Coul Links resurrected - more planning b.llsh.t
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2020 5:38 pm
Here we go again!
The original proposal for a totally necessary golf course in equally necessary proximity to a completely unnecessary SSRI and NNR was mysteriously rejected by all the relevant planning authorities in Scottishland...So some completely up-standing person, who in no way stands to gain anything from doing so, is making a new proposal on behalf of a totally not a front organisation for as yet unknown folk and is not in the slightest compromising his position as a local councillor who sits on many council committees...
OK, so not sarcastically...This does highlight the ludicrous state of what councillors are allowed to do. How the f.cking f.ck is someone in his position allowed to do this? Especially when the proposal was well thrown out, right up to Holyrood. And it does smack of some class of front for someone else.
It will be interesting to see the full details (when I go looking) to see how this differs from the rejected one, which was utter bollocks.
The original proposal for a totally necessary golf course in equally necessary proximity to a completely unnecessary SSRI and NNR was mysteriously rejected by all the relevant planning authorities in Scottishland...So some completely up-standing person, who in no way stands to gain anything from doing so, is making a new proposal on behalf of a totally not a front organisation for as yet unknown folk and is not in the slightest compromising his position as a local councillor who sits on many council committees...
OK, so not sarcastically...This does highlight the ludicrous state of what councillors are allowed to do. How the f.cking f.ck is someone in his position allowed to do this? Especially when the proposal was well thrown out, right up to Holyrood. And it does smack of some class of front for someone else.
It will be interesting to see the full details (when I go looking) to see how this differs from the rejected one, which was utter bollocks.