photo of an atom
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: photo of an atom
It's a bit of a con, the strontium atom is effectively a very bright point light source, so OK you can see it but since the wavelength of light is much bigger that an atom it cannot be resolved: There could actually be two strontium atoms there and you couldn't tell.
I'm sure I saw a similar picture of a calcium atom in an ion trap like that years ago.
The field ion microscope can however resolve single atoms.
I'm sure I saw a similar picture of a calcium atom in an ion trap like that years ago.
The field ion microscope can however resolve single atoms.
Perit hic laetatio.
- Gentleman Jim
- Catbabel
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Re: photo of an atom
Photo of an atomic reaction
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51305216
One of yours, dyqik?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51305216
One of yours, dyqik?
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: photo of an atom
I did a uni project with one of those - amazing. You can see dislocations in the structure as little spiralsBoustrophedon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:17 pmIt's a bit of a con, the strontium atom is effectively a very bright point light source, so OK you can see it but since the wavelength of light is much bigger that an atom it cannot be resolved: There could actually be two strontium atoms there and you couldn't tell.
I'm sure I saw a similar picture of a calcium atom in an ion trap like that years ago.
The field ion microscope can however resolve single atoms.
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: photo of an atom
Now I have a problem, in that my memory may be faulty, but we had one at school and it looked, in my memory, nothing like the hulking great cryogenically cooled versions to be seen on an image search. So I am confused.
The one at school looked like a big round bottomed chemistry flask with the inside of the bottom coated with phosphor and some electrical connections at the back. It was probably made by Philip Harris or one of the other concerns that made lab equipment for schools.
There was an elaborate rigmarole which involved high voltages possibly reversed to clean and etch the tungsten tip and then with a high voltage connected you got those pretty pictures as above. I remember it well because I was being a complete arse and trolling the teacher asking the teacher if they were not actually some sort of diffraction pattern.
The other part of the demonstration involved boiling off some other metal atoms from another electrode and you could see the individual atoms dancing around as moving dots on the image.
I ask because it was such a simple bit of kit and such a beautiful demonstration, but I can find no trace online of that particular piece of kit. Did anyone else see one or am I imagining it?
The one at school looked like a big round bottomed chemistry flask with the inside of the bottom coated with phosphor and some electrical connections at the back. It was probably made by Philip Harris or one of the other concerns that made lab equipment for schools.
There was an elaborate rigmarole which involved high voltages possibly reversed to clean and etch the tungsten tip and then with a high voltage connected you got those pretty pictures as above. I remember it well because I was being a complete arse and trolling the teacher asking the teacher if they were not actually some sort of diffraction pattern.
The other part of the demonstration involved boiling off some other metal atoms from another electrode and you could see the individual atoms dancing around as moving dots on the image.
I ask because it was such a simple bit of kit and such a beautiful demonstration, but I can find no trace online of that particular piece of kit. Did anyone else see one or am I imagining it?
Perit hic laetatio.
Re: photo of an atom
Are you thinking of something like a double fine beam tube or similar? - something likeBoustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:00 pmNow I have a problem, in that my memory may be faulty, but we had one at school and it looked, in my memory, nothing like the hulking great cryogenically cooled versions to be seen on an image search. So I am confused.
The one at school looked like a big round bottomed chemistry flask with the inside of the bottom coated with phosphor and some electrical connections at the back. It was probably made by Philip Harris or one of the other concerns that made lab equipment for schools.
There was an elaborate rigmarole which involved high voltages possibly reversed to clean and etch the tungsten tip and then with a high voltage connected you got those pretty pictures as above. I remember it well because I was being a complete arse and trolling the teacher asking the teacher if they were not actually some sort of diffraction pattern.
The other part of the demonstration involved boiling off some other metal atoms from another electrode and you could see the individual atoms dancing around as moving dots on the image.
I ask because it was such a simple bit of kit and such a beautiful demonstration, but I can find no trace online of that particular piece of kit. Did anyone else see one or am I imagining it?
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: photo of an atom
It could have looked like that, there were several different tubes in that series. My memory is of it on a wooden stand?
Perit hic laetatio.
Re: photo of an atom
Probably they used to have wooden stands.Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:50 pmIt could have looked like that, there were several different tubes in that series. My memory is of it on a wooden stand?
Re: photo of an atom
Never had wooden stands in my time working in schools (from 1983). It's possible Don's school had some really old kit.
And remember that if you botch the exit, the carnival of reaction may be coming to a town near you.
Fintan O'Toole
Fintan O'Toole
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: photo of an atom
Im talking 1970s here when I were a kid. School was 300 years old and the building dated from 1911, actually the science block was built in 63. There was some victorian stuff in there.
Perit hic laetatio.
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: photo of an atom
The one I worked on was a very expensive looking collection of stainless steel piping and fancy electrical stuff to enhance the image. Was about the size of an electron microscope. Certainly the process of boiling off atoms until you got the pattern was how it ran.Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:00 pmNow I have a problem, in that my memory may be faulty, but we had one at school and it looked, in my memory, nothing like the hulking great cryogenically cooled versions to be seen on an image search. So I am confused.
The one at school looked like a big round bottomed chemistry flask with the inside of the bottom coated with phosphor and some electrical connections at the back. It was probably made by Philip Harris or one of the other concerns that made lab equipment for schools.
There was an elaborate rigmarole which involved high voltages possibly reversed to clean and etch the tungsten tip and then with a high voltage connected you got those pretty pictures as above. I remember it well because I was being a complete arse and trolling the teacher asking the teacher if they were not actually some sort of diffraction pattern.
The other part of the demonstration involved boiling off some other metal atoms from another electrode and you could see the individual atoms dancing around as moving dots on the image.
I ask because it was such a simple bit of kit and such a beautiful demonstration, but I can find no trace online of that particular piece of kit. Did anyone else see one or am I imagining it?
I can vaguely remember some rudimentary set up with a glass flask which used the same principle which sounds like what you're thinking of?
Re: photo of an atom
SEM or TEM or STEM? All very different sizes.
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
now I sin till ten past three
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: photo of an atom
Sounds like it.Trinucleus wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:19 pm
The one I worked on was a very expensive looking collection of stainless steel piping and fancy electrical stuff to enhance the image. Was about the size of an electron microscope. Certainly the process of boiling off atoms until you got the pattern was how it ran.
I can vaguely remember some rudimentary set up with a glass flask which used the same principle which sounds like what you're thinking of?
Perit hic laetatio.
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: photo of an atom
- Gentleman Jim
- Catbabel
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Re: photo of an atom
Like, very "flame-proof", wooden retort stands and clamps?Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 5:34 pmIm talking 1970s here when I were a kid. School was 300 years old and the building dated from 1911, actually the science block was built in 63. There was some victorian stuff in there.
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.
- Trinucleus
- Dorkwood
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
Re: photo of an atom
And the asbestos mats.....Gentleman Jim wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:44 amLike, very "flame-proof", wooden retort stands and clamps?Boustrophedon wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 5:34 pmIm talking 1970s here when I were a kid. School was 300 years old and the building dated from 1911, actually the science block was built in 63. There was some victorian stuff in there.
- Gentleman Jim
- Catbabel
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Re: photo of an atom
Not just the mats.
There was a big panic last summer, in some schools, when some of the gauzes that sit on top of the tripod, were found to contain very low levels of asbestos in the "ceramic" centre.
Cue 100's of schools (including this one), hurriedly disposing of all old gauzes, and ordering "certificated Asbestos-free" new ones - when any could be found with the panic buying
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.
- Boustrophedon
- Stummy Beige
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:58 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire Wolds
Re: photo of an atom
Remember the fuss the year before over dinitrophenylhydrazine?Gentleman Jim wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 8:40 am
Not just the mats.
There was a big panic last summer, in some schools, when some of the gauzes that sit on top of the tripod, were found to contain very low levels of asbestos in the "ceramic" centre.
Cue 100's of schools (including this one), hurriedly disposing of all old gauzes, and ordering "certificated Asbestos-free" new ones - when any could be found with the panic buying
Perit hic laetatio.
- Gentleman Jim
- Catbabel
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Re: photo of an atom
I wonder what will be next?
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.