Starmer

[Tristan]

You keep saying that, but you haven't said how many more small companies are involved than big companies. If it's 100 times more (and I'd expect it's more than that given the likely scalings), then you're not making sense.

You’re assuming that the effort required grows at the same rate as the number of companies. Perhaps that would be the case if it was all the gap needed prosecutions to fix. But if it’s more likely down to errors etc. (as you claim) then solutions could be put in place that help many more companies meet their tax obligations.

Eh? That's not what I'm talking about at all.

Sure, whatever.

[bjn]

This is extremely disturbing, to put it mildly. The Labour faction now running the party and proving itself to be utterly crap at delivering change for normal Britons took undeclared money from a number of rich folk to fund their campaign, all while trying to make it look like a grass roots movement. In the process they smeared journalists looking into this and set private investigators on several of them.

Note that McSweeney is a protege of Mandelson.

https://democracyforsale.substack.com/p ... ns-starmer