COVID-19

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Locked
User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Re: COVID-19

Post by bob sterman » Wed Jun 30, 2021 6:41 am

lpm wrote:
Tue Jun 29, 2021 9:23 pm
But there will still be voluntary distancing and masks, which should knock a chunk off R.
The trouble with voluntary distancing is it takes two to (do the 2m) tango. Hard to voluntarily distance in public areas from.others who don't want to.

And the trouble with voluntary masks in the community to reduce transmission is that to reduce R we really need people who are infectious to wear them - not people who are worried about being infected.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:22 am


Vaccine passports: It's all over! Cabinet agrees it's time to 'live with Covid'... and you WON'T have to show proof of vaccination to attend mass gatherings

[...]

The move comes amid growing confidence that Boris Johnson will press ahead with plans to lift social distancing rules next month despite a surge in Covid cases.

He told the Cabinet yesterday that our vaccination success means Britain will be able to 'live with Covid' because the link between virus cases and hospitalisations has been broken.

Yesterday saw another 20,479 cases – with the seven-day total up 70 per cent in a week – but one government source said Freedom Day would go ahead as planned even if cases are more than twice as high as they are now.

'We need to get used to the idea of treating Covid more like flu,' the source said. 'People have the flu vaccine, which helps reduce serious illness, but we still get large numbers of cases and significant numbers of deaths.

'When we get to July 19, cases look like they will be potentially very high, perhaps as many as 30,000 or 40,000 per day. But that is not in itself a reason not to go ahead, provided hospitalisations and deaths remain at relatively low levels.'

[...]

A Downing Street spokesman said: 'Cabinet agreed that once we have completed the road map, we will be able to live with Covid in the future – even if cases continue to rise – thanks to the protections provided by the vaccine.'


In what appeared to be a co-ordinated series of interventions, Michael Gove said people will have to live with Covid in 'the way that we live with flu', which claims thousands of deaths each winter but does not require society and the economy to be locked down.

Home Secretary Priti Patel also addressed the issue, saying Britons would have to 'adapt' to living with coronavirus. The shift follows the appointment of Sajid Javid as Health Secretary following Matt Hancock's resignation. In a declaration of intent, Mr Javid used his first Commons appearance on Monday to drive home the message that it was time to 'start returning to normal' after 15 months of crippling curbs.

Ministers now look almost certain to lift the main social distancing measures on July 19 – but debates continue over whether to carry on asking people to wear masks on public transport and work from home.

[...]

One issue that appears to have been settled is that of Covid passports. Whitehall sources told the Mail that they will be shelved for domestic use, despite ongoing trials at Wimbledon and Wembley. Pilot schemes have controlled access to mass events by requiring those in attendance to supply proof that they have been vaccinated or tested for Covid.

Ministers now believe that the success of our vaccination programme means such measures will not be required across Britain this summer, avoiding another potential clash with MPs.

[...]

'It is looking unlikely that we will have to make Covid certification compulsory, even for mass events,' a source said.

'It will be needed for foreign travel and some events may choose to run their own schemes, but it does not look like we will need legislation at this stage.

'The work has not been wasted. It will be needed for travel and we will have a system in place which could be used if we need it in the winter.' Indeed, plans for widespread use of the passports could be revived in the event of another major wave of Covid. This would allow venues to stay open even if cases soar dramatically. No 10 said the PM was 'increasingly confident' there would be no need for further delays to lifting curbs on our freedoms.
From The Mail

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:23 am

jdc wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:31 am
Herainestold wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:58 am
In the face of Delta, with a vaccine efficacy of 90% you need population coverage of 97%.
Or maybe it was the other way around. In either case it is not possible. Not without vaccinating children.

Without enough vaccination, the only way to get immunity is through infection, and Delta is very good at that, it won't take long to confer immunity to the rest of the unvaccinated population.

I just hope the morgues are ready for the onslaught.
Sounds about right - r0 of 7, 86% coverage needed for herd immunity with 100% effective vaccine. VE of .9 would make it 95.55% needed if me maths is right.

Do we have reliable figures on vaccine efficacy against transmission of delta?
It’s more like 60-70% depending upon the vaccine. I’ll try to find the data.

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:48 am

Greater Manchester's pandemic death rate has been 25 per cent higher than the national average, new research reveals - warning the scale of England's pandemic divide was ‘avoidable’ and that its causes must finally be urgently addressed by ministers.

Sir Michael Marmot, whose report weeks before Covid-19 warned health was already ‘faltering’ in England and regional divides widening after a decade of uneven austerity, also finds nearly four months more was wiped off male life expectancy in the North West last year than the national average.

His report, looking at the impact of the pandemic in Greater Manchester and proposing steps to ‘build back fairer’, also finds that lockdowns were not timed to chime with the pattern of the pandemic here, while the measures themselves have already ‘particularly damaging’ social, health and economic impacts.

Sir Michael told the M.E.N. the extent of the uneven pattern had been ‘avoidable’, pointing to long-term trends over more than a decade that resulted in this part of the country being more exposed to the pandemic.

“The pandemic, Covid, is not just about a virus,” he said. “It’s about the nature of society.”

Sir Michael’s report has strong echoes of his review of health inequality in late February 2020, which found that life expectancy was falling for the poorest people in every part of England outside London, a pattern particularly pronounced in parts of the North and a sign, he said, that society was effectively moving backwards.

His latest review looks at the way Covid then ‘exposed and amplified’ that inequality for Greater Manchester and seeks solutions, echoing warnings from officials and politicians reported by the M.E.N. previously.

Arguably most stark is its findings on the pandemic’s deadliest impacts.

“While England has experienced high Covid-19 mortality rates compared with other countries, the rate in Greater Manchester has been even higher than the average in England,” finds the report.

“Analysis shows that rates of mortality from Covid-19 in Greater Manchester are 25pc higher than in England as a whole.

“Life expectancy in the North West of England also declined more during 2020 than in England overall.”

That fell by 0.9 years for women and 1.3 years for men nationally, according to provisional figures for last year, but in the North West the figures were 1.2 years and 1.6 years respectively.

These are ‘jaw dropping’ falls, said Sir Michael, but noted they were ‘even bigger’ in this part of the country.

“That’s enormous,” he said of the North West’s fall in life expectancy, adding that there is also a ‘remarkable’ correlation with poverty.

Every borough within Greater Manchester has seen higher than average death rates, apart from Stockport and Trafford, highlighting inequalities within the conurbation as well as with the rest of the country.

Poverty, working and living conditions, types of employment and the ‘interconnected’ nature of Greater Manchester all partly explain Covid’s impact here, it says, but it also finds that the timings of lockdown measures did not marry up with the pattern of the way the virus was playing out here.

“The timing of the containment measures implemented in England did not align well with the trajectory of the pandemic in the city region,” it finds, echoing criticisms from other health experts that the first lockdown ended too soon for the pandemic's pattern here.

“The city region has also experienced particularly damaging longer-term economic, social and health effects from a combination of local and national lockdowns during the autumn of 2020 and through the first half of 2021.

“Impacts include deteriorating community and environmental conditions as the public purse is further strained, widening inequalities during children’s early years and in educational engagement and attainment, increasing poverty and income inequality, rising unemployment, particularly for young people, and deteriorating mental health for all age groups but again particularly for young people.

“All of these negative impacts will damage health and widen health inequalities in Greater Manchester. This report assesses these unequal impacts and makes proposals about how to take urgent, remedial action.”

Sir Michael and his team from University College London, who have been working on the report with the Greater Manchester system, specify a range of ways in which the conurbation was already more vulnerable to a health crisis such as Covid-19, pointing to the clear correlation between degrees of poverty and those most likely to catch the virus, suffer serious illness and potentially die from it.

Nearly half of Manchester’s neighbourhoods are in the poorest 10pc nationally, it points out, while nearly one in 20 people across the conurbation live in overcrowded housing.

That rises to more than one in ten people from ethnic minority backgrounds across the North West. Everywhere in Greater Manchester apart from Trafford and Stockport - again - already had higher than average numbers of people on low incomes. Trafford and Stockport were the only boroughs to begin the pandemic with above-average life expectancy and the only ones not to see above-average death rates from Covid.

Speaking yesterday, Sir Michael explained how poverty, types of work and housing have all had a direct bearing on higher the likelihood of people in most parts of Greater Manchester catching Covid and becoming sick.

“When you’ve got something like a pandemic it builds on the existing inequalities," he said. "So, for example, if you’re in a low income household you’re more likely to be working in a frontline occupation which means you get greater exposure which means that poorer people are more at risk of getting Covid and severe Covid and fatal Covid.

“And similarly if you’re in an overcrowded household, you’re at greater risk of transmission of infection and getting severe Covid and potentially Covid.”

The report points - like its predecessor in February 2020 - to the uneven way in which cuts have played out across the country since 2010 and warns that had a bearing on how the pandemic played out.

Cuts to public health funding saw the North West lose more per head than the national average over eight years, while the North East lost twice as much per person as much as the South East. Northern urban councils were consistently hit with bigger budget cuts than southern shire ones.

“The cuts to funding were regressive – poorer areas and those areas outside London and the South experienced proportionately larger cuts,” says the latest report.

“The resulting damage to local authorities with greater deprivation have affected the course of the pandemic and, crucially, the resilience of areas to cope with the economic and social impacts of pandemic containment measures.”

Asked whether the scale of the unequal patterns seen during the pandemic were avoidable, Sir Michael pointed to those uneven cuts.

“That was government policy," he said. "So was it avoidable? Yeah, of course it was avoidable.

“Different policies might have yielded different outcomes.”

His latest review now calls on government to urgently take heed of its findings as part of any ‘levelling up’ agenda.

It reels off a list of practical recommendations, many of them aimed at the local leadership, including working with employers to introduce a Greater Manchester wage that matches the income needed for a healthy life here and a goal to provide training or education to all school-leavers.

But many will require government to spend more and spend differently - such as a doubling of Greater Manchester’s health prevention budget in five years.

Sir Michael said it had been ‘inspiring’ working with Greater Manchester on the research.

“I didn’t get the sense that people were looking at this and thinking 'it's too awful, there’s nothing we can do about it’,” he said.

“They say: we want to make Greater Manchester the best place for children to grow up and for people to flourish. But they can’t do it without government funding as well.”

Local government organisations all over the country - including the North East - had been in touch about working to mitigate the uneven impact of the pandemic on health, he says, but as yet he had ‘not had a response’ to the report from ministers.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk ... y-20932480

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8241
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: COVID-19

Post by shpalman » Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:05 am

Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:22 am

Vaccine passports: It's all over! Cabinet agrees it's time to 'live with Covid'... and you WON'T have to show proof of vaccination to attend mass gatherings

[...]

The move comes amid growing confidence that Boris Johnson will press ahead with plans to lift social distancing rules next month despite a surge in Covid cases.

He told the Cabinet yesterday that our vaccination success means Britain will be able to 'live with Covid' because the link between virus cases and hospitalisations has been broken.

Yesterday saw another 20,479 cases – with the seven-day total up 70 per cent in a week – but one government source said Freedom Day would go ahead as planned even if cases are more than twice as high as they are now.

'We need to get used to the idea of treating Covid more like flu,' the source said. 'People have the flu vaccine, which helps reduce serious illness, but we still get large numbers of cases and significant numbers of deaths.

'When we get to July 19, cases look like they will be potentially very high, perhaps as many as 30,000 or 40,000 per day.
I'm expecting more than 30,000 new cases today.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:28 am

shpalman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:05 am
I'm expecting more than 30,000 new cases today.
I think that the weekend is more likely. But yes, this seems like another case of ministers being hopelessly behind where the curve is going.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8241
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: COVID-19

Post by shpalman » Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:53 am

Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:28 am
shpalman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:05 am
I'm expecting more than 30,000 new cases today.
I think that the weekend is more likely. But yes, this seems like another case of ministers being hopelessly behind where the curve is going.
I'm saying that because there's usually a jump in case numbers mid-week, as a day-of-the-week effect. But the 7-day average (which is less than 18,000 per day right now) won't go above 30,000 for another week or so.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:56 am

shpalman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:53 am
Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:28 am
shpalman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:05 am
I'm expecting more than 30,000 new cases today.
I think that the weekend is more likely. But yes, this seems like another case of ministers being hopelessly behind where the curve is going.
I'm saying that because there's usually a jump in case numbers mid-week, as a day-of-the-week effect. But the 7-day average (which is less than 18,000 per day right now) won't go above 30,000 for another week or so.
Yes, that could happen.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:33 am

bob sterman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 6:41 am
lpm wrote:
Tue Jun 29, 2021 9:23 pm
But there will still be voluntary distancing and masks, which should knock a chunk off R.
The trouble with voluntary distancing is it takes two to (do the 2m) tango. Hard to voluntarily distance in public areas from.others who don't want to.

And the trouble with voluntary masks in the community to reduce transmission is that to reduce R we really need people who are infectious to wear them - not people who are worried about being infected.
Sure, but don't forget Test & Trace. The UK is a massive tester of its population and we're now picking up a higher % of cases than in the 1st and 2nd waves. We're even getting more asymptomatic cases, via mass testing of every pupil in a year group for example. Gone are the days when the actual cases were 2x to 3x official cases, it's now probably more like 1.5x to 2x.

And when people know they are infected, they mostly isolate. The virus hits a lot of dead ends. The Trace part in the UK has obviously been a fiasco but there's voluntary tracing - people with a positive test generally inform all their recent contacts personally, leading to others getting tested or even voluntarily isolating. This isn't going to stop on 19 July.

I don't think we can take a biological R number of 7, say, and assume that applies universally across entire populations or from country to country and do a simple 1-1/R thing. In the UK the virus is struggling to do its work in secret, it gets locked away in single individuals and it's hindered by some basic measures like masks and change in habits. I'm pretty sure we've suffered from having zero vaccination cohorts leading to heatmap fires in the young groups - for the last two months it's had a lovely time with superspreader events in schools and young people socialising. Those avenues for it are shutting down (at least until Sept).

I don't think it's right to just do maths of R=7=86% and vaccine efficacy=67% and the rest of the sums. It's more like R=7 but Test & Trace cuts that in half to 3.5, and basic voluntary measures and people not behaving normally takes it to 3.0, and outdoor summer life without schools temporarily takes it to 2.5.

This would give herd immunity for adults-only socialising together - adults at 90% vaccinated at 67% efficacy the maths gives immunity at R=2.5. Obviously in the real world everyone mixes to some degree with children and at a total population level we'll only be 75% vaccinated/immune. This would require sufficient lockdown measures to get R down to 2 which isn't going to happen.

It's pretty obvious the govt is f.cking up - but not by as much as previous waves. For safety there should have been a firebreak lockdown to buy a bit more time, strict masks and ventilation in school etc, vaccination for 12-18. I think schools in Scotland are now closed for the summer hols? England schools should shut early. But obviously the govt isn't going to do any of that. The question is: will we scrape through along a very narrow cliff edge this summer? I think we will. But clearly we should be taking steps to move a bit away from the edge.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by Woodchopper » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:12 am

lpm wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:33 am
I don't think it's right to just do maths of R=7=86% and vaccine efficacy=67% and the rest of the sums. It's more like R=7 but Test & Trace cuts that in half to 3.5, and basic voluntary measures and people not behaving normally takes it to 3.0, and outdoor summer life without schools temporarily takes it to 2.5.
Yes, indeed. Despite Delta, based upon case numbers R is currently about 1.5. So everything is bringing it down to nearly below 1. That everything will be a consequence of vaccines, and also all the other behaviour designed to reduce transmission.

User avatar
shpalman
Princess POW
Posts: 8241
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
Location: One step beyond
Contact:

Re: COVID-19

Post by shpalman » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:20 am

Whatever's happening already to reduce R, it needs to happen more/better, because R_t is quite obviously above 1 and it needs to be less than 1.

SAGE scientist says that cases could spike in the autumn apparently unaware that cases are spiking already.

He also says
that test and trace was still not working properly or contacting people quickly enough, and pointed to the lack of support for people to self-isolate.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk

OffTheRock
Fuzzable
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 6:52 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by OffTheRock » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:28 am

And when people know they are infected, they mostly isolate. The virus hits a lot of dead ends. The Trace part in the UK has obviously been a fiasco but there's voluntary tracing - people with a positive test generally inform all their recent contacts personally, leading to others getting tested or even voluntarily isolating. This isn't going to stop on 19 July.

You haven’t been on the Mumsnet Coronavirus board recently, have you? :D Or ever, but they are particularly bad at the moment.

Rule number 1) if it doesn’t come from test & trace it isn’t legally binding and you should ignore.
2) It it’s from a school, see point number 1.

Took an alarming number of posts for someone to tell a poster they were right and they would need to cancel their holiday because their child’s class bubble burst. And those posters were in a minority.

User avatar
Seagull
Sindis Poop
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:25 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Seagull » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:33 am

Oh God, yes, and it's full of people asserting that a negative PCR test at the start of a notified isolation means the kids/family can just carry on as they wish for the remainder (going on holidays etc). :|

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:38 am

Existence of rule breakers isn't evidence of anything. They've always been present.

What matters is change. Are more people ignoring their social responsibilities - e.g. because Mum & Dad & Grandma are all vaccinated? It's possible.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 4746
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by Grumble » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:40 am

My daughter’s class has now got 10 or 11 confirmed cases, my daughter has tested negative but has some symptoms in common with those positive. But the real reason for my post is to say that only 1 person has been contacted by track and trace. This is a group who are all known. Does the school have an official role here? If so why the one person being contacted another way? If not why hasn’t everyone been contacted?
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three

OffTheRock
Fuzzable
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 6:52 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by OffTheRock » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:56 am

Yes, the T&T in schools was farmed out to the schools themselves. So they take advice from local public health about which children need to isolate and then the school are responsible for contacting parents. It’s as legally binding as being contacted by T&T.

It’s a definite change lpm. The rule breakers have always been there and like most social media, they’re a vocal minority. There’s also quite likely a fair few Us4Them plants. But the last month seems to have got worse. Wimbledon, school bubbles bursting all over the place and now the business thing seems to have changed everything.

I’m fairly certain the thread yesterday would have got completely different replies a month ago.

User avatar
Bird on a Fire
Princess POW
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: COVID-19

Post by Bird on a Fire » Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:59 am

I'm intrigued by lpm's claim that test and trace is working well, because last I heard it was sh.t. That was possibly ages ago, though - what's changed and when?
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:07 am

Test has worked well for months. Trace has always been sh.t.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
bob sterman
Dorkwood
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
Location: Location Location

Re: COVID-19

Post by bob sterman » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:34 am

lpm wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:33 am
And when people know they are infected, they mostly isolate. The virus hits a lot of dead ends. The Trace part in the UK has obviously been a fiasco but there's voluntary tracing - people with a positive test generally inform all their recent contacts personally, leading to others getting tested or even voluntarily isolating. This isn't going to stop on 19 July.
In the UK, when people know they are infected - most do not isolate themselves fully for the required period.

The CORSAIR study between March 2020 and January 2021 found that only 42.5% of respondents were fully adhering to isolation requirements when symptomatic. And of course people who bother to fill in surveys are a generally more conscientious subset of the population.

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n608

User avatar
headshot
Dorkwood
Posts: 1414
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:40 am

Re: COVID-19

Post by headshot » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:37 am

shpalman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:20 am
Whatever's happening already to reduce R, it needs to happen more/better, because R_t is quite obviously above 1 and it needs to be less than 1.
Thing is, it now seems like the Govt position on this is that R doesn't need to be <1 because those at risk of serious illness/death are protected.

They're now committed to treating it like any other endemic disease such as flu.

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: COVID-19

Post by sTeamTraen » Wed Jun 30, 2021 2:24 pm

Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:56 am
shpalman wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:53 am
Woodchopper wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:28 am


I think that the weekend is more likely. But yes, this seems like another case of ministers being hopelessly behind where the curve is going.
I'm saying that because there's usually a jump in case numbers mid-week, as a day-of-the-week effect. But the 7-day average (which is less than 18,000 per day right now) won't go above 30,000 for another week or so.
Yes, that could happen.
In previous waves, the UK's Tuesday case numbers were typically the closest or any day to the mean for the week (Mon-Sun) that contained that Tuesday, and there were big drops in recorded cases on Sunday and Monday. In the current wave there seems to be a bit of a dip on Sunday but otherwise it's fairly even. Presumably this represents some change in the patterns of who is getting tested, where and when.

I'm going to guess 25,000 for today, which will take the UK's 14-day rate per 100,000 people to 300. The Royle [sic] Family would probably make a macabre sweepstake out of this.
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:04 pm

26,068.

Thanks to all who played.
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: COVID-19

Post by sTeamTraen » Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:24 pm

That brings the UK's 14-day rate to 318 - I miscalculated in my previous post. The last time it was this high was on 14 February 2021. The most recent higher one-day case total was on 15 January (28,811).
Last edited by sTeamTraen on Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Something something hammer something something nail

User avatar
lpm
Junior Mod
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:05 pm

Re: COVID-19

Post by lpm » Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:28 pm

Has anybody seen figures for how many people catch cold per day, or flu? Presumably it all comes from models, because only a fraction of cases present to GPs or get hospitalised.

How does 100,000 cases a day compare? During a bad flu wave is it similar numbers?
⭐ Awarded gold star 4 November 2021

User avatar
sTeamTraen
After Pie
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Re: COVID-19

Post by sTeamTraen » Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:34 pm

lpm wrote:
Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:28 pm
Has anybody seen figures for how many people catch cold per day, or flu? Presumably it all comes from models, because only a fraction of cases present to GPs or get hospitalised.

How does 100,000 cases a day compare? During a bad flu wave is it similar numbers?
It's estimated that about 14 million Americans get flu each year (source: this, followed by in-my-head calculation of the total cases for the last 10 years in Table 1). That would scale to 2.8 million Brits. Assume they all get it at an equal rate and that all the cases occur in a 100-day winter season from early December to mid-March, that would be 28,000 per day. But again, that's estimated total cases, whereas today's 26,068 is confirmed cases with a test. I think we can assume that there are at least some people with Covid going "oh crap" and staying in for a few days, without getting tested.

Also I think the natural R rate of flu is probably lower than for Covid, especially since there is a degree of past immunity to flu in the population. You don't hear about half a football team going down with flu, or over half of a party of 500 school leavers getting it in a single weekend as we had just recently in Mallorca.
Something something hammer something something nail

Locked