Re: Blyatskrieg
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:11 pm
Footage shows a small planing boat that one presumes is an uncrewed surface loitering munition getting right up alongside a frigate - too exhausted to confirm ID, but Grigorovich class certainly plausible - before the feed cuts out. A detonation of a warhead of any size there will have caused damage.Formerly AvP wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 2:32 pm Reports of a Ukrainian drone attack on Russian ships in Sevastopol, including surface drones
https://twitter.com/CovertShores?ref_sr ... r%5Eauthor
Edit: Admiral Makarov may have been damaged, video in link
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1586 ... 17/video/1
She took over as flagship after Moskva sank, and is a very modern Admiral Grigorovich class frigate.
H I Sutton's analysis of what we knowEACLucifer wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 5:50 pmFootage shows a small planing boat that one presumes is an uncrewed surface loitering munition getting right up alongside a frigate - too exhausted to confirm ID, but Grigorovich class certainly plausible - before the feed cuts out. A detonation of a warhead of any size there will have caused damage.Formerly AvP wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 2:32 pm Reports of a Ukrainian drone attack on Russian ships in Sevastopol, including surface drones
https://twitter.com/CovertShores?ref_sr ... r%5Eauthor
Edit: Admiral Makarov may have been damaged, video in link
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1586 ... 17/video/1
She took over as flagship after Moskva sank, and is a very modern Admiral Grigorovich class frigate.
However, unlikely to cause any damage below the waterline, and ship near port, so survival likely.
This like early days SAS stuff. Which of course was formed to fight against Nazis, so even more appropriate.EACLucifer wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:34 am Someone managed to sneak onto a Russian airfield hundreds of miles from the border and plant timebombs on several helicopters. There is some footage circulating, which shows the use of professional, regular equipment, nothing improvised, suggesting that the saboteur was well-resourced.
The attack apparently distributed a pair of Ka-52s over a large area, and also claimed an Mi-28 and damaged a couple of others.
So far, no claims of having arrested the saboteur. I hope, of course, that he got clean away, but this sort of mission is very dangerous.
One remarkable thing about the video is that it was filmed in broad daylight and the saboteur didn't seem to be worried about being seen. Perhaps the guards have all been sent off to the front.EACLucifer wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:34 am Someone managed to sneak onto a Russian airfield hundreds of miles from the border and plant timebombs on several helicopters. There is some footage circulating, which shows the use of professional, regular equipment, nothing improvised, suggesting that the saboteur was well-resourced.
The attack apparently distributed a pair of Ka-52s over a large area, and also claimed an Mi-28 and damaged a couple of others.
So far, no claims of having arrested the saboteur. I hope, of course, that he got clean away, but this sort of mission is very dangerous.
Except that somehow Ukraine got hold of the footage and shared it, which argues in favour of Ukrainian involvementTopBadger wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:13 pm For all we know the saboteur could be Russian aircrew who decided they'd rather their helicopter blew up on the ground whilst they were far away than blown up in the air whilst they were inside...
But not very strongly, given the number of videos from inside Russia that are around in coverage of the war.jimbob wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:47 pmExcept that somehow Ukraine got hold of the footage and shared it, which argues in favour of Ukrainian involvementTopBadger wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:13 pm For all we know the saboteur could be Russian aircrew who decided they'd rather their helicopter blew up on the ground whilst they were far away than blown up in the air whilst they were inside...
And Czech time fuzes, too.jimbob wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:47 pmExcept that somehow Ukraine got hold of the footage and shared it, which argues in favour of Ukrainian involvementTopBadger wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:13 pm For all we know the saboteur could be Russian aircrew who decided they'd rather their helicopter blew up on the ground whilst they were far away than blown up in the air whilst they were inside...
One of the chapters of The Art of War is about intelligence and espionage, so that's ~2500 years ago.EACLucifer wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 10:03 pmRecruiting insiders has been done since...well, there's records of it about as far back as there are records of warfare.
Apparently the Russians are destroying mobile phone masts: https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/sta ... SzhThKtZawEACLucifer wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 10:44 am Very mixed messages re: Kherson right now.
Over the last couple of weeks the Russians have been reinforcing parts of the defensive ring round the city, and holding off Ukrainian attacks in the north of the theatre.
But they've also been stealing everything not nailed down, and a number of things that are nailed down too. And digging in pillboxes on the Kinburn peninsula and otherwise south of the Dnipro.
Now there's talk of abandoned checkpoints, and photos of the regional administration building with no Russians in sight and no Russian flag.
Keep an eye on the oblast, and try to avoid making conclusions from single data points, as a lot of them are conflicting.
That really should be controllable in software from a central location, rather than needing towers to be demolished.Martin Y wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 2:10 pm It's possible they have a more short-term concern, wanting to deprive locals of a phone network so they can't report on Russian positions, rather than caring what happens afterward if they have to withdraw.
But you can easily see how breaking the thing in real space negates the need to fight for control of it in cyber space...dyqik wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 2:17 pmThat really should be controllable in software from a central location, rather than needing towers to be demolished.Martin Y wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 2:10 pm It's possible they have a more short-term concern, wanting to deprive locals of a phone network so they can't report on Russian positions, rather than caring what happens afterward if they have to withdraw.
Quite possibly. They'd previously cut internet cables and phone cables that run beneath the surface. This is making life radically harder for civilians, as you might imagine, including greatly complicating access to medicine.Martin Y wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 2:10 pm It's possible they have a more short-term concern, wanting to deprive locals of a phone network so they can't report on Russian positions, rather than caring what happens afterward if they have to withdraw.