Page 1 of 1
Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:51 pm
by sTeamTraen
Re: Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:03 pm
by Woodchopper
Good work!
Re: Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:44 pm
by Stupidosaurus
Congratulations on the masterly restraint and understatement used to describe this stinking sack of rotten entrails masquerading as a scientific paper.
Re: Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:38 am
by Allo V Psycho
Just seen this. Still laughing/shaking head in dismay.
Re: Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:38 pm
by sTeamTraen
Hooray! It's been
retracted!
Re: Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:52 pm
by Martin Y
Succinctly damning description in the retraction notice: "... results described in the Article, in particular the outcomes of statistical analyses, are internally inconsistent and that some results are mathematically impossible"
Re: Science is f.cked, part 94
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 6:10 pm
by sTeamTraen
Martin Y wrote: Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:52 pm
Succinctly damning description in the retraction notice:
"... results described in the Article, in particular the outcomes of statistical analyses, are internally inconsistent and that some results are mathematically impossible"
It was nice of them to thank the person who brought the issues to their attention, too.
Oh, wait, they didn't do that. The information just landed on their desk
through a stargate.