That Tate Modern case

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
discovolante
Light of Blast
Posts: 4333
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

That Tate Modern case

Post by discovolante »

The one where the neighbours sued because everyone was peeking into their flats from the viewing gallery, that one, well it's going to the Supreme Court apparently.
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
User avatar
discovolante
Light of Blast
Posts: 4333
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:10 pm

Re: That Tate Modern case

Post by discovolante »

Attachments
EsIShQoW8AAfWZO.jpeg
EsIShQoW8AAfWZO.jpeg (85.82 KiB) Viewed 971 times
To defy the laws of tradition is a crusade only of the brave.
User avatar
Grumble
Light of Blast
Posts: 5353
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:03 pm

Re: That Tate Modern case

Post by Grumble »

Cant we just buy them some curtains?
where once I used to scintillate
now I sin till ten past three
User avatar
Martin Y
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3309
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Re: That Tate Modern case

Post by Martin Y »

Grumble wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:23 am Cant we just buy them some curtains?
That would ruin the aesthetic.

When you buy an apartment with glass walls, the whole concept is for it to look like a shop window of expensive and tastefully quirky furniture, clearly not appear actually lived in and thus for it to fill you with a smug sense that almost-similarly monied aesthetes would be jealous of your magazine-perfect room arranged just so.

Importantly though, it exists for the sensation that it could be peered into but is not for actually being peered into.

Most emphatically it is not for looking at by people who could not conceive of aspiring to own it, nor by those who would fail to appreciate it and thus fail to feel the appropriate jealousy.
Post Reply