There’s a good article on the NEXT equal pay ruling here (h/t Tom Chivers on Twitter). The point it makes seems very obvious which is why I’m still baffled by the ruling. I keep thinking I must be missing something fundamental.
https://www.mikesblog.net/p/puppies-and ... medium=web
NEXT equal pay ruling
Re: NEXT equal pay ruling
You're not alone in thinking that
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!