And now Citibank itself for administering them. Some disapproving insider on that grant process described, in an informal context, what was going on as "gold bars being tipped off the edge". Trumpites have taken that as fact and evidence of criminal fraud. All grants were made by Sept 2024, but they are paid out over a longer period.bjn wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:29 pm It looks like Trump is trying to criminalise climate science. They have directed the FBI to investigate the charity Habitat for Humanity for taking climate grants from the EPA, their funds have been frozen by Citibank.
"The FBI has told Citibank that recipients of EPA climate grants are being considered as potentially liable for fraud. "
https://newrepublic.com/post/192660/tru ... anizations
Citibank received a contract to hold the fund and disburse the grants. Trump appointees are calling the fact of that contract fraudulent and unusual, even though the contract type and structure is so common it has a name, and the Treasury has a department to do it. Numerous lawyers within the DOJ refused to sign documents freezing funds at Citibank and initiating a Grand Jury process against it, because there was no evidence. The FBI refused to proceed against Citibank without a signed statement from DOJ that there was adequate evidence, but of course there wasn't so no lawyer would sign it. The Trump appointee, Martin, in the DOJ picked on one particular DOJ lawyer and insisted she resign for refusing to sign it, even though he couldn't get any other lawyer to do it. She resigned and published a statement why. In the end, only a request to freeze funds, which has no legal force, rather than judicial order to freeze, was sent to Citibank, who nonetheless complied. Martin then himself signed the papers for criminal process against Citibank, as no one else would, citing the "gold bars" hearsay as the evidence. Now recipients of the funds who are failing to get installments from Citibank are suing Citibank for failing to observe the contract to pay.
If you want the complete version there's an 18 min LegalEagle youtube video. It also has an interesting analysis of how different parts of the press report it - though that also moves into an extended advert for the press analysis service he uses to generate that content.