This proposal is not the usual type of split market proposal, rather it is much more highly interventionist. In particular it envisages NESO becoming single buyer of electricity, who then sells on to customers, presumably at some kind of posted tariffs.
The NESO will buy from gas generators according to RAB-based model, in effect bringing gas generators in tothe regulated sector, like water companies, energy transmission and distribution companies, etc. I think competition is always a better idea than that. You are still going to have to pay them what they pay for gas, it doesn't make the gas price spike go away.
For other suppliers, if there is CfD, the more modern arrangement, NESO will buy from them according to that. If they haven't got a CfD, they will get power purchase agreements related to their costs as set out at the time of the subsidy arrangement.
This seems to me to be "Something must be done, here is something, so do it".
Here is
Citizens Advice talking about split market proposals, and expressing the opinion that there are risks and downsides with it. This in turn refers to an
Oxford IES (Keay and Robinson) explicit proposal for a split market, and also an alternative
UCL proposal they call a Green Power Pool.
There's no running away from the high price of gas. To the extent that we burn gas to generate electricity, we are going to have to pay the price of it. The problem is that gas-based electricity prices most of the time are giving non-gas generators, especially the older legacy pre-CfD ones, windfall profits, paid for through high prices to consumers, especially when international crises push up the price of gas.
These older proposals for dealing with this seem more plausible than this Common-Wealth one. The idea of pulling gas generators into a RAB approach seems mad, and an unnecessary feature of addressing the problem, as these older proposals indicate. But as Citizens Advice points out, these older proposals are not without their problems. We also have to remember that we have a lot of interconnectors to the continent and Ireland, that are becoming increasingly important as we decarbonise. Although we have been kicked out of the single European energy market, they have such a market, and we need to be able to interact with it in a market-based way. I do not understand the issues that would arise in relation to such international trade.