Misfits

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Misfits

Post by plodder »

You're right of course. It's a hugely plausible narrative though. When you look at people like Johnson, Hancock, Cummings etc that is exactly how I'd expect them to behave.
User avatar
Woodchopper
Princess POW
Posts: 7508
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am

Re: Misfits

Post by Woodchopper »

plodder wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:22 pm You're right of course. It's a hugely plausible narrative though. When you look at people like Johnson, Hancock, Cummings etc that is exactly how I'd expect them to behave.
The most effective lies are partly based upon truth. Some of what Cummings claims may well have happened. But his testimony was very self serving and was intended to protect his reputation and advance his career.
User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5665
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Misfits

Post by jimbob »

Woodchopper wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:45 pm
plodder wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:22 pm You're right of course. It's a hugely plausible narrative though. When you look at people like Johnson, Hancock, Cummings etc that is exactly how I'd expect them to behave.
The most effective lies are partly based upon truth. Some of what Cummings claims may well have happened. But his testimony was very self serving and was intended to protect his reputation and advance his career.
Exactly. He might know where the bodies are buried (sadly almost literally) but he's a proven* liar, and unless he backs anything up with credible evidence - it's worthless.


*and proven to lie needlessly - where the lies are easily disproven and they are unrelated to the implausible story he wants us to believe.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8368
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Misfits

Post by dyqik »

Woodchopper wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:45 pm
plodder wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:22 pm You're right of course. It's a hugely plausible narrative though. When you look at people like Johnson, Hancock, Cummings etc that is exactly how I'd expect them to behave.
The most effective lies are partly based upon truth. Some of what Cummings claims may well have happened. But his testimony was very self serving and was intended to protect his reputation and advance his career.
A psychopathic self-server will use the truth where it serves his purposes, and lie when the truth is inconvenient.
User avatar
jimbob
Light of Blast
Posts: 5665
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:04 pm
Location: High Peak/Manchester

Re: Misfits

Post by jimbob »

dyqik wrote: Thu May 27, 2021 5:15 pm
Woodchopper wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:45 pm
plodder wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:22 pm You're right of course. It's a hugely plausible narrative though. When you look at people like Johnson, Hancock, Cummings etc that is exactly how I'd expect them to behave.
The most effective lies are partly based upon truth. Some of what Cummings claims may well have happened. But his testimony was very self serving and was intended to protect his reputation and advance his career.
A psychopathic self-server will use the truth where it serves his purposes, and lie when the truth is inconvenient.
Exactly, he is only useful where he provides supporting evidence or shows where it can be found

Although one could ask why, if he's such a liar he was allowed anywhere near government.
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
plodder
Stummy Beige
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:50 pm

Re: Misfits

Post by plodder »

User avatar
Sciolus
Dorkwood
Posts: 1455
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:42 pm

Re: Misfits

Post by Sciolus »

I would rather hope hope that Cummings didn't leave his job and take a load of papers with him. Any employer would take a dim view of that, let alone a government. So I'm not sure what written evidence he's expected to provide.
Post Reply