Radio frequency facials

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
Grumble
Dorkwood
Posts: 1155
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Radio frequency facials

Post by Grumble » Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:44 pm

Not a euphemism. This was posted on my local Facebook group. It’s certainly a novel way of heating the face up. Not sure it would achieve anything sticking your face over a bowl of hot water wouldn’t.

At work we have big warning signs if we’re going to use RF. What’s next, nitric acid facial peel?
Attachments
4097F245-83BC-443B-B05F-A97E51E702CC.jpeg
4097F245-83BC-443B-B05F-A97E51E702CC.jpeg (692.29 KiB) Viewed 270 times
I know this is vitriol, no solution, spleen venting, but I feel better having screamed, don’t you?

User avatar
bob sterman
Fuzzable
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm

Re: Radio frequency facials

Post by bob sterman » Tue Oct 13, 2020 10:44 am

Wonder how much overlap there is between the people who are willing to pay for RF facials - and the people who believe RF "pollution" is messing with their brains???

(P.S. the RF stimulation seems to have shrunk her pupil. So it tightened one muscle at least!).

User avatar
Gfamily
After Pie
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm

Re: Radio frequency facials

Post by Gfamily » Tue Oct 13, 2020 11:08 am

bob sterman wrote:
Tue Oct 13, 2020 10:44 am
Wonder how much overlap there is between the people who are willing to pay for RF facials - and the people who believe RF "pollution" is messing with their brains???

(P.S. the RF stimulation seems to have shrunk her pupil. So it tightened one muscle at least!).
NB the change of lighting angle.

Though it is possible that it's actually the RF stimulation on the Full Moon that explains why craters are far less visible compared to first quarter. Yes, RF stimulation works on the Moon too! Hurrah!
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!

User avatar
FredM
Stargoon
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Re: Radio frequency facials

Post by FredM » Tue Oct 13, 2020 12:54 pm

There have been reports that this type cosmetic treatment can actually increase perceived skin age by causing subcutaneous fat loss, that’s in addition to the risk of burns.

User avatar
bob sterman
Fuzzable
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm

Re: Radio frequency facials

Post by bob sterman » Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:34 pm

FredM wrote:
Tue Oct 13, 2020 12:54 pm
There have been reports that this type cosmetic treatment can actually increase perceived skin age by causing subcutaneous fat loss, that’s in addition to the risk of burns.
Well with high frequency RF I have successfully managed to brown some skin in my kitchen - although not as effectively as when it's placed in a conventional oven

User avatar
Martin_B
Snowbonk
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:20 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Radio frequency facials

Post by Martin_B » Tue Oct 13, 2020 11:51 pm

I think they're underselling this RF treatment. I mean, after 1 treatment it's managed to turn grey hair back to brown!
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"

User avatar
RoMo
Bank Butt
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:57 pm

Re: Radio frequency facials

Post by RoMo » Wed Oct 14, 2020 5:29 am

And if you thought using RF for a facial was weird...

https://www.plasticsurgery.org/cosmetic ... treatments

Post Reply