Re: The Invasion of Ukraine
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2023 8:49 am
Break up of USSR.
I may be being stupid here. But wouldnt WW2 population loss produce a narrowing in an older cohort - born in the mid-60's to mid-70's, and a similar but rather smaller narrowing around 20-25 years later. In Russia and even more so in Ukraine you can see the reduction in the older group - just about, but the group born around the end of the last century is even smaller. Poland doesnt really reflect that.jimbob wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 8:13 amUkraine and Poland suffered a greater proportion of deaths in WWII than any other countries.Imrael wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 7:37 am The same graph for Ukraine is even more pronounced - to the extent that I'm wondering if something is up with the data, or some outside event affected it. Russian aggression is too recent to affect those cohorts.
I would say the latter is the real reason.Imrael wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 8:52 am I may be being stupid here. But wouldnt WW2 population loss produce a narrowing in an older cohort - born in the mid-60's to mid-70's, and a similar but rather smaller narrowing around 20-25 years later. In Russia and even more so in Ukraine you can see the reduction in the older group - just about, but the group born around the end of the last century is even smaller. Poland doesnt really reflect that.
My only other thought is that the Ukraine population in the 20-30 range were born not too long after Ukrainian independence and maybe that depressed birth rates (Like a lot of childbearing-age young people left or something).
Thank you - interesting resource. (Got to messing about and noticed already-falling US rate took a down tick in 2008-2009. Probably a bit too much of an assumption to point to the 2008 recession, but could be)IvanV wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 9:12 amI would say the latter is the real reason.Imrael wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 8:52 am I may be being stupid here. But wouldnt WW2 population loss produce a narrowing in an older cohort - born in the mid-60's to mid-70's, and a similar but rather smaller narrowing around 20-25 years later. In Russia and even more so in Ukraine you can see the reduction in the older group - just about, but the group born around the end of the last century is even smaller. Poland doesnt really reflect that.
My only other thought is that the Ukraine population in the 20-30 range were born not too long after Ukrainian independence and maybe that depressed birth rates (Like a lot of childbearing-age young people left or something).
There was a sharp reduction in the birth rate in Russia, Ukraine, etc, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Very sharp in Russia, down by about 40%, not quite as sharp in Ukraine. With the communist social systems collapsing, spreading of income distributions, bringing up children suddenly became a lot more expensive at the same time as the cost of living went up for a large fraction of the population. Ukraine remained more Soviet in its economy for longer, which might explain the smaller fall there. In each case, it did then recover to a degree as the economies recovered. This results precisely in a particular shortage of the present 20-30 yr old cohort.
Source:
Russia
Ukraine
It'll be grain deal negotiations, but also Erdogan just can't help himself from playing both sidesTopBadger wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 12:12 pm Putin plans to visit Turkey... one wonders why a NATO member is allowing someone wanted for war crimes to visit them unless it's to make an arrest.
Yes, him and Orban.EACLucifer wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 12:34 pmIt'll be grain deal negotiations, but also Erdogan just can't help himself from playing both sidesTopBadger wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 12:12 pm Putin plans to visit Turkey... one wonders why a NATO member is allowing someone wanted for war crimes to visit them unless it's to make an arrest.![]()
Presumably, though, the demographics of the day would have fed into that too. You'd expect the birth rate to be going down sharply 30 years ago with a population like this:IvanV wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 9:12 am I would say the latter is the real reason.
There was a sharp reduction in the birth rate in Russia, Ukraine, etc, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Very sharp in Russia, down by about 40%, not quite as sharp in Ukraine. With the communist social systems collapsing, spreading of income distributions, bringing up children suddenly became a lot more expensive at the same time as the cost of living went up for a large fraction of the population. Ukraine remained more Soviet in its economy for longer, which might explain the smaller fall there. In each case, it did then recover to a degree as the economies recovered. This results precisely in a particular shortage of the present 20-30 yr old cohort.
Source:
Russia
Ukraine
Looking at this on for the USSR with smaller bins, it looks like the lag would be about 25 years (but that's not set in stone, obvs). The effect of WWII is particularly obvious, with a corresponding 2nd dip which looks like it could be large enough to cause one just after 89, coinciding with the turmoil after the collapse.TimW wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 2:51 pmPresumably, though, the demographics of the day would have fed into that too. You'd expect the birth rate to be going down sharply 30 years ago with a population like this:IvanV wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 9:12 am I would say the latter is the real reason.
There was a sharp reduction in the birth rate in Russia, Ukraine, etc, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Very sharp in Russia, down by about 40%, not quite as sharp in Ukraine. With the communist social systems collapsing, spreading of income distributions, bringing up children suddenly became a lot more expensive at the same time as the cost of living went up for a large fraction of the population. Ukraine remained more Soviet in its economy for longer, which might explain the smaller fall there. In each case, it did then recover to a degree as the economies recovered. This results precisely in a particular shortage of the present 20-30 yr old cohort.
Source:
Russia
Ukraine
1993.jpg
Woodchopper wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 7:03 amhttps://www.economist.com/united-states ... to-ukraineThe Biden administration has hitherto claimed it could “walk and chew gum” at the same time: that is, help push back Russia’s onslaught while deterring China. Even as it has rallied European allies to help Ukraine defend itself, the administration has been weaving a variety of mini-alliances in the Indo-Pacific to constrain China. Mr Blinken and Mr Austin have been criss-crossing the Pacific this week to strengthen the geopolitical “latticework”. In Brisbane on July 29th they are expected to announce a further tightening of the military alliance with Australia, including the upgrading of military bases in the country, more deployments of American forces, deeper defence-industrial ties and greater military co-operation with other countries in the region.
Typically military supplies for Ukraine have been donated from American stocks—this week it announced its 43rd PDA for Ukraine, worth $400m and bringing the total to $24bn—whereas Taiwan has bought its arms under the lengthier Foreign Military Sales system. The Pentagon says the Taiwan package will not affect supplies for Ukraine. Yet Ukraine and Taiwan are now competing for American donations and, in some cases, the same weapons, too. The backlog of Taiwanese orders, which stands at more than $14bn, includes contracts for the Javelin missile, used to stop tanks, and the Stinger, used to bring down aircraft. Large quantities of both have been supplied to Ukraine.
In contrast with the PDAs for Ukraine, Congress has not appropriated funds needed to replenish weapons being given to Taiwan. In the short term the Pentagon can probably re-allocate funds internally, say congressional staffers. But for the new Taiwan policy to be sustainable, Congress will have to appropriate money in the next fiscal year. That, in turn, will depend on the tortuous budgeting process in a divided Congress, especially the House, where “America First” admirers of Donald Trump, who are sceptical if not hostile towards Ukraine, hold greater sway.
https://www.ft.com/content/9807f021-a7d ... 05cbf4ba05The White House will ask Congress to fund arms for Taiwan as part of a supplemental budget request for Ukraine, in an effort to speed up the supply of weapons to the country amid the rising threat from China.
The Office of Management and Budget will include funding for Taiwan in the supplemental request as part of an effort to accelerate the provision of weapons, according to two people familiar with the plan.
[…]
According to the US-Taiwan Business Council, a pro-Taiwan lobby group, Taipei is still awaiting delivery of $23bn worth of weapon sales, including harpoon missiles and surveillance drones, that were approved by successive US administrations. Some sales were announced more than five years ago. US military commanders have frequently expressed frustration with the slow transfer of weapons to Taiwan to enhance its security.
[…]
The eventual congressional vote on the supplemental budget — which will focus predominantly on new military assistance for Ukraine — will be the first test of support for Kyiv in the current Congress.
A group of far-right House Republicans recently sought and failed to use the annual defence bill to restrict US support for Ukraine, a sign that even a small group of lawmakers could imperil or delay future assistance.
Packaging support for Taiwan, which has very strong bipartisan support in Congress, into the Ukraine budget may help the administration and pro-Kyiv Republicans win over members who might otherwise be opposed.
[…]
“Adding supplemental funding for Taiwan will put some House Republicans in a more difficult position since many who oppose Ukraine funding remain in favour of supporting Taiwan,” said Zack Cooper, an Asia security expert at the American Enterprise Institute think-tank.
More at the link. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ru ... 023-08-04/Russia has doubled its 2023 defence spending target to more than $100 billion - a third of all public expenditure - a government document reviewed by Reuters showed, as the costs of the war in Ukraine spiral and place growing strain on Moscow's finances.
Only another $500bn to go to catch up to what the US has spent so far this year.Woodchopper wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 12:55 pmMore at the link. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ru ... 023-08-04/Russia has doubled its 2023 defence spending target to more than $100 billion - a third of all public expenditure - a government document reviewed by Reuters showed, as the costs of the war in Ukraine spiral and place growing strain on Moscow's finances.
This is probably what actually wins the war for Ukraine.EACLucifer wrote: Tue Aug 15, 2023 12:51 pm Rouble continues to fall, worth less than a cent now. Russia's hiked interest rates to 12% to try and shore it up, but their economic position does not appear sustainable.
Russian military commissars in Crimea have reportedly come up with a new scam to get rich using the bodies of dead soldiers—by extorting the grieving family members.
That’s according to the human rights group Crimea SOS, which reported Thursday that military commissars have been lying to family members of soldiers killed in Ukraine about the whereabouts of their remains. While the bodies are already stored at a morgue in Simferopol, the group says, military officials tell families they have to pay an extra fee to have the remains retrieved from the battlefield.
1/ Injuried Russian marines near Tokmak in the occupied part of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhya region were berated and beaten unconscious by their political officer when they asked for medical assistance. The incident was recorded and illustrates how Russia's political officers work.
They were reintroduced in 2018.Martin Y wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2023 7:27 am Russian military has political officers? Have I woken up in Enemy at the Gates?
Absolutely. And we had had the model of Serbia beforehand to show what happens.EACLucifer wrote: Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:22 pm Anyone wondering how things got so bad should look back a decade, to the massacre of over a thousand Syrians with Sarin gas.
It was right across one of Obama's so-called red lines, and yet there was no adequate response. The likes of Putin took that for permission.