despite the lockdown.tom p wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 3:44 pmI bet my phone company are keeping those records of where I've been anyway. Every interaction of my phone with a mast will be recorded & could be used to triangulate my movements if anyone really wanted to.raven wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:51 pmI get that the app is not designed to store location data so that people feel their privacy is protected and are thus more likely to download it. But it strikes me that without location data - or at least the ability to gather it later once permission is given - it's a bit limited.
Sure, when a user gets Covid, anyone else with the app who's been in contact will get a notification. But what about all the contacts that don't have the app? To trace & track those, which may be a sizable portion if the app doesn't take off, you'll need old-fashioned contact tracing and that requires knowing when and where the person went over the last week or so.
I'd be far more confident in my phone remembering everywhere I've been than me.
(I'm pretty cautious about these things & usually have location data turned completely off, but I'd happily turn it on for contact tracing purposes.)
And sometimes it's used by the forces of order to try to find people who've gone missing.
https://books.google.no/books?id=gCqODw ... &q&f=false
Re: Covid phone tracking
Telenor, a big Norwegian telecom company, have already done some work on tracking movement within Norway to predict how Covid-19 might spread. Anonymised by using groups of 20, they say:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0893psr
Also, Click did a nice overview of contact tracing using phones here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p08bbhz7
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0893psr
Also, Click did a nice overview of contact tracing using phones here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p08bbhz7
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Covid phone tracking
The UK accidentally left secret plans for its COVID-19 contact-tracing app on an open Google Drive
Not sure why they should be secret in the first place but, still, face-elbow.
Not sure why they should be secret in the first place but, still, face-elbow.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: Covid phone tracking
I can quite understand how this happened, given the limitations of Google Drive. They presumably used the "Anyone with the link can see" (or comment, or edit) feature for some of the documents, which is in itself fairly secure since the link appears to consist of 42 alphanumeric digits, corresponding to a 256-bit GUID (you would need to wait until the heat death of many universes to generate all the possibilities, even if every atom in every universe was a computer). It seems that they also had a master document with links to other documents whose links hadn't been shared in that way, so that only the few specific accounts who were authorised to see them could follow those links. All secure so far. The problem came when they included the doc with the "Anyone with the link can see" link in among the others. This is pretty hard to catch, because the links look the same whether or not they are "Anyone can access" (you'd have to log in with a spare, "naive" Gmail account on another browser to check it), so I can see how it happened. Maybe Google could add a feature so that "Anyone can access" GUIDs all start with ZZ or something.shpalman wrote: ↑Thu May 14, 2020 12:13 pmThe UK accidentally left secret plans for its COVID-19 contact-tracing app on an open Google Drive
Not sure why they should be secret in the first place but, still, face-elbow.
The more general problem for any large organisation is that Google Docs and other free apps are extraordinarily tempting (they work reliably, they have cool features --- especially Docs, which sometimes feels miraculous as multiple people work on a text simultaneously, and you may well already be using them outside work, so you don't have to train anyone). It would be essentially impossible for a government to specify and develop anything as smart as that with security on top. Plus, Google isn't interested in making money from software, so you probably couldn't ask them to make a secure version (and they would probably tell you that trying to do so with Javascript in an inherently insecure browser is a bad idea, so now you have to get them to make a secure version of Chrome too).
So for not-especially-secret documents, destined to become part of (or shape discussion around) social policy rather than plan the location of Trident submarines, and where the worst that can happen if they leak is embarrassment, and many of the people working on them don't have much in the way of formal security clearance or training in how to do IT securely in 2020, I don't think it's a particularly huge problem. Certainly it could have happened to anybody, and the alternative would probably have been to have a bunch of people centralised with each other in a smallish room --- news of that leaking out might have been even more embarrassing.
Something something hammer something something nail
- Gentleman Jim
- Catbabel
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Re: Covid phone tracking
What nobody has explained is, since the trial is on Isle of Wight, do you push Button A or B if you are infected?
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.