Exactly this.Little waster wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 5:01 pmBut the counter-argument is he made a hash of the referendum through a number of obvious and crucial mistakes.tenchboy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 1:43 pm
And didn't D.Cammy go to referendum to shut the brexiteers the f.ck up once and for all? - because he didn't beleive the country was so stupid as to actually vote leave?; and when it would come back to stay (as he thought it would) he could then flip it out of the court for good.
His mistake was in underestimating the stupidity of the british people: you can laugh at him for it but it's hard to knock him for having faith in the collective common sense (even if it was misplaced) when just about everyone since has relied on that stupidity to advance their own interests and get where they are today.
1. He never expected there to even to be a referendum, it was just an electoral wheeze to nick a few hundred UKIP voters in some key marginals and put some spurious clear blue water between the Tories and their Coalition partners. He fully expected 2015 to result in another Coalition with a much-shrunken and chastened LD party. He would then buy off the LDs with a promise to ditch the referendum and then pin the blame on them when the ERG objected. Meanwhile he could go back to the Blukip voters and say "look what the mean LDs made me do, now give me a workable majority in 2020 and we'll finish the job, pinkie promise." Ditching the referendum under those circumstances was a "Free Action" for Cameron and the likelihood is the LDs would have been so grateful to get even that they wouldn't have pushed for anything else, in which case Cameron would have had free rein to implement the rest of his manifesto with the un-complaining support of the rump of the LD MPs who had proven loyaler than his own back-benchers. It was a supposed win-win for Cameron, in the end it worked too well for him with the LDs imploding and the Blukippers giving him a full majority. At that point he shat himself as he now had to implement it.
Now that initial mistake lead to the others:-
2. Not putting in the groundwork. With idiocies such as withdrawing from the EPP and the shambles of the EU re-negotiation he had already pump-primed the Eurosceptics while undermining his own credibility in making the pro-EU argument, all compounded by an AWOL Labour Party and a shattered and discredited LD kicking away the other pro-EU supports.
3. Scheduling the referendum for the mid-terms. After 6 years of austerity and in the midst of the usual mid-term blues he essentially pulled down his pants and offered the public his buttocks with "Kick Me" written across it. Unsurprisingly they obliged.
4. The wording of the question. First, it was supposed to be a choice between the "new and improved" re-negotiated deal and leave, but after he had made such a hash of the re-negotiation it was no longer felt even worth making the offer. Then it became a straight choice between Remain and Leave, a choice between Remaining in the known imperfect status quo and whatever personal fantasy Leave you could imagine; at a stroke maximising the Leave vote as old-school Lexiteers, Singapore-on-Thames zealots and the "no one is talking about leaving the Single Market" moderates could all paint in whatever mutually-exclusive sunny upland they wanted onto the same binary outcome. The wording should have been specific on spelling out what Leave actually meant, was it the Norway option, the Swiss option, the Turkish option or the Canada-plus option even if it meant having multiple questions and a run-off. As the May premiership taught us not one of those specific Leave options could ever summon even a plurality of support, only by lumping all of them in together did they scrape together the fabled 52%. Instead we came within hours of the Mauritius-minus option and ended up with the current half-baked deal which is already in crisis, with all the time the Brexiteers disingenuously claiming whatever was on the table at that given moment was the immutable Will of the People chosen with full knowledge of what it entailed.
5. The referendum criteria. They could have put in a say 60% supermajority requirement, or a 4-nation lock or a minimum turnout or a STV-voting model or 16+ voting age or ex-pat voting or EU citizen voting or any of a half-dozen ways to ensure any drastic change to the constitution genuinely reflected a true majority of the people affected, instead we has a 50%+1 winner-takes all on a 72% turn-out of UK-resident-and-citizen-only, one wet Thursday in June.
6. The campaign itself. Which to put it mildly was an utter shambles.
All stupid, all predictable, all Cameron's fault.
Who's next?
Re: Who's next?
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
- El Pollo Diablo
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 3359
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:41 pm
- Location: FBPE
Re: Who's next?
My boss used to work in the Treasury and has worked with Patrick Minford before. I mentioned that Liz Truss has a damp patch for him and he said "oh f.cking hell, we're doomed. Minford's insane"
If truth is many-sided, mendacity is many-tongued
- bob sterman
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 10:25 pm
- Location: Location Location
Re: Who's next?
This Liz Truss isn't so bad - showing early signs of the passion and drive she would later demonstrate in her cheese import abolition speech...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLOEwXHP8HI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLOEwXHP8HI
Re: Who's next?
Have you considered stupidity as an explanation
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
I imagine he's now sitting in a corner of the Mod Penthouse hugging himself and silently weeping out of the sheer, overwhelming joy of it all.jimbob wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 1:26 pmA thread specially for EPD
https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/1550 ... J4AaUGEK1w
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
- discovolante
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 4118
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm
Re: Who's next?
We've been trying to coax him out with pieces of Cumberland sausage for the last 7 hours but he won't move.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
Re: Who's next?
Have you tried putting a pastry lid on the Cumberland and calling it a pie?discovolante wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 11:05 pmWe've been trying to coax him out with pieces of Cumberland sausage for the last 7 hours but he won't move.
- Woodchopper
- Princess POW
- Posts: 7165
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Who's next?
Entirely reasonable response: https://twitter.com/ajrichardsonmp/stat ... AfdUGQzZgA
- tenchboy
- After Pie
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:18 pm
- Location: Down amongst the potamogeton.
Re: Who's next?
If you want me Steve, just Snapchat me yeah? You know how to Snapchap me doncha Steve? You just...
- shpalman
- Princess POW
- Posts: 8342
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:53 pm
- Location: One step beyond
- Contact:
Re: Who's next?
Ha, no, I see why you thought that, but I think the attention was just to draw attention to the particularity of the earrings while leaving the fact that she was otherwise normally dressed implicit!
Similarly I would have expected that Sunak wasn't literally only wearing a suit and shoes but would have also been wearing a shirt and presumably some sort of underwear!
I know, a stupid person might have gotten confused.
having that swing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it meaning a thing
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
@shpalman@mastodon.me.uk
Re: Who's next?
I don't remember Doris making similar complaints about the cost of Johnson's suits. Did he buy his from Topman?Woodchopper wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:10 amEntirely reasonable response: https://twitter.com/ajrichardsonmp/stat ... AfdUGQzZgA
Re: Who's next?
Its likely Sunak’s cheapest suit and shoes.
Re: Who's next?
Taking it slightly seriously for no good reason, it seems a bit off to compare the cost of just her earrings (which needs verifying anyway) with the cost of his suit and shoes, which accounts for most of his attire. He's probably not even going to be wearing earrings, that's how much of a cheapskate he is.
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: Who's next?
Would "Vote Liz, get Nadine" scare some into Rishi's camp?
- Tessa K
- Light of Blast
- Posts: 4746
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm
- Location: Closer than you'd like
Re: Who's next?
What would Truss and Sunak's wrestling/boxing nicknames be?
Re: Who's next?
The Punjab Ponce and The Blue Hag.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
Surgical Truss vs The Sunak-Attack
I'm picturing Rishi in some sort of mask ensemble while Liz is dressed like an extra from a hospital-based Carry On film from the 70s.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
- Little waster
- After Pie
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Location: About 1 inch behind my eyes
Re: Who's next?
And ... Truss is at it again.
“As a comfortably middle class girl living in leafy suburb who went to a nice school that got me into Oxford, I was so appalled by how much whichever bunch of child-hating Communists were the UK government in the 80s and early 90s held me back that I joined the Conservative Party ... eventually. Now hold my handbag as I cosplay Maggie once again”.
“As a comfortably middle class girl living in leafy suburb who went to a nice school that got me into Oxford, I was so appalled by how much whichever bunch of child-hating Communists were the UK government in the 80s and early 90s held me back that I joined the Conservative Party ... eventually. Now hold my handbag as I cosplay Maggie once again”.
This place is not a place of honor, no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here, nothing valued is here.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.
This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
Re: Who's next?
Aw, i rather liked “The Charmin’ Brahmin”
As a double act, Blinky and Thinky
As a double act, Blinky and Thinky
-
- After Pie
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:02 am
Re: Who's next?
Isn't "Vote Liz, get Liz" scary enough?Trinucleus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:22 pmWould "Vote Liz, get Nadine" scare some into Rishi's camp?