I noted that the process uses silicon germanium, but only because there are chemicals which etch SiGe and not Si, so you can etch the SiGe layers away from between the Si to leave these free-standing Si ribbons.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman.bsky.social / bsky.app/profile/chrastina.net
threads.net/@dannychrastina
Regarding the scale, I read that the "2nm" is no longer a real size measure but a kind of proxy equivalent. The transistors are now stacked up in several layers, but if you were able to squeeze them all in a single layer, then you would need a 2nm resolution to make it. The resolution used to produce these chips is actually less than that, but it is damned impressive nevertheless.
There's something analogous going on in the time domain. The speculative instruction execution of current processors is so accurate that a fixed point add operation takes, on average, less than one clock cycle. (Mentioned in one of Lex Fridman's YouTube interviews, I'll try to find the source tomorrow.)
Money is just a substitute for luck anyway. - Tom Siddell
basementer wrote: Fri May 07, 2021 4:30 pm
There's something analogous going on in the time domain. The speculative instruction execution of current processors is so accurate that a fixed point add operation takes, on average, less than one clock cycle. (Mentioned in one of Lex Fridman's YouTube interviews, I'll try to find the source tomorrow.)