Fascist China
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Fascist China
The fascist government of China have just broken every pledge made re: "One Country, Two Systems" when Hong Kong was abandoned to them over twenty years ago. They are disregarding the basic law of Hong Kong, and imposing their own fascist system while the rest of the world is battling a pandemic.
I am utterly terrified at the possible - and likely - fate of those brave people who protested so peacefully and convincingly over the last year. Ultimately, China knew they were losing the argument, losing the elections. They confirmed it with this vile power grab, just as they confirmed their guilt re: coronavirus by trying to suppress an independent inquiry.
I am utterly terrified at the possible - and likely - fate of those brave people who protested so peacefully and convincingly over the last year. Ultimately, China knew they were losing the argument, losing the elections. They confirmed it with this vile power grab, just as they confirmed their guilt re: coronavirus by trying to suppress an independent inquiry.
- individualmember
- Catbabel
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:26 pm
Re: Fascist China
This is tangential to the point of the thread, but I wonder if anyone else feels rather uncomfortable with the word fascist in Fascist China?
I mean it’s nationalist, authoritarian and underpinned with the threat of violence, which is kinda the definition of fascist, but, but, but...
the word fascist is so overused as a general term of abuse for things the speaker (ok, writer as it’s messages on social media where I see it) doesn’t like that I wonder if there’s a better word available, one that doesn’t remind me of knee jerk reactions by jerks, if you see what I mean.
Or am I just talking bollocks?
I mean it’s nationalist, authoritarian and underpinned with the threat of violence, which is kinda the definition of fascist, but, but, but...
the word fascist is so overused as a general term of abuse for things the speaker (ok, writer as it’s messages on social media where I see it) doesn’t like that I wonder if there’s a better word available, one that doesn’t remind me of knee jerk reactions by jerks, if you see what I mean.
Or am I just talking bollocks?
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Fascist China
I can see where you are coming from, but I did choose my words carefully.individualmember wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 1:14 pmThis is tangential to the point of the thread, but I wonder if anyone else feels rather uncomfortable with the word fascist in Fascist China?
I mean it’s nationalist, authoritarian and underpinned with the threat of violence, which is kinda the definition of fascist, but, but, but...
the word fascist is so overused as a general term of abuse for things the speaker (ok, writer as it’s messages on social media where I see it) doesn’t like that I wonder if there’s a better word available, one that doesn’t remind me of knee jerk reactions by jerks, if you see what I mean.
Or am I just talking bollocks?
I've often seen people use Dr. Lawrence Britt's 14 Characteristics of Fascism as a benchmark for what a fascist regime is. Here's a link - https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html
We can go through them one by one.
- Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Supremacy of the Military
Rampant Sexism
Controlled Mass Media
Obsession with National Security
Religion and Government are Intertwined
Corporate Power is Protected
Labor Power is Suppressed
Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fraudulent Elections
As for why it is important to confront the fascist nature of the Chinese regime, it is because a lot of people who would normally vehemently oppose fascism have a blind spot for either the CCP in particular, or nonwestern regimes in general. We've had a poster post-and-running Chinese propaganda - the cringey, lie-filled video in this link was posted, then deleted because of the backlast, to twitter by the Chinese Mission to the EU before it was posted here - and most people have just ignored it in a way they wouldn't if someone advocated Mussolini's Italy, the hard right in this country, or Donald Trump.
The Chinese regime is doing more than merely sabre rattling and making preposterous maritime claims; in response to Australia's call for an independent investigation into COVID-19's origins, they have threatened tariffs on Australia, eg 80% on barley. They continue to censor and spread disinformation and continue to disappear whistleblowers and bloggers. Their heavy-handed and thuggish abrogation of agreements with Hong Kong evokes Germany's annexations and abrogations in the 30s. They are systematically attempting to destroy the Uighurs, with masses of disappearances, concentration camps and forced labour.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
It'll be going on a lot less normally now the fascist CCP has decided to ignore their "one country, two systems" promises and impose its own law directly.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:28 pmMate in HK, said he was lucky he bought TP before the pandemic, but since has complained of various shortages including liquid soap. He says life is going on pretty much normally since then as long as you wear a mask.FlammableFlower wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 7:54 amThere were definitely toilet roll shortages in Hong Kong. I can't find it (on my phone), but there was a news article on panic buying and a toilet roll delivery bring hijacked by a criminal gang to sell on the black market. And that was before definitely pre-lockdown and panic buying in this country.
It seems to have been a ripple-like effect and once enough people are in it then spreads rapidly. Also the waves of different products getting sold out. First toilet roll, then pasta, rice and tinned goods. Then flour. I can remember going out each week to shop and one week thinking, "oh there's loads of x" and the next week, it'd all be empty.
Mod note: this post was moved from "Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?" in the Pandemic Arena.
- individualmember
- Catbabel
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:26 pm
Re: Fascist China
That is a useful link, thanks, I’m bookmarking it for future use.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:23 pmI've often seen people use Dr. Lawrence Britt's 14 Characteristics of Fascism as a benchmark for what a fascist regime is. Here's a link - https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html
I didn’t mean to criticise your choice of words personally, it’s that I’ve seen it enough times to think it’s becoming a meme already.
Re: Fascist China
Does China bother with fraudulent elections? Asking for my own edification...EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:23 pmI can see where you are coming from, but I did choose my words carefully.individualmember wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 1:14 pmThis is tangential to the point of the thread, but I wonder if anyone else feels rather uncomfortable with the word fascist in Fascist China?
I mean it’s nationalist, authoritarian and underpinned with the threat of violence, which is kinda the definition of fascist, but, but, but...
the word fascist is so overused as a general term of abuse for things the speaker (ok, writer as it’s messages on social media where I see it) doesn’t like that I wonder if there’s a better word available, one that doesn’t remind me of knee jerk reactions by jerks, if you see what I mean.
Or am I just talking bollocks?
I've often seen people use Dr. Lawrence Britt's 14 Characteristics of Fascism as a benchmark for what a fascist regime is. Here's a link - https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html
We can go through them one by one.
There's explanations of what Dr. Britt meant by each at the link, although most are self-evident. I can't see a single one China does not meet.
- Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Supremacy of the Military
Rampant Sexism
Controlled Mass Media
Obsession with National Security
Religion and Government are Intertwined
Corporate Power is Protected
Labor Power is Suppressed
Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fraudulent Elections
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Fascist China
Dr. Britt wrote the list while talking about Mussolini's Italy, Hitler's Germany, Franco's Spain, Suharto's Indonesia and Pinochet's Chile. I'd argue fraudulent or absent elections would make more sense.dyqik wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 3:14 pmDoes China bother with fraudulent elections? Asking for my own edification...EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:23 pmI can see where you are coming from, but I did choose my words carefully.individualmember wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 1:14 pmThis is tangential to the point of the thread, but I wonder if anyone else feels rather uncomfortable with the word fascist in Fascist China?
I mean it’s nationalist, authoritarian and underpinned with the threat of violence, which is kinda the definition of fascist, but, but, but...
the word fascist is so overused as a general term of abuse for things the speaker (ok, writer as it’s messages on social media where I see it) doesn’t like that I wonder if there’s a better word available, one that doesn’t remind me of knee jerk reactions by jerks, if you see what I mean.
Or am I just talking bollocks?
I've often seen people use Dr. Lawrence Britt's 14 Characteristics of Fascism as a benchmark for what a fascist regime is. Here's a link - https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html
We can go through them one by one.
There's explanations of what Dr. Britt meant by each at the link, although most are self-evident. I can't see a single one China does not meet.
- Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Supremacy of the Military
Rampant Sexism
Controlled Mass Media
Obsession with National Security
Religion and Government are Intertwined
Corporate Power is Protected
Labor Power is Suppressed
Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fraudulent Elections
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
He is looking forward to being able to go to Central without being tear gassed or fire bombed.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:34 pmIt'll be going on a lot less normally now the fascist CCP has decided to ignore their "one country, two systems" promises and impose its own law directly.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:28 pmMate in HK, said he was lucky he bought TP before the pandemic, but since has complained of various shortages including liquid soap. He says life is going on pretty much normally since then as long as you wear a mask.FlammableFlower wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 7:54 amThere were definitely toilet roll shortages in Hong Kong. I can't find it (on my phone), but there was a news article on panic buying and a toilet roll delivery bring hijacked by a criminal gang to sell on the black market. And that was before definitely pre-lockdown and panic buying in this country.
It seems to have been a ripple-like effect and once enough people are in it then spreads rapidly. Also the waves of different products getting sold out. First toilet roll, then pasta, rice and tinned goods. Then flour. I can remember going out each week to shop and one week thinking, "oh there's loads of x" and the next week, it'd all be empty.
Mod note: this post was moved from "Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?" in the Pandemic Arena.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Fascist China
Most of those conditions would apply to Trump's America or Boris Britain.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Fascist China
If you want to criticise Johnson or Trump, do so, but they aren't, despite their myriad ills, on the same level as China for abuses.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 4:38 pmMost of those conditions would apply to Trump's America or Boris Britain.
Indeed, one of the most damning things one can say about Trump is he appears to wish he had the anti-democratic and coercive powers Xi's regime already has and uses.
Let's do a comparison;
Johnson's government spins and uses friendly journalists to smear opponents while lying constantly.
Trump's berates journalists from the rostrum and calls impotently for his 2016 opponent to be locked up.
CCP's China has no free press, people perceived to be critical of government and people who document things CCP wish hidden disappear.
So it's clear all you are doing here is pathetic whataboutery. Akin to posting in response to people condemning a mass murderer that other people totally unrelated to the subject have occasionally committed assault and battery. If this is the only defense you have for the totalitarian regime of the CCP, why do you post their propaganda?
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
Well done, the bootlicker for totalitarians has found, invented, or misrepresented another bootlicker for totalitarians.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 4:34 pmHe is looking forward to being able to go to Central without being tear gassed or fire bombed.EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:34 pmIt'll be going on a lot less normally now the fascist CCP has decided to ignore their "one country, two systems" promises and impose its own law directly.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:28 pm
Mate in HK, said he was lucky he bought TP before the pandemic, but since has complained of various shortages including liquid soap. He says life is going on pretty much normally since then as long as you wear a mask.
The teargas, beatings and violence came from the regime, and pro-Beijing triads.
The protesters were overwhelmingly peaceful and decent.
The attitude of Hong Kongers was demonstrated clearly in the local elections in november, when, with an unprecedented large turnout, pro-democracy candidates triumphed over regime stooges and won six times as many seats as the pro-Beijing candidates.
Mod note: this post and subsequent replies were moved from "Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?" in the Pandemic Arena.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
The Hong Kong protests were to a large part funded and encouraged by the CIA and the Five Eyes.
Anyway that is not the point of this thread. China and HK locked down at a point where they could save numerous lives. The UK's fatalities will end up being 10 or 20 times China's.
Anyway that is not the point of this thread. China and HK locked down at a point where they could save numerous lives. The UK's fatalities will end up being 10 or 20 times China's.
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
f.ck off, you patronising conspiracy-theorist tw.t. Hong Kong's protests were because Honk Kongers are terrified of the Chinese regime treating them in the same way it treats those in mainland China and occupied Tibet.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:12 pmThe Hong Kong protests were to a large part funded and encouraged by the CIA and the Five Eyes.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
Lucifer, you are so cute when you're angry..EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:40 pmf.ck off, you patronising conspiracy-theorist tw.t. Hong Kong's protests were because Honk Kongers are terrified of the Chinese regime treating them in the same way it treats those in mainland China and occupied Tibet.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:12 pmThe Hong Kong protests were to a large part funded and encouraged by the CIA and the Five Eyes.
https://thegrayzone.com/2019/08/17/hong ... -violence/Trump’s befuddlement might be understandable considering the carefully managed narrative of the US government and its unofficial media apparatus, which have portrayed the protests as an organic “pro-democracy” expression of grassroots youth. However, a look beneath the surface of this oversimplified, made-for-television script reveals that the ferociously anti-Chinese network behind the demonstrations has been cultivated with the help of millions of dollars from the US government, as well as a Washington-linked local media tycoon.
Mods, can we move this to the weighty matters board, away from the coronavirus board?
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
Yes.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 7:28 pmMods, can we move this to the weighty matters board, away from the coronavirus board?
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Could an earlier lockdown have saved 30,000?
Yeah, I get angry with fascist propaganda. That's not exactly a failing, now, is it? Certainly not a failing like posting it is.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 7:28 pmLucifer, you are so cute when you're angry..EACLucifer wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:40 pmf.ck off, you patronising conspiracy-theorist tw.t. Hong Kong's protests were because Honk Kongers are terrified of the Chinese regime treating them in the same way it treats those in mainland China and occupied Tibet.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:12 pmThe Hong Kong protests were to a large part funded and encouraged by the CIA and the Five Eyes.
I don't care if your pro-CCP shite is sincere or not. If you f.ck a pig ironically or to see who is annoyed by you f.cking a pig, or because ou were really attracted to the pig, you are still a pigfucker.
Wait, you think quoting Max Blumenthal's site is going to make you look like less of a conspiracy theorist? He's widely regarded as as a dishonest propagandist, inc apparently profiting financially after shilling for Assad.https://thegrayzone.com/2019/08/17/hong ... -violence/Trump’s befuddlement might be understandable considering the carefully managed narrative of the US government and its unofficial media apparatus, which have portrayed the protests as an organic “pro-democracy” expression of grassroots youth. However, a look beneath the surface of this oversimplified, made-for-television script reveals that the ferociously anti-Chinese network behind the demonstrations has been cultivated with the help of millions of dollars from the US government, as well as a Washington-linked local media tycoon.
I'd support moving this also.Mods, can we move this to the weighty matters board, away from the coronavirus board?
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:23 pm
Re: Fascist China
Lucifer, do you think there are some situations where a leftist authoritarian government can do more to help the general population than a post-imperialist, cronyist, pseudo-democracy?
Masking forever
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
Putin is a monster.
Russian socialism will rise again
- EACLucifer
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:49 am
- Location: In Sumerian Haze
Re: Fascist China
That isn't the f.cking question, because those are not very accurate descriptors of any of the countries we have mentioned. China is not functionally leftist and has not been so for a long time. Instead, corporate power is protected, eg, by arresting and detaining arbitrarily Canadians to try and force Canada to release a dubious Huiwei exec.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 8:25 pmLucifer, do you think there are some situations where a leftist authoritarian government can do more to help the general population than a post-imperialist, cronyist, pseudo-democracy?
China initially suppressed news of the outbreak. Bloggers and journalists have disappeared for discussing it. Mere mention of SAR symptoms on a group chat of healthcare workers saw a doctor threatened by the police. Had they been open, there may have been more done both within China - it's hard to social distance when you don't know there's a pandemic on - and it's spread out through nearby countries could have been limited better, although the democracies of Souyth Korea and Taiwan did a good job anyway. We don't know what the cost of that delay is, but it could potentially be as high as every single infection outside China and a lot of those within.
And the leading candidate for the origin of this disease in the first place is a wildlife market, something long recognised as extremely dangerous - aside from fuelling the illegal trade in endangered species to cater to ignorant woo - but allowed to continue by the corrupt and cronyist Chinese regime.
It is common for advocates of fascism to argue about an efficient but authoritarian state vs an inefficient free one, but it is a myth, and a dangerous one at that. Mussolini did not in fact make the trains run on time, he merely claimed he did. There is a gulf between fascist propaganda and fascist practise.
But even if we were to say they had handled things well - which they have not - this is a thread that I started in response to their appalling abrogation of their promises to Hong Kong. They knew that Hong Kong was increasingly opposed to them from the elections in November. That, and the eyes of the world being on their own problems, is why they broke that promise now. If Hong Kong opened up again as it had been before, Xi's pathetic ego would have taken further hits from the vibrant, courageous protestors.
And Hong Kong is hardly the only place they are doing wrong. I have repeatedly challenged you on China's attempts to eradicate the Uighurs' culture. Hundreds of thousands have been forced into concentration camps. Graveyards and mosques have been destroyed. I posted satellite pictures of the crimes. You ignored them. I also included examples of their attempts to blame Black people for coronavirus, and Black people being denied access to premises and accomodation solely due to the colour of their skin.
You are continuing to post propaganda for a vile, repressive, racist regime, one that is engaging in atrocious human rights abuses. While I hold such behaviour in contempt, I also recognise that these days especially it is possible to be radicalised by internet echo chambers. You should challenge your beliefs by examining in detail what China has done to the Uighurs. Until your views change, though, you are on the exact same moral level as a neofascist. That's not an enviable place to be.
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: Fascist China
Yeah, they're doing a bunch of good for the Uighurs.Herainestold wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 8:25 pmLucifer, do you think there are some situations where a leftist authoritarian government can do more to help the general population than a post-imperialist, cronyist, pseudo-democracy?
Something something hammer something something nail
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: Fascist China
It's an example of the debating strategy of saying X is very like Y, and we hate Y, so we should hate X. It's essentially a mixture of laziness in not just arguing directly about X and an element of name calling.individualmember wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 1:14 pmThis is tangential to the point of the thread, but I wonder if anyone else feels rather uncomfortable with the word fascist in Fascist China?
-
- Fuzzable
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:51 pm
Re: Fascist China
I always thought a crucial part of fascism was harking back to supposed glory days of the past, and an attempt to reclaim them by strict military like order reinforcing the fabric of society. I think China would not be fascist for that reason.
Looking at Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism I don’t see this though, so it may just be me.
Nonetheless I do know that fascism was a term developed for the “far right” derived totalitarian type governments or promoters and not far left derived ones. The similarities between far right and fat left has often been commented on but “fascism” is not a term used for both, while things like “totalitarian” have been. Technically far right and far left are just labels as well but the regimes proponents and regimes of these ideologies viewed themselves as fundamentally distinct and most people can see this.
With the market reforms China instituted, making it less and less communist, the lines may have been blurred, but it still seems a leap, because it is still an authoritarian state that came into being espousing a left wing ideology and despite what you say I think there are remnants of that in the way the Chinese state views itself, the way others view it and the way it runs. I think in general calling it fascist, when that word does not feel right to people, just makes you like biased and puts people off what you are trying to say.
Looking at Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism I don’t see this though, so it may just be me.
Nonetheless I do know that fascism was a term developed for the “far right” derived totalitarian type governments or promoters and not far left derived ones. The similarities between far right and fat left has often been commented on but “fascism” is not a term used for both, while things like “totalitarian” have been. Technically far right and far left are just labels as well but the regimes proponents and regimes of these ideologies viewed themselves as fundamentally distinct and most people can see this.
With the market reforms China instituted, making it less and less communist, the lines may have been blurred, but it still seems a leap, because it is still an authoritarian state that came into being espousing a left wing ideology and despite what you say I think there are remnants of that in the way the Chinese state views itself, the way others view it and the way it runs. I think in general calling it fascist, when that word does not feel right to people, just makes you like biased and puts people off what you are trying to say.
-
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Fascist China
Is this today's reading from the "big book of facts that prove our nation's enemies are evil"?
Re: Fascist China
Wot Bewildered said!
Also, even in the Wikipedia article on Fascism, it does mention that the tenets of Fascism are: i) the rebirth myth, ii) populist ultra-nationalism, and iii) the myth of decadence of liberal democracy. So there is a tendency for harking back to supposed glory days of the past, even if those days didn't really exist; it's not just you Bewildered!
Also, even in the Wikipedia article on Fascism, it does mention that the tenets of Fascism are: i) the rebirth myth, ii) populist ultra-nationalism, and iii) the myth of decadence of liberal democracy. So there is a tendency for harking back to supposed glory days of the past, even if those days didn't really exist; it's not just you Bewildered!
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
- individualmember
- Catbabel
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:26 pm
Re: Fascist China
Yeah, I think that’s what makes me uncomfortable. It’s been misused in that way so much that even when it actually is a fair description it seems off.Millennie Al wrote: ↑Sun May 24, 2020 2:24 amIt's an example of the debating strategy of saying X is very like Y, and we hate Y, so we should hate X. It's essentially a mixture of laziness in not just arguing directly about X and an element of name calling.individualmember wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 1:14 pmThis is tangential to the point of the thread, but I wonder if anyone else feels rather uncomfortable with the word fascist in Fascist China?
- individualmember
- Catbabel
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:26 pm
Re: Fascist China
Xi Jinping has been playing the revisionist with Chinese history though, for example hereBewildered wrote: ↑Sun May 24, 2020 3:07 amI always thought a crucial part of fascism was harking back to supposed glory days of the past, and an attempt to reclaim them by strict military like order reinforcing the fabric of society. I think China would not be fascist for that reason.
Looking at Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism I don’t see this though, so it may just be me.
Nonetheless I do know that fascism was a term developed for the “far right” derived totalitarian type governments or promoters and not far left derived ones. The similarities between far right and fat left has often been commented on but “fascism” is not a term used for both, while things like “totalitarian” have been. Technically far right and far left are just labels as well but the regimes proponents and regimes of these ideologies viewed themselves as fundamentally distinct and most people can see this.
With the market reforms China instituted, making it less and less communist, the lines may have been blurred, but it still seems a leap, because it is still an authoritarian state that came into being espousing a left wing ideology and despite what you say I think there are remnants of that in the way the Chinese state views itself, the way others view it and the way it runs. I think in general calling it fascist, when that word does not feel right to people, just makes you like biased and puts people off what you are trying to say.
For example (just a tiny sliver of the article)
In giving his first China Dream speech in the Road to Revival exhibit—standing before photographs of Deng Xiaoping and a placard that reads “Taking the Path of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics”—Xi Jinping suggested that the formulation of dreams in the present and their realization in the future are predicated on overcoming the past.
China’s revival can only occur once that past, especially the “century of humiliation” during which China was cajoled by Western and Japanese imperialists, has been fully and properly put behind it. It is the story of that past and the overcoming that is narrated in Road to Revival.
The view of modern Chinese history presented at the National Museum of China may be retrograde and propagandistic, but that doesn’t mean we should ignore or dismiss it.
That the history of imperialism is still viewed as a burden to China’s emergence on the world scene, for instance, helps explain China’s recent provocations over the Diaoyu Islands and the South China Sea with its Asian neighbors.
It also reflects a longstanding proclivity to use historical narratives as a tool for political legitimization that is as much a product of the Confucian tradition as it is of Marxism-Leninism.