COVID-19
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Right, but there's such an enormous difference between you choosing to do all those things and government forcing you.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
What about surgical spirit? Would whatever oil they put in react with the peroxide?Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:06 amNo. It is less effective than ethanol or iso-propanol, and more toxic to humans. I wouldn't want to regularly put it on my skin.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 8:51 pmThat's handy. Can you use methylated spirit for the alcohol?Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 8:45 pmThe WHO publishes guidelines on preparation of handrubs: WHO: Guide to Local Production:WHO-recommended Handrub Formulations.
The amount of alcohol (ethanol or iso-propanol) is important - both too little and too much renders the product less effective.
See also Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Jan; 12(1): 147–179 Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Hence the guy on our local news who is self-isolating in his caravan on the driveway to protect his wife and kid. They wave at him occasionally through the kitchen window & he seemed quite upbeat about it all. Said he's getting lots of work done.mediocrity511 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 12:59 pmWell yes it would be selfish in those cases still. Understandable definitely, but still selfish. Those people will now go home and put their children/elderly mother/boyfriend at increased risk. They may choose to self isolate upon return, but looking at what the UK guidelines are in that situation, they are very difficult to get right in households with more than a couple of occupants. {my bold}
It is going to be difficult for people to completely self-isolate within most family homes. Not all of us have a caravan to use.
Lastest report from Imperial suggests international surveillance might have missed about 2/3 of cases coming out of China. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-i ... ronavirus/
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
I don't think there is a single definition of ingredients in 'surgical spirit', so taking random surgical spirit and expecting to be able to make efficacious hand sanitiser with it would be inadvisable. To answer your question, the peroxide would likely react with the oil (often castor oil) included in some preparations, but I have no idea it it would be significant. As far as I understand, the peroxide is included in the ingredients to reduce the microbial load that may already be in the ingredients used to prepare hand and surface sanitiser.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:03 pmWhat about surgical spirit? Would whatever oil they put in react with the peroxide?Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:06 amNo. It is less effective than ethanol or iso-propanol, and more toxic to humans. I wouldn't want to regularly put it on my skin.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 8:51 pm
That's handy. Can you use methylated spirit for the alcohol?
See also Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Jan; 12(1): 147–179 Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
Please note, I am not an expert in the preparation of hand sanitisers, and I would not be comfortable with people regarding what I write as advice to be followed blindly. If this is something you want to pursue, I strongly suggest you find someone who is expert, and ask them. I could inadvertently give bad advice, that, in the wrong circumstances, could be life threatening: I would not want someone to depend on something I say to produce effective hand sterilisation products.
- mediocrity511
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 2:16 pm
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Yes those with caravans, en suites and guest bedrooms etc. will have a much easier time. I think the only way our house could be worse for it would be if we were like many of the houses round here where the bathroom is out the back of the kitchen. Fortunately ours is at least upstairs.raven wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 4:15 pmHence the guy on our local news who is self-isolating in his caravan on the driveway to protect his wife and kid. They wave at him occasionally through the kitchen window & he seemed quite upbeat about it all. Said he's getting lots of work done.mediocrity511 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 12:59 pmWell yes it would be selfish in those cases still. Understandable definitely, but still selfish. Those people will now go home and put their children/elderly mother/boyfriend at increased risk. They may choose to self isolate upon return, but looking at what the UK guidelines are in that situation, they are very difficult to get right in households with more than a couple of occupants. {my bold}
It is going to be difficult for people to completely self-isolate within most family homes. Not all of us have a caravan to use.
Lastest report from Imperial suggests international surveillance might have missed about 2/3 of cases coming out of China. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-i ... ronavirus/
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8341
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
I don't remember what my prediction was but today it's 7375 (out of which 6387 are currently infected). The exponential growth predicts about 9000 tomorrow.shpalman wrote: ↑Sat Mar 07, 2020 5:30 pmToday's number is actually 5883, out of which 5061 are currently infected. So yeah it's still going up exponentially.shpalman wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 5:33 pmToday's numbers - 4636 total infections of which 3916 are still infected - doesn't fit with the idea of a SIR model which is peaking (limited to something like a susceptible population of 6-7000), but rather with the idea that the exponential growth switched to a longer time constant 5 days ago as the containment measures took effect. So with that in mind the prediction for tomorrow's total infections would be about 5700.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
No problem, thanks for your thoughts. I'll stick to soap!Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:10 pmI don't think there is a single definition of ingredients in 'surgical spirit', so taking random surgical spirit and expecting to be able to make efficacious hand sanitiser with it would be inadvisable. To answer your question, the peroxide would likely react with the oil (often castor oil) included in some preparations, but I have no idea it it would be significant. As far as I understand, the peroxide is included in the ingredients to reduce the microbial load that may already be in the ingredients used to prepare hand and surface sanitiser.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:03 pmWhat about surgical spirit? Would whatever oil they put in react with the peroxide?Pucksoppet wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:06 am
No. It is less effective than ethanol or iso-propanol, and more toxic to humans. I wouldn't want to regularly put it on my skin.
See also Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Jan; 12(1): 147–179 Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
Please note, I am not an expert in the preparation of hand sanitisers, and I would not be comfortable with people regarding what I write as advice to be followed blindly. If this is something you want to pursue, I strongly suggest you find someone who is expert, and ask them. I could inadvertently give bad advice, that, in the wrong circumstances, could be life threatening: I would not want someone to depend on something I say to produce effective hand sterilisation products.
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Walking through Manchester's Chinatown this afternoon we saw a few people wearing facemasks.
Including one guy who had his facemask pulled down so he could smoke his cigarette.
Including one guy who had his facemask pulled down so he could smoke his cigarette.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Good thread on SARS-CoV-2 and why soap is the best preventativeTrinucleus wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:37 pmNo problem, thanks for your thoughts. I'll stick to soap!
https://twitter.com/PalliThordarson/sta ... 5189597189
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
That's brilliant. Especially how different surfaces affect thingsGfamily wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 7:46 pmGood thread on SARS-CoV-2 and why soap is the best preventativeTrinucleus wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:37 pmNo problem, thanks for your thoughts. I'll stick to soap!
https://twitter.com/PalliThordarson/sta ... 5189597189
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
f.ck, tomorrow could be a hell of a day in the markets. Oil price crashing. Banks in a catch-22 position. EasyJet in a nasty situation by my reckoning. Other companies in unknowable positions.
Awarded gold star 4 November 2021
- basementer
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: 8024, Aotearoa
- Contact:
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
The NZ market is down a bit over two percent at lunchtime. It's a buying opportunity.
Money is just a substitute for luck anyway. - Tom Siddell
- Bird on a Fire
- Princess POW
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:05 pm
- Location: Portugal
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Fights are really cheap right now. Pretty sure I'm going to Mexico this summer.
We have the right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment.
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
If any airlines are still in operation.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:27 amFights are really cheap right now. Pretty sure I'm going to Mexico this summer.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7165
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
National governments may bail them out if the whole sector is facing bankruptcy. But very likely not all of them.Gfamily wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:39 amIf any airlines are still in operation.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:27 amFights are really cheap right now. Pretty sure I'm going to Mexico this summer.
- Brightonian
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
- Location: Usually UK, often France and Ireland
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
FTSE down 8% at the momentbasementer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:52 pmThe NZ market is down a bit over two percent at lunchtime. It's a buying opportunity.
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1520
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Wasn't helped by the Saudis deciding to start a oil-price war with Russia and the US.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8341
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Temporal variation in transmission during the COVID-19 outbreak
Don't remember if this has already been posted but it's regularly updated anyway.
It seems to show that R_0 has dropped below 2 in Italy. This idea that there may be a couple of days of asymptomatic transmission before infection is detected increases the effective number of infections in the population and therefore reduces R_0.
We would need to wait a week or so to see if the exponential growth has been slowed by the measures which have just been implemented.
Don't remember if this has already been posted but it's regularly updated anyway.
It seems to show that R_0 has dropped below 2 in Italy. This idea that there may be a couple of days of asymptomatic transmission before infection is detected increases the effective number of infections in the population and therefore reduces R_0.
We would need to wait a week or so to see if the exponential growth has been slowed by the measures which have just been implemented.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
- Pucksoppet
- Snowbonk
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:13 pm
- Location: Girdling the Earth
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
I'm hoping that the insurance company that is the custodian of my main pension doesn't go bust.Brightonian wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:10 amFTSE down 8% at the momentbasementer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:52 pmThe NZ market is down a bit over two percent at lunchtime. It's a buying opportunity.
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Easyjet shares are down but not exceptionally so, and not even by as much as the FTSE index. The biggest falls are the oil companies.FlammableFlower wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:21 amWasn't helped by the Saudis deciding to start a oil-price war with Russia and the US.
-
- Clardic Fug
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:26 am
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
On of the big issues is managing the financial impacts of any shutdown versus the financial impacts of letting things run their course. It's no good stopping the disease if you trash your economy to do it.
The outcome of today's COBR(M) will be interesting. Wisely NAIDEX has been cancelled this year as it's a high risk event given the vulnerability of a lot of the attendees
The outcome of today's COBR(M) will be interesting. Wisely NAIDEX has been cancelled this year as it's a high risk event given the vulnerability of a lot of the attendees
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Interesting article in the NYT by a senior WHO type on what he saw in China
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/04/heal ... lward.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/04/heal ... lward.html
In Guangdong, they went back and retested 320,000 samples originally taken for influenza surveillance and other screening. Less than 0.5 percent came up positive, which is about the same number as the 1,500 known Covid cases in the province. (Covid-19 is the medical name of the illness caused by the coronavirus.)
There is no evidence that we’re seeing only the tip of a grand iceberg, with nine-tenths of it made up of hidden zombies shedding virus. What we’re seeing is a pyramid: most of it is aboveground.
Once we can test antibodies in a bunch of people, maybe I’ll be saying, “Guess what? Those data didn’t tell us the story.” But the data we have now don’t support it.
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8341
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
Yes that's very interesting thanks.calmooney wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 11:13 amInteresting article in the NYT by a senior WHO type on what he saw in China
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/04/heal ... lward.htmlIn Guangdong, they went back and retested 320,000 samples originally taken for influenza surveillance and other screening. Less than 0.5 percent came up positive, which is about the same number as the 1,500 known Covid cases in the province. (Covid-19 is the medical name of the illness caused by the coronavirus.)
There is no evidence that we’re seeing only the tip of a grand iceberg, with nine-tenths of it made up of hidden zombies shedding virus. What we’re seeing is a pyramid: most of it is aboveground.
Once we can test antibodies in a bunch of people, maybe I’ll be saying, “Guess what? Those data didn’t tell us the story.” But the data we have now don’t support it.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
-
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1520
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:22 pm
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
I wonder what it's like behind closed doors in the White House after the germophobes potential close call?:
Seems that Trump's diary is suddenly absent of rallies for a while.WaPo" wrote:A growing sense of concern and uncertainty about the reach of the novel coronavirus has begun to take hold in the White House, after an attendee at a recent political conference where President Trump spoke tested positive for covid-19, the disease caused by the virus.
Trump was photographed shaking hands with Matt Schlapp, the chairman of the American Conservative Union, who confirmed that he had been in direct contact with the infected man during the Conservative Political Action Conference last month.
Re: Wuhan Coronavirus
I'm wondering whether the "iconic" bankruptcies will be in the Cruise Ship industry, rather than airlines.Woodchopper wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:51 amNational governments may bail them out if the whole sector is facing bankruptcy. But very likely not all of them.Gfamily wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:39 amIf any airlines are still in operation.Bird on a Fire wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:27 amFights are really cheap right now. Pretty sure I'm going to Mexico this summer.