Australia is on fire
Australia is on fire
Bush fire season is in full swing and it's only November. Yet the Deputy Prime Minister thinks that discussing climate change right now is a "disgrace" and are just "the ravings of some pure, enlightened and woke capital city greenies.”
How many millions of hectares have to burn, how many homes destroyed, how many lives lost, before the Australian government admits that climate change is real and the country is facing catastrophe if it doesn't act?
How many millions of hectares have to burn, how many homes destroyed, how many lives lost, before the Australian government admits that climate change is real and the country is facing catastrophe if it doesn't act?
it's okay to say "I don't know"
Re: Australia is on fire
They don’t care and some actually believe what they are saying. A chap I went to school with is now a conservative lobbyist in Queensland, so I get a glimpse into that world. There’s genuine belief that the science is all made up pinko nonsense. They are far scarier than the pure political players.
- rockdoctor
- Clardic Fug
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:52 am
- Location: Paddington, London
Re: Australia is on fire
I'm impressed that Australia has come up with yet another way to kill people
Re: Australia is on fire
Well they seem to have even managed volcanic eruptions within the time of oral history.rockdoctor wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:26 pmI'm impressed that Australia has come up with yet another way to kill people
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- basementer
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: 8024, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: Australia is on fire
Morning news on Radio NZ:
"The fire risk rating for Sydney will drop three ranks today, to Very High."
"The fire risk rating for Sydney will drop three ranks today, to Very High."
Money is just a substitute for luck anyway. - Tom Siddell
Re: Australia is on fire
Yes the ratings are a bit like that:basementer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:04 pmMorning news on Radio NZ:
"The fire risk rating for Sydney will drop three ranks today, to Very High."
https://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/plan-and-pre ... er-ratings
FIRE DANGER RATING WHAT YOU SHOULD DO
CATASTROPHIC
For your survival, leaving early is the only option.
Leave bush fire prone areas the night before or early in the day – do not just wait and see what happens.
Make a decision about when you will leave, where you will go, how you will get there and when you will return.
Homes are not designed to withstand fires in catastrophic conditions so you should leave early.
EXTREME
Leaving early is the safest option for your survival.
If you are not prepared to the highest level, leave early in the day.
Only consider staying if you are prepared to the highest level – such as your home is specially designed, constructed or modified, and situated to withstand a fire, you are well prepared and can actively defend it if a fire starts.
SEVERE
Leaving early is the safest option for your survival.
Well prepared homes that are actively defended can provide safety – but only stay if you are physically and mentally prepared to defend in these conditions.
If you're not prepared, leave early in the day.
VERY HIGH
HIGH
LOW MODERATE
Review your bush fire survival plan with your family. Keep yourself informed and monitor conditions. Be ready to act if necessary.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
-
- Clardic Fug
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:51 pm
Re: Australia is on fire
There are really only two ranks:
Actually On Fire.
About To Be Actually On Fire.
Actually On Fire.
About To Be Actually On Fire.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Australia is on fire
In Australia even the birds kill with fire.rockdoctor wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:26 pmI'm impressed that Australia has come up with yet another way to kill people
(See also video on facebook)
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Australia is on fire
I guess the question then is how do we counter this? I was listening to a podcast that explained that the reason climate change has become so politicised is that a lot of the solutions require government intervention and global responses which goes very much against the small government ethos of the right. It's therefore seen as a left-wing plot to expand government. Are there any ways to address those fears? Are there ways of talking about climate change in a way that deniers would listen to?bjn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:49 pmThey don’t care and some actually believe what they are saying. A chap I went to school with is now a conservative lobbyist in Queensland, so I get a glimpse into that world. There’s genuine belief that the science is all made up pinko nonsense. They are far scarier than the pure political players.
it's okay to say "I don't know"
Re: Australia is on fire
California has been burning too this autumn.
Ought that to have its own thread?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Ca ... _wildfires
Ought that to have its own thread?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Ca ... _wildfires
Re: Australia is on fire
Possibly - especially with his attitude to providing help to Russia but not Californiabmforre wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:46 pmCalifornia has been burning too this autumn.
Ought that to have its own thread?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Ca ... _wildfires
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump ... alifornia/
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
Re: Australia is on fire
The right doesn’t mind government intervention, so long as it’s the right kind of government intervention (the Adani mine is going to get hundreds of millions in subsidies). The main problem is that several very large very rich industries have everything to lose should proper action be taken. They’ve fought change tooth and nail and painted the regulation needed as pinko commie b.llsh.t. The stupider elements believe that, the smarter ones now think climate change is real but exaggerated for pinko commie b.llsh.t ends.Fishnut wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 pmI guess the question then is how do we counter this? I was listening to a podcast that explained that the reason climate change has become so politicised is that a lot of the solutions require government intervention and global responses which goes very much against the small government ethos of the right. It's therefore seen as a left-wing plot to expand government. Are there any ways to address those fears? Are there ways of talking about climate change in a way that deniers would listen to?bjn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:49 pmThey don’t care and some actually believe what they are saying. A chap I went to school with is now a conservative lobbyist in Queensland, so I get a glimpse into that world. There’s genuine belief that the science is all made up pinko nonsense. They are far scarier than the pure political players.
There are market based mechanisms that would help in mitigating climate change, simply by putting a price on emitted carbon. But the incumbent industries don’t want it. Oil and coal are soon to be dead industries anyway, due to the economics of renewables. Their denying both the environmental costs of their businesses and their imminent demise is just inflicting more damage on all of us.
Within 10 years though, they’ll both be collapsing rapidly and their deaths won’t come soon enough.
-
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am
Re: Australia is on fire
Probably not. There has been a well-orchestrated campaign to denigrate climate change as a socialist plot to take over the world. Some people have become susceptible to this due to confirmation bias. Tackling climate change will inevitably lead to higher power prices (although in Australia we got these anyway without doing much at all to tackle climate change) and people having to change they way they live. If it is all a conspiracy, then you don't have to worry about it.Fishnut wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 pmI guess the question then is how do we counter this? I was listening to a podcast that explained that the reason climate change has become so politicised is that a lot of the solutions require government intervention and global responses which goes very much against the small government ethos of the right. It's therefore seen as a left-wing plot to expand government. Are there any ways to address those fears? Are there ways of talking about climate change in a way that deniers would listen to?bjn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:49 pmThey don’t care and some actually believe what they are saying. A chap I went to school with is now a conservative lobbyist in Queensland, so I get a glimpse into that world. There’s genuine belief that the science is all made up pinko nonsense. They are far scarier than the pure political players.
At the political level in Australia climate change management is getting more support across both parties. However, at the top of the conservative parties there remain those who are finding ways to delay action. This is not helped by a small number of politicians actively promoting the coal industry. The resources minister Matt Canavan is pushing for the building of new coal-fired power stations.
Here grows much rhubarb.
Re: Australia is on fire
The higher power prices is not a given. Right now, building new renewables is cheaper than operating existing coal plants in the US and Europe.
Re: Australia is on fire
The prices for renewables are continuing to drop and goodness knows where the floor is. Coal is going to be a dead industry soon enough. But it will cause horrendous problems as it goes kicking to it's grave.
-
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 am
Re: Australia is on fire
Every place that has so far moved has found replacing coal with renewables has increased power costs.
Over the longer run, this may not continue, particularly as economies of scale are making some renewable infrastructure cheaper.
On the transition to renewables in South Australia, the incentives to get renewables in place and the costs of managing the network during the change resulted in higher power prices. It is not so much the electricity that is more expensive, but the costs associated with the infrastructure and management.
As older coal fired power plants reach the ends of their lives, the costs of replacement are so significant in Australia that companies have balked at building new ones - hence Canavan wanting the Government to make it happen. They have chosen less risky options.
Over the longer run, this may not continue, particularly as economies of scale are making some renewable infrastructure cheaper.
On the transition to renewables in South Australia, the incentives to get renewables in place and the costs of managing the network during the change resulted in higher power prices. It is not so much the electricity that is more expensive, but the costs associated with the infrastructure and management.
As older coal fired power plants reach the ends of their lives, the costs of replacement are so significant in Australia that companies have balked at building new ones - hence Canavan wanting the Government to make it happen. They have chosen less risky options.
Here grows much rhubarb.
Re: Australia is on fire
Looks like rain, thank f.ck.
The half-truths, repeated, authenticated themselves.
Re: Australia is on fire
Parts of Australia have trade winds I believe? These are particularly well suited to deliver stable wind power.Chris Preston wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:27 pmEvery place that has so far moved has found replacing coal with renewables has increased power costs.
Over the longer run, this may not continue, particularly as economies of scale are making some renewable infrastructure cheaper.
On the transition to renewables in South Australia, the incentives to get renewables in place and the costs of managing the network during the change resulted in higher power prices. It is not so much the electricity that is more expensive, but the costs associated with the infrastructure and management.
As older coal fired power plants reach the ends of their lives, the costs of replacement are so significant in Australia that companies have balked at building new ones - hence Canavan wanting the Government to make it happen. They have chosen less risky options.
Re: Australia is on fire
According to this article for the years 2008-2017 increased use of renewables in the USA either didn’t affect the wholesale electricity cost, or reduced it somewhat. That’s with older more expensive renewable generation plant than is available now.
Re: Australia is on fire
Quoting your ArsTechnica link:bjn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:25 amAccording to this article for the years 2008-2017 increased use of renewables in the USA either didn’t affect the wholesale electricity cost, or reduced it somewhat. That’s with older more expensive renewable generation plant than is available now.
Wholesale prices are dropping, though mostly due to natural gas.
Re: Australia is on fire
I was replying to Chris's post where he said renewables drive up electricity prices, this article shows that they haven't in the US. They were either neutral or drove the cost down marginally, which I thought I said. From the same article.bmforre wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:26 pmQuoting your ArsTechnica link:bjn wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:25 amAccording to this article for the years 2008-2017 increased use of renewables in the USA either didn’t affect the wholesale electricity cost, or reduced it somewhat. That’s with older more expensive renewable generation plant than is available now.Wholesale prices are dropping, though mostly due to natural gas.
This was for the renewables installed between 2008-2017. Given that since 2010, the cost (LCOE) has declined by 88% for solar and 71% for onshore wind, and continue to fall. Do that same calculation over the next 10 years and renewables will have a similar impact in driving prices down as did gas, as industrial scale solar is now cheaper than gas for many parts of the world.But renewables have had an influence as well. That influence has ranged from roughly neutral to a cost reduction of $2.2 per MWh in California, largely driven by solar. While the impact of renewables was relatively minor, it is the second-largest influence after natural gas prices, and the data shows that wind and solar are reducing prices rather than increasing them.
Re: Australia is on fire
That should work well in California where solar electricity can power air condition needed to cool houses against sun heat. It cannot warm us in winter in Northern climates.
At present we have sunrise 09:18 and sunset 14:54 here I live and the Sun is not much above the landscape at all so 10 to 14 and low solar angle is more realistic.
Germany, a way south from Norway, doesn't get much power from solar either at this time of year. Therefor that the cost (LCOE) has declined by 88% for solar is of limited help here now.
At present we have sunrise 09:18 and sunset 14:54 here I live and the Sun is not much above the landscape at all so 10 to 14 and low solar angle is more realistic.
Germany, a way south from Norway, doesn't get much power from solar either at this time of year. Therefor that the cost (LCOE) has declined by 88% for solar is of limited help here now.
Re: Australia is on fire
We are getting off topic. As I’ve said before, the population in the high latitudes is a statistical blip in terms of population and carbon emissions. The vast majority live much closer to the equator where it is much more relevant.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: Australia is on fire
Yesterday I had lunch with some visitors of the Future Industries Institute in Adelaide. They're over interviewing our students for placements. It was interesting chatting to them about things like energy security and climate and related technologies.
Re: Australia is on fire
So Germany is a statistical blip and Sahara is the future?