TimW wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 7:02 pm
TimW wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 4:04 pm
El Pollo Diablo wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 2:27 pm
I don't really have words to shape around the cold, mute fury that I'm feeling right now.
Yes but look at all those exciting "new" projects we're getting.
As a result of the decision to scrap the extension of HS2, every region will now receive investment in the modes of transport that matter to you most.
South East
Funding to ensure the delivery of road schemes: This includes the A2 at Brenley Corner, a notorious bottleneck on the corridor to Dover.
£290 million to deliver 14 road schemes: Roads across the South East set to be revitalised, among them the A259 between Bognor Regis and Littlehampton.
Access to £2.8 billion to combat potholes: Fixing potholes causing misery for drivers in the South East, South West and East of England
£1 billion fund will be launched for new road schemes
£2 bus fare extended: Until the end of December 2024 instead of rising to £2.50 as planned.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/find ... our-region
The list seems to have disappeared.
To suddenly come up with a long list of things you will fund instead, well they are bound to be things that have already been studied and planned, at least in principle. And probably not an especially coherent programme flung together in moments. So it is an easy criticism that these are all things that were going to happen anyway. Doubtless there will be arguments over what was already funded and when to try and discover how much is really money diverted from HS2, and how much is sleight of hand.
But then there's reality. It's all very well announcing loads of new road schemes, but National Highways is forever falling behind on delivering the program it is already committed to deliver. It was scaled back to delivering about £1bn of schemes a year during the hardest period of Osbourne Austerity, and during 2015-2020 was supposed to upscale from £1.5bn/year at the start to £3bn/year at the end, and failed to achieve that. So it's present 2020-25 program includes quite a lot of stuff left over 15/20, and some things the government originally wanted to build in that period were pushed beyond 25. But it continues to fall behind, even after that scaling back. So trying to add more things that were not already in the pipeline, if NH is the delivery body, well it's seems wishful thinking. And then there's a question over the ability of the construction industry to scale up to deliver all this, and they are going to be wary about it with National Highways persistently procuring less than is in its stated pipeline.
National Highways only looks after motorways and trunk roads (a selection of major A-roads), and so many schemes will be local authority schemes. But they are competing for the same scarce construction resources, and will have similar difficulties driving an increase in output. And construction inflation is something unbelievable, probably due to a combination of Brexit, Covid fall-out, the failure of Carillion, and all this huge amount extra output now being funded that wasn't happening during Osbourne Austerity. They aren't going to massively tool-up and employ people only to see the quantities fail to be procured, or some new financial crisis force another austerity cut-back. They'll scale up a bit and just be happy they have a choice of the work going. The only positive thing to observe is that at least Heathrow 3rd runway isn't going ahead, or there'd be no one left to build anything else.