Trump Tax Returns
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 10:58 pm
NYT has them and is making them public.
Guess what - he doesn't pay very much tax.
Guess what - he doesn't pay very much tax.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 ... taxes.htmlDonald J. Trump paid $750 in federal income taxes the year he won the presidency. In his first year in the White House, he paid another $750.
He had paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years — largely because he reported losing much more money than he made.
but they mostly seem pretty old-hat and entirely unsurprising to me.Among the key findings of The Times’s investigation:
Mr. Trump paid no federal income taxes in 11 of 18 years that The Times examined. In 2017, after he became president, his tax bill was only $750.
He has reduced his tax bill with questionable measures, including a $72.9 million tax refund that is the subject of an audit by the Internal Revenue Service.
Many of his signature businesses, including his golf courses, report losing large amounts of money — losses that have helped him to lower his taxes.
The financial pressure on him is increasing as hundreds of millions of dollars in loans he personally guaranteed are soon coming due.
Even while declaring losses, he has managed to enjoy a lavish lifestyle by taking tax deductions on what most people would consider personal expenses, including residences, aircraft and $70,000 in hairstyling for television.
Ivanka Trump, while working as an employee of the Trump Organization, appears to have received “consulting fees” that also helped reduce the family’s tax bill.
As president, he has received more money from foreign sources and U.S. interest groups than previously known. The records do not reveal any previously unreported connections to Russia.
All good points, but do you think his supporters really care?dyqik wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 11:59 pm Far more important is that he has hundreds of millions in loans coming due within the next four years, and no income too pay them with.
Also, $750 dollars in taxes is a number that may well cause more outrage than if it was zero. Zero is an abstraction, $750 is an outrageously small number.
It's not his supporters that matter - he can't win with just them. It's those voters that might vote for him because he's a Republican who got them their judge, or who just might not bother. Particularly if there's no Senate race where they are, etc.Boustrophedon wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:08 amAll good points, but do you think his supporters really care?dyqik wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 11:59 pm Far more important is that he has hundreds of millions in loans coming due within the next four years, and no income too pay them with.
Also, $750 dollars in taxes is a number that may well cause more outrage than if it was zero. Zero is an abstraction, $750 is an outrageously small number.
Shows what an exceptional businessman he is. (Or is it egregious?)El Pollo Diablo wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:37 am Whoopsie
Ivanka Trump got paid a shitload in consultancy fees whilst she was working as an employee. Turns out that's illegal.
https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/i ... uble/32591
What Dyqik said, though. This offers several lines of attack that might well help with people who might vote either way; it's not just that he's cheating the American people, it's also that he is clearly a very bad businessmanGrumble wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:47 am His supporters will make a virtue of this, and disbelieve it simultaneously.
Or is he a very good businessman because he gets away with it - and will this time too?EACLucifer wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:43 amWhat Dyqik said, though. This offers several lines of attack that might well help with people who might vote either way; it's not just that he's cheating the American people, it's also that he is clearly a very bad businessmanGrumble wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:47 am His supporters will make a virtue of this, and disbelieve it simultaneously.
OTOH the Supreme Court pick will long outlast Trump, and potentially hinder the ability of other presidents to pass legislation for decades.Grumble wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:02 pm All of this will be drowned out by the Supreme Court. Ironically the best way for this to impact his re-election chances is for the Supreme Court seat to be resolved quickly and not be a factor in people’s minds. IMO.
"The Economy" is the one area of policy on which Trump consistently polls better Biden amongst undecided voters. This will presumably take that away from him now.Tessa K wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:58 amOr is he a very good businessman because he gets away with it - and will this time too?EACLucifer wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:43 amWhat Dyqik said, though. This offers several lines of attack that might well help with people who might vote either way; it's not just that he's cheating the American people, it's also that he is clearly a very bad businessmanGrumble wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:47 am His supporters will make a virtue of this, and disbelieve it simultaneously.
There's also the line of attack which is that Trump promised to unrig the system, so that his white poor supporters could also take advantage to lower their taxes. Instead, he passed a tax bill that made it easier for him to screw the system while making it harder for them to reduce their taxes.EACLucifer wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 11:43 amWhat Dyqik said, though. This offers several lines of attack that might well help with people who might vote either way; it's not just that he's cheating the American people, it's also that he is clearly a very bad businessmanGrumble wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:47 am His supporters will make a virtue of this, and disbelieve it simultaneously.
That can be fixed, in several ways, if it gets out of hand. The most powerful one is that the Supreme Court is only empowered by the Constitution to rule on certain issues. Most of its power comes from more normal laws about the make-up and rule of the court, that can be changed fairly easily, with the Supreme Court being replaced by another appellate court for most issues, or even just not having a nationwide appellate court. That same procedure can also be used to increase the number of judges on the Supreme Court, to put term limits in place on it (the Constitution says that judges serve for life, but it doesn't say _where_ they serve), etc. This only needs a bare majority in the House, Senate (after ditching the filibuster) and no presidential veto.Bird on a Fire wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:19 pmOTOH the Supreme Court pick will long outlast Trump, and potentially hinder the ability of other presidents to pass legislation for decades.Grumble wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:02 pm All of this will be drowned out by the Supreme Court. Ironically the best way for this to impact his re-election chances is for the Supreme Court seat to be resolved quickly and not be a factor in people’s minds. IMO.
From ISFFlammableFlower wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 4:51 pm $70k for hair styling for TV claimed as expenses.... 'cos he's worth it...