The Death Of Fossil Fuels
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
When I bought a printer last year, all the manufacturers were pushing actual subscriptions - you pay say €3 a month, they let you print up to 50 pages, and send you a new cartridge when it runs out. If you miss a payment, or don't connect to wifi for a few weeks, they remotely deactivate your printer.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
I can imagine a model where you pay for a battery warranty on top of the cost of the battery, with extra costs if you let the battery level drop below a certain level more than n times a month.
But yeah, rent seeking is the business model of everything now, from groceries with "autoship" and meal kit subscriptions to printers and cars.
But yeah, rent seeking is the business model of everything now, from groceries with "autoship" and meal kit subscriptions to printers and cars.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Fair enough I think our department printers might work on that sort of model.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:51 pmWhen I bought a printer last year, all the manufacturers were pushing actual subscriptions - you pay say €3 a month, they let you print up to 50 pages, and send you a new cartridge when it runs out. If you miss a payment, or don't connect to wifi for a few weeks, they remotely deactivate your printer.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Presumably those companies selling that service to businesses have done really well over the past year, while the home ones have been hit with everyone running up to the limits.shpalman wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:57 pmFair enough I think our department printers might work on that sort of model.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:51 pmWhen I bought a printer last year, all the manufacturers were pushing actual subscriptions - you pay say €3 a month, they let you print up to 50 pages, and send you a new cartridge when it runs out. If you miss a payment, or don't connect to wifi for a few weeks, they remotely deactivate your printer.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
I know it was the case with the Renault Zoe. Early ones you had a separate lease for the battery, then the model before mine you could choose whether to lease it separately (in which case the upfront cost of the car was reduced) or have it included. When I got mine it wasn't even an option. It appears that current usage is that people change cars before the battery is even remotely an issue so car companies gave up. However it may become an issue with older second-hand cars, but there the second-hand market is comparatively young so things haven't developed.Grumble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:13 pmSome started like that. The original Leaf you had a separate contract for the battery I think, but all that has stopped now it’s become apparent how well the batteries last.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:10 pmTo be honest I'm half expecting batteries to be a subscription service, like they're doing with ink cartridges and stuff. More money = more range. Miss a monthly payment and you can't drive. Seems to be the direction capitalism is going: sell you something then make you rent it too.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
I think the Nissan Leaf's battery's lack of thermal management and consequent degradation problems put the wind up the rest of the industry so they did all sorts of gymnastics in an attempt to assuage potential buyers about battery concerns.
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
That quote is ambiguous. It could mean either that "charged and discharged 100% every cycle" is like an EV or the exact opposite. Since you said "Jeff Dahn is a battery researcher who works closely with Tesla." I took this to mean advocating keeping EV battery charge within 25% to 75%. Maybe you meant something else.bjn wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:31 amThere is a reason I have you on ignore. Every time I make the mistake of looking at one of your posts it’s full of derp. In this particular case, if you look at the text in the image I posted,Millennie Al wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:16 amThat's all very well, but it means halving your range, so a theoretical 250 mile range becomes 125 miles.
“Lithium-ion batteries do better under conditions where they are not charged and discharged 100% every cycle - like an EV.”
No. It doesn't. When I refuel a petrol or diesel vehicle, I pretty much always fill the tank, and I would expect the same of an EV plugged in at home overnight. I'd also refuel based on range remaining - why make unnecessary stops? So if the range is 500 miles, I'd rarely refuel before 20%, and often wait to 10% (i.e. 50 miles remaining as I know it's easy to choose a filling station within that distance).It fits in with typical usage patterns of an EV, you have the range if you need it, but most of the time you don’t drive from 100% down to 0%.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Ignoring your derp from now on Al. Sorry (not sorry) chum.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
If you have an EV, assuming you have ready access to charging where you regularly park it, it doesn’t seem too hard to get used to plugging it in each time you park there rather than waiting until your battery is nearly empty - and we know that most people's daily distance driven is a small fraction of today’s EV ranges. Again I think this points to infrastructure being a bigger real barrier to EV uptake than range or battery durability. Perceived barriers, on the other hand…
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Infrastructure is a real pain no doubt. Here’s a blogpost from the head of the EVA about driving a long way in her ev. Really hope this gets sorted soon. Ecotricity seem to come in for a fair amount of stick when these things are discussed on Twitter, and they have service stations sewn up.
https://fullycharged.show/blog/surveyin ... in-the-uk/
https://fullycharged.show/blog/surveyin ... in-the-uk/
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Meanwhile, here’s a thing about cold weather and wind turbines.
Move-a… side, and let the mango through… let the mango through
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Cancel all coal projects, says UN Secretary General. https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... s-un-chief
I'm sure we all look forward to the UK regaining its world-leading stance on fighting climate change imminently.
I'm sure we all look forward to the UK regaining its world-leading stance on fighting climate change imminently.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Maggie was ahead of her time, trying to eliminate the UK coal industry.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:43 amCancel all coal projects, says UN Secretary General. https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... s-un-chief
I'm sure we all look forward to the UK regaining its world-leading stance on fighting climate change imminently.
(Well, she was a believer in climate change and proponent of the UK being a technology leader in reducing CO2 emissions.)
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Credit where it’s due, Maggie was very pro-science.Martin_B wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:28 amMaggie was ahead of her time, trying to eliminate the UK coal industry.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:43 amCancel all coal projects, says UN Secretary General. https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... s-un-chief
I'm sure we all look forward to the UK regaining its world-leading stance on fighting climate change imminently.
(Well, she was a believer in climate change and proponent of the UK being a technology leader in reducing CO2 emissions.)
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Transition innit, it will be painful now and then. It would be nice of the UK had something like Biden's push for a unified wide scale charging infrastructure.Grumble wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:10 pmInfrastructure is a real pain no doubt. Here’s a blogpost from the head of the EVA about driving a long way in her ev. Really hope this gets sorted soon. Ecotricity seem to come in for a fair amount of stick when these things are discussed on Twitter, and they have service stations sewn up.
https://fullycharged.show/blog/surveyin ... in-the-uk/
It's not as if you don't get similar problems with fossil fuels, I once had to push a motorcycle several miles because a service station I expected to be open wasn't.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
It'll be a nice project for the Green Investment Bank the UK's getting.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
I just noticed that Google Maps has a little petrol pump icon which offers to show gas stations along your route. I picked my yearly trip from home to Snowdonia and it pinned well over a dozen places along the 200 mile route. Nice. But they all literally sell gas. Not petrol. Not gasoline. Gas. Like bottled propane gas. Thanks Google.
(This was in the context of looking to see if it would show EV charging points, but it seems it hasn't quite caught up with petrol yet so give it time, I guess.)
(This was in the context of looking to see if it would show EV charging points, but it seems it hasn't quite caught up with petrol yet so give it time, I guess.)
-
- Clardic Fug
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:00 pm
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
https://www.zap-map.com/live/ is a good interactive map and route planner showing UK charging options.
-
- Clardic Fug
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 5:00 pm
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
A slightly less pessimistic view in this IET talk.jimbob wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 10:26 pmLikewise.shpalman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 12:03 pmIf I say that we'll have zero emission aviation before we have working fusion power, it's not because I think we'll have zero emission aviation soon, but because I think we'll never have working fusion power.MartinDurkin wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 11:45 amCouple more links.
https://www.zeroavia.com/
https://www.greencarcongress.com/2021/0 ... ebear.html
So does the hive mind think zero emission aviation is a realistic goal in the short/medium term (let's say before we have working fusion power).
It's not a good model to follow. Unless we are talking about science fiction scenarios
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pd8kQRfydU
Main speaker begins about 7 minutes in.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
We're getting a new semi-commercial fusion experimental reactor near here soon.
https://www.wbur.org/earthwhile/2021/03 ... ion-devens
https://www.wbur.org/earthwhile/2021/03 ... ion-devens
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Interesting paper on the mispricing of legacy generation assets.
Valuing a generation asset relies heavily on the LCOE, while the LCOE is heavily influenced by the capacity factor, in their definition, this is the proportion of generation capacity you can produce and actually sell. The problem they point out is that the capacity factors built into standard valuations are rubbish. For example, standard LCOE calculations for coal burners assume a capacity factor of 85%, while real world capacity factors for coal in the US is 47%, in the U.K. it’s 8%. This grossly overprices a whole range of assets.
Capacity factors for a range of technologies are in decline because of increased competition from Solar, Wind and Batteries. Market prices for power are typically dictated by the marginal cost of available generation. Marginal cost of generation for SWB is pretty close to zero. The inevitable consequence of that is the wide scale deployment of ever cheaper SWB will squeeze out other forms of generation, decreasing their capacity factors, and so raising their LCOE, and so dropping the price of the generation assets in a question.
In short, coal is already f.cked, based on real world cap factors it’s 2020 LCOE should be 4x the one given by the EIA. Capacity factors will be dynamic as more SWB come on stream, gas will be squeeze in the next decade, same with Nukes. Hydro has low marginal costs of production, so existing hydro will do fine, but no one will be building swathes of new ones because the LCOE at the reduced capacity factors don’t make sense.
Their supposition is that this has caused a huge financial bubble based around mispricing of legacy generation technologies and their supply chains, and that is a source of economic instability as bad as subprime lending was.
Valuing a generation asset relies heavily on the LCOE, while the LCOE is heavily influenced by the capacity factor, in their definition, this is the proportion of generation capacity you can produce and actually sell. The problem they point out is that the capacity factors built into standard valuations are rubbish. For example, standard LCOE calculations for coal burners assume a capacity factor of 85%, while real world capacity factors for coal in the US is 47%, in the U.K. it’s 8%. This grossly overprices a whole range of assets.
Capacity factors for a range of technologies are in decline because of increased competition from Solar, Wind and Batteries. Market prices for power are typically dictated by the marginal cost of available generation. Marginal cost of generation for SWB is pretty close to zero. The inevitable consequence of that is the wide scale deployment of ever cheaper SWB will squeeze out other forms of generation, decreasing their capacity factors, and so raising their LCOE, and so dropping the price of the generation assets in a question.
In short, coal is already f.cked, based on real world cap factors it’s 2020 LCOE should be 4x the one given by the EIA. Capacity factors will be dynamic as more SWB come on stream, gas will be squeeze in the next decade, same with Nukes. Hydro has low marginal costs of production, so existing hydro will do fine, but no one will be building swathes of new ones because the LCOE at the reduced capacity factors don’t make sense.
Their supposition is that this has caused a huge financial bubble based around mispricing of legacy generation technologies and their supply chains, and that is a source of economic instability as bad as subprime lending was.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
An interesting alternative use of food waste - rather than using a bio-digester to make methane gas, using food waste to make a liquid fuel for use in aircraft.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-56408603
The claimed percentage reduction in CO2 is probably spurious, and I would say, doesn't really strengthen the case for it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-56408603
The claimed percentage reduction in CO2 is probably spurious, and I would say, doesn't really strengthen the case for it.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Yes, that reduction would be interesting to prove!Gfamily wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:09 pmAn interesting alternative use of food waste - rather than using a bio-digester to make methane gas, using food waste to make a liquid fuel for use in aircraft.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-56408603
The claimed percentage reduction in CO2 is probably spurious, and I would say, doesn't really strengthen the case for it.
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
The paper's here: clicky, but you have to go to the supplementary stuff to see some detail on how they got to 165% which is here: clickyGfamily wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:09 pmAn interesting alternative use of food waste - rather than using a bio-digester to make methane gas, using food waste to make a liquid fuel for use in aircraft.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-56408603
The claimed percentage reduction in CO2 is probably spurious, and I would say, doesn't really strengthen the case for it.
Only scanned it, but it seems they get the big reduction in emissions because they are using CO2 equivalents (1 methane = 25 carbons, IRC). By avoiding the methane emission by letting food rot in a landfill, and burning to get CO2 instead, they claim to cause a reduction in emissions larger than flying causes.
But they subtracted the landfill emissions from the new fuel emissions, which makes it seem like you are actually taking CHGs out of the system, which seems wrong. You are still burning stuff when you fly.
If I was doing it I would have added the emissions from landfill to the flying emissions as the reference and compared the emissions from producing and burning this new fuel. This gives you 45% of the total emissions you had before.
Re: The Death Of Fossil Fuels
Including while lifecycle costs would be interesting. The food waste had to be made into food in the first place.
Yes it’s going to landfill/compost at the moment, but ideally it should be being eaten.
Yes it’s going to landfill/compost at the moment, but ideally it should be being eaten.