Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
- tenchboy
- After Pie
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:18 pm
- Location: Down amongst the potamogeton.
Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Alledgedly I mean I suppose it is actually possible that they did apply for a Waste Regs Disposal License beforehand.
Isn't it?
Isn't it?
If you want me Steve, just Snapchat me yeah? You know how to Snapchap me doncha Steve? You just...
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
How the f.ck are they "marine protected areas" if bottom trawling is allowed?!
it's okay to say "I don't know"
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
"Paper parks" aren't a phenomenon restricted to poor countries, unfortunately. The UK is just as guilty of pretending places are designated for conservation when they're actually not. See also the joke of a national park system.
I'd ban bottom trawling outright, if I were king of the sea.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Me too, along with flags of convenience.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 4:40 pmI'd ban bottom trawling outright, if I were king of the sea.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Yeah, that's a good one. If I don't make it as king I'm happy for you to take my place
The general dumping of nets, rubbish and sewage by ships can go too. Oh and quotas are to be actually based on science, and enforced by sharks.
The general dumping of nets, rubbish and sewage by ships can go too. Oh and quotas are to be actually based on science, and enforced by sharks.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
I like your manifesto! And I'm happy to act as substitute should the need arise.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 5:20 pmYeah, that's a good one. If I don't make it as king I'm happy for you to take my place
The general dumping of nets, rubbish and sewage by ships can go too. Oh and quotas are to be actually based on science, and enforced by sharks.
I'd add biodegradable nets for when they are dumped as dumping isn't always intentional. One boat I was on had to cut its net as it was very badly snagged and even after trying for several hours they couldn't get it free. Of course, that was with bottom trawling, which we've already banned, so it should be a moot point as pelagic nets rarely get caught on anything.
Oh, and no more discards.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
These boulders are going to cause more dumping of nets. Fishermen don’t dump them for fun, they’re expensive.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
I think the idea is to force them to avoid fishing in the area.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Realistically how many fishing boats are going to know that when they next plan to fish the area? In the long term, sure, but short term there’s going to be snagged nets.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
They publically disclose the location of each drop.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
The location and purpose of Marine Protected Areas is quite well publicised as well.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Apparently MPAs have never stopped any actual fishing before though. I’d love them to, and I support the aims of Greenpeace in this, I just hope this action doesn’t result in more abandoned nets in the sea.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 7:47 pmThe location and purpose of Marine Protected Areas is quite well publicised as well.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
I suspect the Greenpeace action is also designed to highlight this fact. When you call an area "protected" most people will assume that affords it some sort of protection.Grumble wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:01 pmApparently MPAs have never stopped any actual fishing before though. I’d love them to, and I support the aims of Greenpeace in this, I just hope this action doesn’t result in more abandoned nets in the sea.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 7:47 pmThe location and purpose of Marine Protected Areas is quite well publicised as well.
I've done a bit of googling to try and find out what the UK means by a Marine Protected Area and while many organisations are very positive about our "network of MPAs' they are incredibly vague about what they actually are. It's almost as if no-one really wants to admit they're little more than a PR exercise.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Fair enough - me too. Hopefully the risk of getting tangled is enough to deter fishers from going there, and I'd have no sympathy for any that lose expensive equipment. Of course, when they do have to cut nets loose they should also bring them on board and back to sure for safe disposal rather than dumping them at sea, but I'd need someone more experienced to say whether that's actually possible.Grumble wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:01 pmApparently MPAs have never stopped any actual fishing before though. I’d love them to, and I support the aims of Greenpeace in this, I just hope this action doesn’t result in more abandoned nets in the sea.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 7:47 pmThe location and purpose of Marine Protected Areas is quite well publicised as well.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Nice to see they've learnt something from the Brent Spar debacle!
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
- Matatouille
- Fuzzable
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:26 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
I think these boulders are likely to create the sorts of cut net scenarios that Fishnut described, where the fishers are simply unable to un-snag their net and bring it aboard. The question is whether overall this is less damage because the presence of the boulders dissuades fishers from deploying this type of equipment there. I don't know how frequently nets get damaged beyond economic repair and just dumped overboard though, rather than pay for some form of proper disposal ashore. That would obviously be indefensible and something to be stopped though. Hopefully initiatives/products like this create a residual value to badly damaged equipment and remove that perverse incentive.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:21 pmFair enough - me too. Hopefully the risk of getting tangled is enough to deter fishers from going there, and I'd have no sympathy for any that lose expensive equipment. Of course, when they do have to cut nets loose they should also bring them on board and back to sure for safe disposal rather than dumping them at sea, but I'd need someone more experienced to say whether that's actually possible.
With bottom trawling, is the intention of the bar scraping the bottom to stir up fish that were on the bottom to get them into the net, or just keep the net in proximity to the bottom to get the fish that occupy that lowest few meters of the water column and scraping the bottom is just an accepted consequence of the method? Could a technological solution that controls the net to glide at a small distance above the seabed mitigate much of the damage*.
*Obviously not the damage inherent in the colossal overfishing we're typically doing, but the physical damage that further hampers the ecosystem bouncing back.
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4109
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
I think this action, like a lot of things of this nature (which often tend to be climate/ecosystem related these days) are basically a real life example of the trolley problem, except people are gonna spend ages arguing over how many people are tied down to which track.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: More Unlicensed Fly Tipping
I moved this topic to Weighty Matters as it contains an erudite discussion on marine environment policy[mod/].
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
The idea with bottom trawling is deliberately disturbing the seabed, so the noise and turbidity disturbs and confuses fish. The main targets are bottom-dwelling flatfish like sole, flounder, halibut, plus things like rays. They also smash up coral, catch turtles and generally f.ck things up long-term.Matatouille wrote: ↑Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:50 amWith bottom trawling, is the intention of the bar scraping the bottom to stir up fish that were on the bottom to get them into the net, or just keep the net in proximity to the bottom to get the fish that occupy that lowest few meters of the water column and scraping the bottom is just an accepted consequence of the method? Could a technological solution that controls the net to glide at a small distance above the seabed mitigate much of the damage*.
*Obviously not the damage inherent in the colossal overfishing we're typically doing, but the physical damage that further hampers the ecosystem bouncing back.
There was a decent article in Geophysical Research Letters last year whose intro goes into the long-term impacts. Their findings suggest that the seabed takes ages to recover, which isn't new info, but I think the finding about impeding carbon sequestration specifically is.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Heavy trawls just scrape up everything including habitats etc. They leave a blank stripe. The closest analogy to farming is when they grow turf and peel off the top layer of soil when they harvest it.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
For sure. A closer analogy I guess would be bulldozing an area of scrub or heathland or whatever to catch some pheasants.
It's totally f.cked that it's allowed inside protected areas.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Have you read "an unnatural history of the sea"?
Lots of things about fishing are f.cked up
Lots of things about fishing are f.cked up
- Matatouille
- Fuzzable
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:26 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Bottom trawling in Marine Protected Areas
Goody, so a tech solution to address the physical damage would be fixing a problem that the fishers don't want solved. I guess I'll just continue to not eat flatfish then.