It's intersting that there have been parties in Government which don't recognise the Palestinians right to land, because the bible say it all belongs to the Jews. Yet apparently you can't talk to anyone who denys Israel's right to exist?
Israel and Palestine
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Israel and Palestine
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Israel and Palestine
That's good to see. Thanks.bolo wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 2:36 pmNot necessarily disagreeing with your general points, but FWIW, Biden spoke with Abbas by phone on Saturday:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-roo ... oud-abbas/
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Israel and Palestine
Verso Books have made the book Ten Myths about Israel by Ilan Pappe free to download.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: Israel and Palestine
Something that surprised me was the discovery that one or two of the ultra-ultra-ultra orthodox, "Don't walk on the cracks in the pavement on a Saturday" parties are not nearly as right-wing and anti-Palestinian/Muslim as I would have expected from my rather naive interpretation of fundamentalism.IvanV wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:48 pmThe majority of Israeli Jews are secular/non-observant, etc. The rest display a bewildering variety of denominations, for such a small religion. Although the ultra-orthodox are quite a small proportion, they tend to have 19th century quantities of children. So their proportion has increased, and the religious vote along with it. Also the Arab Israels have managed to get the vote out and play the system to increase their vote share. So the arithmetic has tended to work against the more moderate parties. To date no one has done a deal with the Arab parties, though the left were flirting with it recently.
Something something hammer something something nail
Re: Israel and Palestine
I suspect they don't find their identity threatened by Muslims in particular, so much as by more slightly liberal observant Jews. When you start from that far in one direction, everyone looks far away.sTeamTraen wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 8:24 pmSomething that surprised me was the discovery that one or two of the ultra-ultra-ultra orthodox, "Don't walk on the cracks in the pavement on a Saturday" parties are not nearly as right-wing and anti-Palestinian/Muslim as I would have expected from my rather naive interpretation of fundamentalism.IvanV wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:48 pmThe majority of Israeli Jews are secular/non-observant, etc. The rest display a bewildering variety of denominations, for such a small religion. Although the ultra-orthodox are quite a small proportion, they tend to have 19th century quantities of children. So their proportion has increased, and the religious vote along with it. Also the Arab Israels have managed to get the vote out and play the system to increase their vote share. So the arithmetic has tended to work against the more moderate parties. To date no one has done a deal with the Arab parties, though the left were flirting with it recently.
Re: Israel and Palestine
Many of the Orthodox sects are Antizionist. Well, Anti-Secular-Zionist anyway, and to varying degrees. They think that only the Messiah can bring about the state of Israel, so are against it. Some are so against it that they do not recognise it as a state, despite living there (but also unlikely to join a political party). They have followers/members outside of Israel too, including the UK and USA, but are very much in the minority.sTeamTraen wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 8:24 pmSomething that surprised me was the discovery that one or two of the ultra-ultra-ultra orthodox, "Don't walk on the cracks in the pavement on a Saturday" parties are not nearly as right-wing and anti-Palestinian/Muslim as I would have expected from my rather naive interpretation of fundamentalism.IvanV wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:48 pmThe majority of Israeli Jews are secular/non-observant, etc. The rest display a bewildering variety of denominations, for such a small religion. Although the ultra-orthodox are quite a small proportion, they tend to have 19th century quantities of children. So their proportion has increased, and the religious vote along with it. Also the Arab Israels have managed to get the vote out and play the system to increase their vote share. So the arithmetic has tended to work against the more moderate parties. To date no one has done a deal with the Arab parties, though the left were flirting with it recently.
I forget the name of the sect that the crank left wing always use as an example of "not all Jews are Zionists".
- sTeamTraen
- After Pie
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Re: Israel and Palestine
I remember reading about one group who wouldn't fly with El Al because they allowed men and women to sit in the same row, even with an aisle between them. Some of the orthodox people make the Taliban look like the "J C Flannel" end of the Church of England.dyqik wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 10:44 pmI suspect they don't find their identity threatened by Muslims in particular, so much as by more slightly liberal observant Jews. When you start from that far in one direction, everyone looks far away.sTeamTraen wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 8:24 pmSomething that surprised me was the discovery that one or two of the ultra-ultra-ultra orthodox, "Don't walk on the cracks in the pavement on a Saturday" parties are not nearly as right-wing and anti-Palestinian/Muslim as I would have expected from my rather naive interpretation of fundamentalism.
Something something hammer something something nail
Re: Israel and Palestine
Probably because the Tanakh says it, rather than the BibleTrinucleus wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 4:14 pmIt's intersting that there have been parties in Government which don't recognise the Palestinians right to land, because the bible say it all belongs to the Jews. Yet apparently you can't talk to anyone who denys Israel's right to exist?
"My interest is in the future, because I'm going to spend the rest of my life there"
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Israel and Palestine
Well, after blocking everyone else's attempts to pressure Israel, the US has at least announced it's going to help rebuild in Gaza:
Israel being oh-so-generous:
Mr Blinken said intense, behind-the-scenes diplomacy by US President Joe Biden had helped produce last week's ceasefire, and that "now we believe we must build on it".
He added: "We know that to prevent a return to violence we have to use the space created to address a larger set of underlying issues and challenges. And that begins with tackling the grave humanitarian situation in Gaza and starting to rebuild."
He said the US would rally international support around that effort while also making its own "significant contributions", including some that would be announced later on Tuesday.
Israel being oh-so-generous:
c.nts.Israeli authorities said earlier that they were allowing fuel, medicine and food for Gaza's private sector to enter the territory for the first time since the fighting ended.
Of course, Israel reckons they killed "over 200 militants".The UN said on Sunday that 242 Palestinians, including 66 children and 38 women, were killed in the conflict, and that its human right's office had verified that at least 129 of them were civilians.
Of course, Israel reckons those were militant hospitals, militant schools and militant water facilitiesThe UN cited the Palestinian housing ministry as saying 258 buildings, comprising 1,042 housing and commercial units, were destroyed during the fighting. In addition, 769 housing units were severely damaged and 14,536 suffered minor damage.
Fifty-four education facilities, six hospitals and 11 primary healthcare facilities were also damaged, as was water, sanitation, and electric infrastructure, according to the UN.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Israel and Palestine
The UN Human Rights Council has voted to investigate violence in the recent conflict between Israel and Hamas.
The US is criticising the idea, of course. Apparently accountability will be bad for the peace process.The text of the resolution, brought by the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) and the Palestinian delegation, calls for a permanent Commission of Inquiry to be set up to report on rights violations in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza.
It also calls for the investigation of "all underlying root causes of recurrent tensions, instability and protraction of conflict".
Opening the council session, UN human rights chief Michele Bachelet said she was concerned about the high level of casualties in Gaza and warned that Israeli strikes might constitute war crimes.
She also described Hamas rocket fire at Israel as indiscriminate and a "clear violation" of international humanitarian law.
Nine members, including several Western countries, voted against the resolution and another 14 abstained. China and Russia were among those voting in favour.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Israel and Palestine
Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 9:00 pm
Nine members, including several Western countries, voted against the resolution and another 14 abstained. China and Russia were among those voting in favour.
Any guesses which way the UK voted?
Any theories about why the BBC may have thought that unworthy of mentioning or even worth mentioning we even had a vote in the first place?
I mean who wants to get bogged down in mere trivial details like that?
I think regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the vote the BBC has a clear duty to at least inform us which way our government responded or that our government even responded at all, its failure to do so seems a clear and conscious omission.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: Israel and Palestine
Has anyone found a list of which countries voted which way? From that article, 24 voted yes, including Russia and China; 9 voted no, including the UK, Austria, and Germany; and 14 abstained (the wimps), including France and the Netherlands. The US made a bunch of noise but is not a member.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7144
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Israel and Palestine
Some information on the vote may be posted here: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/S ... ssion.aspxLittle waster wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 9:35 pmBird on a Fire wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 9:00 pm
Nine members, including several Western countries, voted against the resolution and another 14 abstained. China and Russia were among those voting in favour.
Any guesses which way the UK voted?
Any theories about why the BBC may have thought that unworthy of mentioning or even worth mentioning we even had a vote in the first place?
I mean who wants to get bogged down in mere trivial details like that?
I think regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the vote the BBC has a clear duty to at least inform us which way our government responded or that our government even responded at all, its failure to do so seems a clear and conscious omission.
Important to note though that the Human Rights Council has many members which are governments which violate human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/P ... Group.aspx
It isn’t a credible body to conduct an investigation.
Re: Israel and Palestine
I looked there, but no luck finding the actual vote. Later maybe.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 10:12 pmSome information on the vote may be posted here: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/S ... ssion.aspx
Regrettable, but true.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 10:12 pmImportant to note though that the Human Rights Council has many members which are governments which violate human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/P ... Group.aspx
It isn’t a credible body to conduct an investigation.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Israel and Palestine
I found a full list on the french sitebolo wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 9:57 pmHas anyone found a list of which countries voted which way? From that article, 24 voted yes, including Russia and China; 9 voted no, including the UK, Austria, and Germany; and 14 abstained (the wimps), including France and the Netherlands. The US made a bunch of noise but is not a member.
https://www.ungeneva.org/fr/news-media/ ... commission
Interestingly it contradicts the Reuters version with votes against and votes abstaining being flippedIn favour (24): Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, China, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Eritrea, Gabon, Indonesia, Libya, Mauritania, Mexico, Namibia, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, Senegal, Somalia, Sudan, Uzbekistan and Venezuela.
Against (14): Bahamas, Brazil, Denmark, Fiji, France, India, Italy, Japan, Nepal, Netherlands, Poland, Republic of Korea, Togo and Ukraine.
Abstentions (9): Austria, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Czech Republic, Germany, Malawi, Marshall Islands, United Kingdom and Uruguay.
ETA: The BBC appear to have went with the Reuters version.
Go figure.The body approved the resolution, brought by a group of Islamic countries, by 24 votes to nine.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: Israel and Palestine
It's looking like Netanyahu is out soon, ousted by a rainbow coalition government.
Israeli opposition parties reach agreement to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
By Shira Rubin
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/mi ... story.html
Israeli opposition parties reach agreement to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
By Shira Rubin
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/mi ... story.html
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Israel and Palestine
I'm not sure it's really a rainbow coalition. There's no progressive or Palestinian parties in the government, just a February shacking up with the far right (and giving them the reigns in the first two years).
It's hard to be optimistic about progress if the PM is a far-right settler himself.
It's hard to be optimistic about progress if the PM is a far-right settler himself.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Israel and Palestine
What's a "February"?Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Sun May 30, 2021 10:27 pmI'm not sure it's really a rainbow coalition. There's no progressive or Palestinian parties in the government, just a February shacking up with the far right (and giving them the reigns in the first two years).
It's hard to be optimistic about progress if the PM is a far-right settler himself.
The centrist and secular Yesh Atid party led by Yair Lapid, which is the largest party in this potential coalition, does not seem to have a progressive view on peace. The first 7 of its 8 main policies listed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yesh_Atid#Platform, are domestic issues. The last one, and thus presumably of least importance, is:
"Striving for peace according to an outline of "two states for two peoples", while maintaining the large Israeli settlement blocs and ensuring the safety of Israel." A subsidiary policy is "Renewing peace negotiations with the Palestinians and halting construction in Israeli settlements"
This sounds like the less strident position the Israeli goverment had before Ariel Sharon. But ultimately amounts to sit on what they've got, give nothing away, while paying lip-service to a two-state solution, but keep the provocations down. And, as you correctly note, they are talking about letting Naftali Bennett have first turn at being PM. His New Right party is opposed both to a Palestinian state and to inclusiveness within one state.
I suspect their main priority is getting Netanyahu in court and out of contention, and then they'll have another election.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Israel and Palestine
Ooops. Yeah "February" was an auto-corrupt for "centrist".
It's like if the Lib Dems teamed up with the BNP to get Johnson out of office. If they all agreed on continuing a genocide.
Why do you think they'd go for another election, out of interest?
It's like if the Lib Dems teamed up with the BNP to get Johnson out of office. If they all agreed on continuing a genocide.
Why do you think they'd go for another election, out of interest?
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Israel and Palestine
There would be another election because they hate each other. But for now both think they can gain from taking down Bibi (and his network)
Re: Israel and Palestine
This is a world champion autocorrupt.
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Israel and Palestine
Interestingly I can replicate it. Possibly of relevance is that I swipe rather than type. I should probably still proofread though
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8317
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Israel and Palestine
UK education row as Israel-Palestine textbooks pulled
... the only exam board to offer curriculum material and a GCSE history option on the region has withdrawn its two textbooks after being accused of favouring the case for Israel.
It is the second time that the history books... have been taken off the shelves. The first time – in October 2019 – was because Jewish organisations claimed the books favoured Palestine.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Israel and Palestine
Wouldn't the obvious thing to do be to put both books back on the shelves, and let the teachers/pupils develop a balanced(?) view that way?shpalman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 8:25 amUK education row as Israel-Palestine textbooks pulled
... the only exam board to offer curriculum material and a GCSE history option on the region has withdrawn its two textbooks after being accused of favouring the case for Israel.It is the second time that the history books... have been taken off the shelves. The first time – in October 2019 – was because Jewish organisations claimed the books favoured Palestine.
Or am I being naive?
Some people call me strange.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
I prefer unconventional.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept eccentric.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8317
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Israel and Palestine
I'd say to write a book which pisses both sides off equally.
And to include the fact that they're pissed off in the book.
And to include the fact that they're pissed off in the book.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk