Fluoride in water: good, bad or IABMCTT?
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 10:30 am
RFK Jr has brought this topic to the fore again.
A surprisingly balanced article from Sky News suggesting IABMCTT. Or a cleverly skewed article that I failed to spot?
Tldr: In places where nearly everyone uses fluoride toothpaste, and even more so where many people also drink tea, there appears to be little additional benefit from flouride in water. Toothpaste is a better way of applying than drinking it, anyway. There are some actual risks from fluoride in water. The concentrations where actual damage might become material are not well characterised. The main risk of concern is developmental risk to fetuses (via pregnant mothers) and younger children. Whilst 1.5ppm is the max safe level specified in EU, whether in fact there is a material risk at the only slightly lower concentrations, such as 0.7ppm, as added in UK, or 1ppm as in US, is not known with certainty. In more deprived areas where tooth cleaning is less common, then perhaps benefits exceed risks. In UK, where only 10% of water is fluoridated, there are proposals to extend it, but only in more deprived areas, suggesting this argument is understood and acted on. In US, where 75% of water is fluoridated, maybe it is unnecessary in many such areas.
A surprisingly balanced article from Sky News suggesting IABMCTT. Or a cleverly skewed article that I failed to spot?
Tldr: In places where nearly everyone uses fluoride toothpaste, and even more so where many people also drink tea, there appears to be little additional benefit from flouride in water. Toothpaste is a better way of applying than drinking it, anyway. There are some actual risks from fluoride in water. The concentrations where actual damage might become material are not well characterised. The main risk of concern is developmental risk to fetuses (via pregnant mothers) and younger children. Whilst 1.5ppm is the max safe level specified in EU, whether in fact there is a material risk at the only slightly lower concentrations, such as 0.7ppm, as added in UK, or 1ppm as in US, is not known with certainty. In more deprived areas where tooth cleaning is less common, then perhaps benefits exceed risks. In UK, where only 10% of water is fluoridated, there are proposals to extend it, but only in more deprived areas, suggesting this argument is understood and acted on. In US, where 75% of water is fluoridated, maybe it is unnecessary in many such areas.